So Basicly, The Wolf Were The "smart Guy's"?
#121
Posted 10 March 2014 - 10:06 PM
And, don't make me pull out my novels. I'll get sucked into one trying to find the right page with the right quot, and wont be able to find it for probably a few days to a week. Then, I'll find out you will dismiss it as you don't own the book and will feel (and rightly so) that I am making the fact up. (I'd only have one or two novels to read though...)
This reminds me, I need to get my brother to put the app onto my kindle so I can read the whole series for free...
#122
Posted 10 March 2014 - 10:25 PM
Tesunie, on 10 March 2014 - 10:06 PM, said:
And, don't make me pull out my novels. I'll get sucked into one trying to find the right page with the right quot, and wont be able to find it for probably a few days to a week. Then, I'll find out you will dismiss it as you don't own the book and will feel (and rightly so) that I am making the fact up. (I'd only have one or two novels to read though...)
This reminds me, I need to get my brother to put the app onto my kindle so I can read the whole series for free...
Well thats the difference then isn't it.
I assume that people who want to weigh into these discussions do know what they are talking about and have a valid point.
Too trusting I guess I am.
I just assume that because I know what I am putting up is direct from the 100+ source books (thats not the novels that all my scrungy mates have neglected to return btw) that what other people put up is true. And I'll even accept some Sarna if it makes sense (such as narrow defeat implying what Sarna says that Wolf killed more Clan's warriors in that trial) but I won't quote it as canon.
I put up the book and the page so that anyone with the same source book can check it for debating purposes, I don't try and hide what I base my opinion on.
But my opinion is definitly based on canon.
I don't try and disabuse anyone here in forums but sure, if I think I am right I will point out why I think that.
If you want to put it up I will assume that it is true and you want to debate a point. If I have the source book I'll even check it so that we can debate the context if relevant too.
But unless someone can show me something in canon that I cannot refute, I'm sticking to my guns that Clan Wolf did get beat up by other Clans repeatedly, that they didn't earn a position in the Invasion, that their leadership was distinctly anti Clan. That the only success in the military field they had during the Invasion was beating up the weakest IS power or fighting to a stand still on Tukayyid before being saved (my word) from a definitive victory or defeat by Ulric calling it quits while they were still fighting, all of which suggests that Clan Wolf was one of the weaker Clans in a military sense during the Invasion.
The OP has the warts and all canon and he can make his own decision about which Clan he wants to join (although he did say he likes the emblem do I guess it's a foregone conclusion:))
#124
Posted 11 March 2014 - 02:22 AM
Nathan K, on 11 March 2014 - 01:45 AM, said:
Nope, I'm relying on the canon one.
And correcting those who misrepresent their non canon views accordingly.
Call it a community service, I do it for free.
Your welcome by the way, my pleasure.
#125
Posted 11 March 2014 - 04:53 AM
If players have disagreed on this for years i cannot see how we can decide today
This is one of the good things of the BT history: you are never sure who is right and this keeps us discussing. Even if the Wardens may be the majority, no one can say for sure they are right, nor can the Crusaders. Keep the torch burning and carry it to the new generations!
#126
Posted 11 March 2014 - 08:44 AM
Umm... Ulric was only half the voice needed to stop the trial. Comstar also agreed with Ulric, ending the trialing, saying they could not take the second objective. Not to mention, Wolf was the only clan to gain two objectives.
And... now is where I quote from Sarna, have you ignore it again as non-cannon, and I'm still waiting for those source books you must have been buying me so I can "argue with a leg to stand on"....
http://www.sarna.net...tle_of_Tukayyid
"The ilKhan presented the terms of the bid to the Clan Grand Council, all of whom eagerly endorsed and ratified the bid. The vast majority of the Clan Warriors when presented with the battle saw an easy victory over the mystical warriors as a forgone conclusion, and the bidding in the Grand Council for the 'best' place in the invasion was fierce. The Smoke Jaguars and Nova Cats, eager to regain the face they had lost in their failed invasion of Luthien, bid dangerously low to gain the 'honor' of being the first Clan on the planet, all the Crusader Clans conspiring to ensure the Wolves would land last, with the least 'glorious' targets to strike at long after the Trial was expected to have been decided, an insult the Wolves were suspiciously happy to accept."
