315STD...in a Victor...
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.
How does that even work? How is that even worth playing over Metalanders for Leaguers who don't give a [REDACTED] about anything but winning? You've taken a Victor and robbed it of its single most crucial advantage over any other assault that isn't one of two Awesomes! @_@
Anyways.
Ahem:
PEOPLE. KNOCK IT THE [REDACTED] OFF.
This is the Guides and Strategies forum. Every single one of you who's saying "I'd be just fine if only those jerks would say that the Shadow Hawk is better
95% of the time instead of 100%!"
is completely missing the point of this entire forum. A thread like this, which is
not devoted to a single, specific build and how/why it works, DOES NOT CARE about fringe cases. It
does not care about the one pilot in a thousand who is
awesome in a Hunchback but is somehow completely unable to transfer those skills into the otherwise far superior Shadow Hawk. It
does not care about this one configuration you've got for a 4H that works really awesome for you and totally blows your boring Meta Hawks out of the water. It
does not care about your personal strategies, quirks, or favorite 'Mechs, because those are all for
you to find out.
Let me lay this out, plain and simple, so people can try and stop getting horrifically butthurt over something they have
no need to get horrifically butthurt about:
THERE IS NO PRACTICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 95% AND 100% WHEN ONE IS SPEAKING, AS THIS THREAD DOES, TO THE GENERAL POPULATION OF MWO AND NOT TO A SPECIFIC PLAYER
Really. There isn't. And if you're taking as deep offense at the notion that Victor is talking in absolutes rather than possibilities
for the sake of easy conversation, then substitute the 95% yourself. Because I guarantee you he's not talking to
you, nor is he specifically raining on your parade.
Case in point!
Victor, my oft-falsely-maligned jerkbag sorta-frenemy: you remember how, in the LRM Commandments thread, I usually used my TBT-5N as a comparison to other folks' assault 'Mechs to try and illustrate the point that a medium Lurmisher can pull down just as much damage as they do while taking up only half the tonnage? Remember how you
never once gave me guff about my choice of 'Mech, even though the TBT-5N is, in general use, decidedly suboptimal even within the TBT chassis whose only real advantage is a wider twist range (and better energy hardpoint distribution over the 3C I otherwise would have been stuck with, but still!)?
Here's the thing, folks:
I never recommended that new players snag a TBT-5N as the
best choice, hands down flat out, for a medium Lurmishing 'Mech.
None of us care what
you pilot. You want to brawl with a Hunchback,
be my guest. Do it up, and I wish you great joy of it. If you can consistently pull 500-damage games with the things,
fantastic! Keep up the good work, sir! The only thing we're asking is that you
STOP trying to get new players into 'Mechs that you
KNOW are less versatile and flexible than something like a Hunchback for the sole reason of you having an axe to grind!
PLAY WHAT YOU WANT TO PLAY. I do - I'm just fortunate in that what I've pretty much always wanted to play was a Shadow Hawk. Put XL engines in Victors -
please put XL engines in Victors, that 315STD design honestly makes me slightly ill >_<. Hell, put XL engines in Thunderbolts! I did, and it totally worked for me!
But unless you're writing a specific guide for a specific build with the specific message of "Hey, give this a shot, it worked a lot better than I figured it would," QUIT TRYING TO CLAIM FRINGE CASES DISPROVE THE NORM AND GET NEW PLAYERS WHO DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY WANT TO PILOT YET INTO HUNCHBACKS INSTEAD OF SHADOW HAWKS.
You're doing them a disservice,
and you know it. No matter how much more you,
personally, may like Hunchbacks over Shadow Hawks, from the perspective of a brand-new player who's going to be crap in
both, you know what the better choice is.
YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS. SO STOP IT.
Edited by 1453 R, 05 February 2014 - 05:31 AM.