poohead, on 11 December 2013 - 10:36 AM, said:
PCs that are out in the world being used
Oh you mean laptops that are just virused desk ornaments now?
Quote
In the Xbox 360's lifetime, a more useful comparison. However, as you point out we dont know what those PCs are used for, so in fact MORE people could be gaming on PCs - the IDC figures are of no use because we don't know what the PCs are used for
We have many other metrics for that. You would sound just as disingenous if you said " maybe they are using them to play mwo we just have no way to tell" ...
Quote
New games, new sites, new methods of interaction. Just because old things become less popular doesn't mean new things are not taking their place in PC gaming. Just because *you* don't see it where you think it should be, does not mean it doesn't exist elsewhere.
so I'm supposed to believe in aliens building the pyramids and talking snakes too? again, we have plenty of metrics to look at. if the stocks for the pc industry in general aren't enough for you, you have steam statistics, xfire statistics, gamespot statistics, this fkn thread!....etc...
Quote
So you're shifting your argument again? Backwards compatibility is what takes the time, but because there are so many PCs with varying configs its natural for this to happen. The tech shift has always been gradual because of the huge and varied user base of PCs. Lack of DX11 only games is not a sign of PC gaming dying, its evidence of a large varied user base of PCs being used to game.
from 1994 - 2004 was a huge jump in technology, even to laymen just taking graphics for face value. I don't know why you want to fool yourself, but the industry isn't fooling me with all those new fancy cpu names every year. WHen multicore cpus are still basically being used like pentium 4's and what matters more still is clock speed. quad, 6 and even 8 cores now.....and almost ALL games still only use two!?!! Why are we buying them for? Oh wait most people aren't thats my point and apparenlty yours as well....lol
And I have to Disagree that backwards compatibility is more difficult to program or time consuming, then parallel processing which is a new frontier not yet explored, compared to whats already tried and tested.....Most programmers can't handle programming for multicore cpus or the new gpu technology. THis is just a sad sad fact. Its like trying to find someoen to program a super computer for its full potential. They don't seem to exist. Alot of it is things being undermined by intel themselves.
Lack of DX11, not only means we don't have the knowledgable programmers, It also means lack of people buying dx11 cards for them to even bother trying.
As you've state previously, and I agree, this means noone is buying new computers or upgrading. Keep proving my point man and agreeing with me in your own replies....I'm starting to wonder about you.
Quote
w/e helps you sleep at night bud.
Quote
People still upgrade, but slower than before most likely due to the economic mess we've been in for 5 years....
They sure buy the **** out of those expensive and useless ipads though. and love those new expensive consoles...
Edited by RichAC, 11 December 2013 - 12:59 PM.