Once more, the Grand Council placed Wolf onto what was perceived as the easier targets, and to drop in last. Wolf just didn't object...
The Grand Council agreed to the terms presented to them, with no manipulation or lies (unlike Nicolas before) about the trial. Then, this same Grand Council tried to break the results of the trial several times. Isn't that unclan like? So much for the will of the council being pure...
I was looking for the exact terms of the bargain, but I fail to see it. Best I can come up with is a little vague.
"Twenty-five Galaxies from seven Clans would face off against twelve entire Armies of the Com Guards (equivalent to 144 regiments), each Clan being assigned two objective cities to take."
However, I read that as "Take". It doesn't say take and hold. Each clan had to take two objectives, while still being able to hold the first one. As far as my understanding goes, as soon as they can take the second objective, their part of the trial ends... I could be wrong here though. It's not very clear on the details. (And I haven't seen you post anything on these details either.)
Oh, and for the record, I may know Shar from around the forums, but I can tell you that if he was placing information I disagreed with, I'd be arguing with him as much as I am with you. He knows it to. We just tend to be of like mind on a lot of things (which is kinda scary sometimes..).
#127
Posted 11 March 2014 - 08:59 AM
Craig Steele, on 10 March 2014 - 10:25 PM, said:
But my opinion is definitly based on canon.
Ok lets try this again, as other people have already told you this, POST the information so that all can see and read it, even if you have to photo/scan it! It does no one any good to scream that a book that I own tells me this on page suchnots, but not post it so that those without that "source" book can see it is real and not just you referring to an obscure source book and making up your own facts. (rather you are making up facts or not I don't know, but that's what everyone else is going to start thinking when you refuse to post the information for all to see, not just a page reference. I want to READ this information and make a decision on my own, not trust someone else who may or may not know what they are talking about.) By not posting this information for all to see, and just posting the book and page info, you are indeed HIDING the info from the rest of the community! So, again (to make myself very clear) POST THE INFORMATION AND NOT JUST THE BOOK/PAGE LOCATION!
As a final note, your opinion is your opinion based on your interpretation of canon knowledge or information. Doesn't make it any more valid then the other people's opinion that is also based on those same facts.
#128
Posted 11 March 2014 - 09:06 AM
Tesunie, on 11 March 2014 - 08:44 AM, said:
Umm... Ulric was only half the voice needed to stop the trial. Comstar also agreed with Ulric, ending the trialing, saying they could not take the second objective. Not to mention, Wolf was the only clan to gain two objectives.
And... now is where I quote from Sarna, have you ignore it again as non-cannon, and I'm still waiting for those source books you must have been buying me so I can "argue with a leg to stand on"....
http://www.sarna.net...tle_of_Tukayyid
"The ilKhan presented the terms of the bid to the Clan Grand Council, all of whom eagerly endorsed and ratified the bid. The vast majority of the Clan Warriors when presented with the battle saw an easy victory over the mystical warriors as a forgone conclusion, and the bidding in the Grand Council for the 'best' place in the invasion was fierce. The Smoke Jaguars and Nova Cats, eager to regain the face they had lost in their failed invasion of Luthien, bid dangerously low to gain the 'honor' of being the first Clan on the planet, all the Crusader Clans conspiring to ensure the Wolves would land last, with the least 'glorious' targets to strike at long after the Trial was expected to have been decided, an insult the Wolves were suspiciously happy to accept."
Once more, the Grand Council placed Wolf onto what was perceived as the easier targets, and to drop in last. Wolf just didn't object...
The Grand Council agreed to the terms presented to them, with no manipulation or lies (unlike Nicolas before) about the trial. Then, this same Grand Council tried to break the results of the trial several times. Isn't that unclan like? So much for the will of the council being pure...
I was looking for the exact terms of the bargain, but I fail to see it. Best I can come up with is a little vague.
"Twenty-five Galaxies from seven Clans would face off against twelve entire Armies of the Com Guards (equivalent to 144 regiments), each Clan being assigned two objective cities to take."
However, I read that as "Take". It doesn't say take and hold. Each clan had to take two objectives, while still being able to hold the first one. As far as my understanding goes, as soon as they can take the second objective, their part of the trial ends... I could be wrong here though. It's not very clear on the details. (And I haven't seen you post anything on these details either.)
Oh, and for the record, I may know Shar from around the forums, but I can tell you that if he was placing information I disagreed with, I'd be arguing with him as much as I am with you. He knows it to. We just tend to be of like mind on a lot of things (which is kinda scary sometimes..).
Can you pull the citations from Sarna for this? While Sarna may not be fully canaon, the sources it cites the info from is.
#129
Posted 11 March 2014 - 09:10 AM
(Warning: Something went wonky, so I fixed it. Some links may no longer work right...)
Quote
References
http://www.sarna.net...te_ref-T-SJ_0-0
Tukayyid, pp. 29-38 "Campaign: Clan Smoke Jaguar"
http://www.sarna.net...e_ref-CS-SJ_1-0
ComStar, pp. 69-70 "Battle of Tukayyid - Ace in the Hole"
http://www.sarna.net...e_ref-WC-SJ_2-0
Wolf Clan, p. 47 "Days of Armageddon - Smoke Jaguar"
http://www.sarna.net...e_ref-IC-SJ_3-0
Invading Clans, pp. 61-62"Tukayyid: The Crucible"
http://www.sarna.net...te_ref-T-NC_4-0
Tukayyid, p. 40, 43, 45 "Campaign: Clan Nova Cat"
http://www.sarna.net...e_ref-IC-NC_5-0
Invading Clans, pg. 117 "Battle of Tukayyid"
http://www.sarna.net...te_ref-T-SV_6-0
Tukayyid, pp. 79-88 "Campaign: Clan Steel Viper"
http://www.sarna.net...e_ref-IC-SV_7-0
Invading Clans, pp. 86 "Tukayyid"
http://www.sarna.net...ref-FMWC-SV_8-0
Field Manual: Warden Clans, p. 136, 143, 145-146
http://www.sarna.net...te_ref-T-DS_9-0
Tukayyid, pp. 69-77 "Campaign: Clan Diamond Shark"
http://www.sarna.net..._ref-IC-DS_10-0
Invading Clans, p. 141 "Baptism of Fire"
http://www.sarna.net...ef-FMWC-DS_11-0
Field Manual: Warden Clans, pp. 61-62 "Summer Storms: Invasion and Upheaval"
http://www.sarna.net...-ER3052-62_12-0
Era Report: 3052, pp. 62-63 "Factions - Clan Diamond Shark"
http://www.sarna.net...e_ref-T-GB_13-0
Tukayyid, pp. 48-56 "Campaign: Clan Ghost Bear"
http://www.sarna.net..._ref-IC-GB_14-0
Invading Clans, p. 29 "Tukayyid: World of Fate"
http://www.sarna.net...ef-FMWC-GB_15-0
Field Manual: Warden Clans, p. 82 "The Roaring Bear"
http://www.sarna.net...e_ref-T-61_16-0
Tukayyid, p. 61-63, "Assault on Robyn's Crossing [18]"
http://www.sarna.net...e_ref-T-58_17-0
Tukayyid, pp. 58-59, "Campaign: Clan Jade Falcon"
http://www.sarna.net..._ref-CS-70_18-0
ComStar, pp. 70-71 "Battle of Tukayyid"
http://www.sarna.net..._ref-WC-50_19-0
http://www.sarna.net..._ref-WC-50_19-1
Wolf Clan, p. 50 "Days of Armageddon - Jade Falcon"
http://www.sarna.net...ef-JFSB-30_20-0
Jade Falcon Sourcebook, pp. 30-32 "Battle of Tukayyid"
http://www.sarna.net...e_ref-T-90_21-0
Tukayyid, p. 90, "Campaign: Clan Wolf"
http://www.sarna.net..._ref-CS-71_22-0
ComStar, pp. 71-72 "Battle of Tukayyid"
Bibliography
http://www.sarna.net...28sourcebook%29
ComStar (sourcebook)
http://www.sarna.net...ra_Report:_3052
Era Report: 3052
http://www.sarna.net...oad_%28novel%29
Exodus Road (novel)
http://www.sarna.net...Manual:_ComStar
Field Manual: ComStar
http://www.sarna.net..._Crusader_Clans
Field Manual: Crusader Clans
http://www.sarna.net...l:_Warden_Clans
Field Manual: Warden Clans
http://www.sarna.net...i/Invading_Clan
Invading Clans
http://www.sarna.net...lcon_Sourcebook
Jade Falcon Sourcebook
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Lost_Destiny
Lost Destiny
http://www.sarna.net...cenario_pack%29
Tukayyid (scenario pack)
http://www.sarna.net...Clan_Sourcebook
Wolf Clan Sourcebook
Edited by Tesunie, 11 March 2014 - 09:26 AM.
#130
Posted 11 March 2014 - 01:42 PM
It is well known the previous IlKhan Leo Showers presented alarmist evidence to the grand council to persuade the clans to invade. Ulric knew this was not the entire picture having had contact with the Wolfs Dragoons over the years and voted against it.
Nicolas Kerensky manipulated the grand council to cover up the possibility that the murder of his brother would be connected to him.
There are 2 examples of IlKhan manipulation, and you say Ulric is a traitor? More so than someone who provided cherry picked information to incite the invasion? More so than someone who had an entire clan annihilated to divert attention from his murderous tendencies?
I beg to differ.
I have read the source books, and frankly, I draw completely different conclusions than you are presenting...though, I suppose that is the Warden (half-full) versus Crusader (half-empty) view point difference.
You claim to be a warden, though you would mock the brightest star of a champion their cause ever had? Hypocrisy abounds in that statement...
#131
Posted 11 March 2014 - 02:31 PM
#132
Posted 11 March 2014 - 03:06 PM
Tesunie, on 11 March 2014 - 09:10 AM, said:
(Warning: Something went wonky, so I fixed it. Some links may no longer work right...)
Now go and check and your sources for accuracy and maybe you have something worth talking about. Cause you know if you don't know what the canon is of course you cannot comment on it with much accuracy (or at the very least, you will be prone to errors)
Gyrok, on 11 March 2014 - 01:42 PM, said:
It is well known the previous IlKhan Leo Showers presented alarmist evidence to the grand council to persuade the clans to invade. Ulric knew this was not the entire picture having had contact with the Wolfs Dragoons over the years and voted against it.
Nicolas Kerensky manipulated the grand council to cover up the possibility that the murder of his brother would be connected to him.
There are 2 examples of IlKhan manipulation, and you say Ulric is a traitor? More so than someone who provided cherry picked information to incite the invasion? More so than someone who had an entire clan annihilated to divert attention from his murderous tendencies?
I beg to differ.
I have read the source books, and frankly, I draw completely different conclusions than you are presenting...though, I suppose that is the Warden (half-full) versus Crusader (half-empty) view point difference.
You claim to be a warden, though you would mock the brightest star of a champion their cause ever had? Hypocrisy abounds in that statement...
And another person who freely admits they have zero interest in the actual canon and wants to argue that they know what the canon is.
I get that you prefer an alternative world where Ulric is a great man, I get that suits the fantasy world you prefer. It's not the fantasy world of BT, but its yours and you cherish it.
I'm just not going to debate every individuals nuances on their little fantasies.
Happy to discuss canon, but your comments are very much you're not interested in the canon because it doesn't suit your fantasy so honestly whats the point in us discussing. I'll tell you what canon is, you'll tell me what your fantasy is and the debate goes no where.
Edited by Craig Steele, 11 March 2014 - 03:06 PM.
#134
Posted 11 March 2014 - 04:00 PM
Conveniently you seem to ignore canon when it is not your version of canon or does not suit your argument.
Present me canon sources that say anything different about the 2 IlKhans I mentioned...the source books say they manipulated the grand council...or is your library a bit lacking?
Edited by Gyrok, 11 March 2014 - 04:09 PM.
#135
Posted 11 March 2014 - 04:17 PM
Gyrok, on 11 March 2014 - 04:00 PM, said:
Conveniently you seem to ignore canon when it is not your version of canon or does not suit your argument.
Present me canon sources that say anything different about the 2 IlKhans I mentioned...the source books say they manipulated the grand council...or is your library a bit lacking?
No, what I am doing is I'm ignoring a tangent argument that does not address the point.
You are wrong because both Nicholas and Leo enjoyed the support of the Grand Council, the united will of all the Clans, ergo they acted in accordance with the will of the Clans. We can argue the merits of that sure but it doesn't matter a jacks proverbial because even if they were both traitors, it doesn't change that Ulric DID NOT have the support of the Grand Council for his actions and WAS a traitor to the Clans.
Show me in your extensive library a canon source that demonstrates that Ulric's sabotage of the Clans Invasion was the will of the Grand Council (I honestly doubt you can, but happy to be guided)
You want to make tangent arguments that go no where, I want to debate the point. That's the only 'convenience' here.
If you cannot debate the point you want to belittle me, sure I get that. Attack the man because if you make me look silly ergo you are right.
You are not, and your tangent arguments serve no purpose except to distract.
EDIT: Actually while I am here, whats your Canon source that Nicholas manilpulated the Grand Council? I'd be interested to review that. Thanks
Edited by Craig Steele, 11 March 2014 - 04:21 PM.
#136
Posted 11 March 2014 - 06:44 PM
Also, if YOU question a sarna source reference, how about YOU go and check their accuracy? So far, Sarna has proven to be very accurate with what I have read. This leads me to conclude that the rest of the site should be fairly accurate too. They normally even place "This is not supported by Canon" on sections that are questionable to canon.
PS: One of those references linked at the bottom of the page is Exodus Road, a book I own and read...
But, then again, because it doesn't fall under your preconceived notion of "Canon", I'm wrong again anyway. So, I'm not even bothering to try and debate with you anyway. I'm wrong. You are right. Hard to debate with that mind set.
#137
Posted 11 March 2014 - 06:54 PM
Tesunie, on 11 March 2014 - 06:44 PM, said:
Also, if YOU question a sarna source reference, how about YOU go and check their accuracy? So far, Sarna has proven to be very accurate with what I have read. This leads me to conclude that the rest of the site should be fairly accurate too. They normally even place "This is not supported by Canon" on sections that are questionable to canon.
PS: One of those references linked at the bottom of the page is Exodus Road, a book I own and read...
But, then again, because it doesn't fall under your preconceived notion of "Canon", I'm wrong again anyway. So, I'm not even bothering to try and debate with you anyway. I'm wrong. You are right. Hard to debate with that mind set.
Well again, its not "my" definition of what canon is, its the definition provided by the owners of the BT IP.
You keep making this about me but it's not.
Fact - Sarna is not canon
Fact - I don't have to prove Sarna is not canon - it's not, the BT guys proved it for me (see link)
So again, if you want to have a discussion about the canon, inform yourself appropriately and lets talk about the right subject. If you want to have a discussion about the fan boy fantasy you interpret from non canon sources, I'm not interested.
Heres some more canon for you
Clan Wolf lost its major trials from 3048 to 3058
Clan Wolf did not earn a place in the Invasion of the Inner sphere in any trials
Clan Wolf had the easiest Invasion corridor against the weakest IS army the Clans faced during Revival
Clan Wolf did not finish their trial at Tukayyid, they did not defeat Comstar
Ergo, Clan Wolf was not the military super power that some fan boys want it to be (certainly not compared to the Clans that defeated it time and again) and clinging to non canon sources to support their world is all fine and dandy, but not canon.
#138
Posted 11 March 2014 - 08:22 PM
And, you still have failed to post ANYTHING we can see besides a quote from a book with a page number attached, unto which I'm not spending money so I can debate with you. You aren't that special.
Okay. Here is a hint. I don't care about the rest, as most of that was politics within the grand council. Prove that the trial was ended prematurely, giving Wolf a "fake" victory.
For not defeating Comstar, they seemed to have been on only clan to actually make it to not just one but both of their targets. Also against more experienced soldiers. Also against Comstar reinforcements. Also against 4 full armies of Comstar. ALSO, in order for the trial to end, Comstar and the clans had to agree it was over... Need I go on?
Buuttt... you're just going to ignore me anyway. Don't even know why I continue to respond.
Clan wolf was not weak. They were one of the top 4 clans. Guess why, in MW2, it was clan Wolf and Clan Falcon. Not Clan Falcon and Smoke Jaguar... Even then, Clan Wolf has been the only clan to survive being absorbed by another clan, for whatever reason. No other clan has come back from an absorption to my knowledge.
If Wolf is weak, then Ghost Bear was weaker. They ran away from the clan space with their tails between their legs, and ran into the waiting arms of the Inner Sphere. They "corrupted" themselves by joining and merging with the Inner Sphere state, becoming no longer Clan Ghost Bear, but the Ghost Bear Republic. Poor poor weak Ghost Bear...
And Smoke Jaguar was weak and traitorous for trying to bend the council and the clans to their will and protect them from, basically, a trial of annihilation issued from the Inner Sphere. They were so weak and unclan like, that they tried to get the other clans to help them out in a one on one trial, Inner Sphere "Star League" vs Clan Smoke Jaguar.
Oh, we could go on. On and on. On and on and on about how unclan like the clans can really be. How traitorous they all have been to the vision of Alexander... I mean Nicolas Kerensky. The Murderer of his own brother. The great deceiver of the clans, who, in an un-clan-like move tricked the entire clan council into killing an entire clan who could push for murder charges on him. Then somehow became a hero, who placed a "will" upon the clans.
And the Nova Cats are also weak, as they ended up siding with the Inner Sphere. They ended up getting (in an unclan like fashion too) jumped on before their moving due date to evac clan space. Because they got attached in a dishonorable sneak attach ahead of the scheduled time. All because they followed the true will of the Clans, and disobeyed the "corrupt" clan council, who stood by and watched as Nova Cat got attacked in such a low, and dishonorable way...
Shall we continue? Of course, you shall continue to ignore anything I present as not canon, so...
#139
Posted 11 March 2014 - 09:26 PM
Tesunie, on 11 March 2014 - 08:22 PM, said:
And, you still have failed to post ANYTHING we can see besides a quote from a book with a page number attached, unto which I'm not spending money so I can debate with you. You aren't that special.
Okay. Here is a hint. I don't care about the rest, as most of that was politics within the grand council. Prove that the trial was ended prematurely, giving Wolf a "fake" victory.
For not defeating Comstar, they seemed to have been on only clan to actually make it to not just one but both of their targets. Also against more experienced soldiers. Also against Comstar reinforcements. Also against 4 full armies of Comstar. ALSO, in order for the trial to end, Comstar and the clans had to agree it was over... Need I go on? (1)
Buuttt... you're just going to ignore me anyway. Don't even know why I continue to respond.
Clan wolf was not weak. They were one of the top 4 clans (2). Guess why, in MW2, it was clan Wolf and Clan Falcon. Not Clan Falcon and Smoke Jaguar... Even then, Clan Wolf has been the only clan to survive being absorbed by another clan, for whatever reason. No other clan has come back from an absorption to my knowledge.
If Wolf is weak, then Ghost Bear was weaker (3). They ran away from the clan space with their tails between their legs, and ran into the waiting arms of the Inner Sphere. They "corrupted" themselves by joining and merging with the Inner Sphere state, becoming no longer Clan Ghost Bear, but the Ghost Bear Republic. Poor poor weak Ghost Bear...
And Smoke Jaguar was weak (4) and traitorous for trying to bend the council and the clans to their will and protect them from, basically, a trial of annihilation issued from the Inner Sphere. They were so weak and unclan like, that they tried to get the other clans to help them out in a one on one trial, Inner Sphere "Star League" vs Clan Smoke Jaguar.
Oh, we could go on. On and on. On and on and on about how unclan like the clans can really be. How traitorous they all have been to the vision of Alexander... I mean Nicolas Kerensky. The Murderer of his own brother. The great deceiver of the clans, who, in an un-clan-like move tricked the entire clan council into killing an entire clan who could push for murder charges on him. (5) Then somehow became a hero, who placed a "will" upon the clans.
And the Nova Cats are also weak, (6) as they ended up siding with the Inner Sphere. They ended up getting (in an unclan like fashion too) jumped on before their moving due date to evac clan space. Because they got attached in a dishonorable sneak attach ahead of the scheduled time. All because they followed the true will of the Clans, and disobeyed the "corrupt" clan council, who stood by and watched as Nova Cat got attacked in such a low, and dishonorable way...
Shall we continue? Of course, you shall continue to ignore anything I present as not canon (7), so...
The people at BT determine what is canon and what is not. I get it doesn't suit you, I really do. But its not my call.
I think it's pretty unfair that if you challenge me and I can refute it I am arguing, but if I challenge you and you cannot refute it (with canon) I am ignoring you. I don't think I have ignored anyone here (even those who put their fingers in their ears and cry na na na na na).
All I am saying is this is what is in canon, and happy to review any other canon sources that you think might refute it. In the last few days some people have been attacking my canon based arguments with non canon sources and I said nope, that doesn't fly.
I can't change that Copyright laws don't permit BT's IP to be put up on the net. I guess they kinda see it as a way of ensuring revenue. So I am only going to quote canon sources and leave it up to you. If you want to call me a liar, fine. I'll still know I am right. I have never said you're not entitled to your non canon view of the universe, just that it is a non canon view. BUt honestly, I do think if you think I am lying after all the posts and conversations I have put up then I think that's a pretty sad thing for you. I am genuinely putting up canon and I invite anyone who wants to debate canon to put up their views / sources.
(1) Clan Wolf Sourcebook pg 51, "Clan Wolf inflicted heavy enough damage on the Comstar forces that the 13th Army was committed to the mountains. Before the new Constar force could join the engagement however, the battle for Tukayyid ended".
Yes of course Comstar had to agree. Lets see how this might have went.
Ulric, We're done, we concede victory to Comstar
Focht, Ummm, OK. ceasefire then?
Or are you suggesting the humanitarum in Focht would have prefered to keep the battle going after they won to pad out the kill counts? You probably should go on. I'd certainly like to know where Comstar magically created another 4 full armies that had not seen action on Tukayyid, I have no source book that implies they held back a reserve of that size. Indeed, that sort of reserve suggests that Comstar was much bigger than published data.
(2) On what basis? You can't argue they were in the first wave of the Invasion Clans because they never fought a trial for a position. I have shown consistently that Clan Wolf was defeated by other Clans, their achievements in the IS were not comparable to other Clans (heck, do you realise that the Wolves fought 7 FC RCT's in the first four waves, and Clan Jade Falcon fought 7 in the first wave. Doesn't that tell you anything about the size of the battles fought by Clan Wolf vs the size of the battles fought (in this case) by Jade Falcon. Results, bids all that stuff to one side for a moment, canon shows that the defenders against the Clan Wolf invasion corridor were less, by a very large margin.
If you can show me a canon source that supports Clan Wolf as being a superior Clan you have got this thread back on track because thats exactly what I asked for in the original debating. A Canon source that refutes what I can show in canon.
If you are suggesting that the MW2 team marketed their product on the basis of two of the most popular clans in that decade, then that's probably a weak argument. Just saying.
(3) Perhaps they were, I never made a direct contrast to Ghost Bear. If you'd like to build a case around that I'd be happy to discuss the merits. But they didn't run away to join the Inner Sphere, they relocated their population to the worlds they had won. Clans have changed their names, Clan Jade Wolf for example, or Clan Sea Fox. I don't see that as a direct link to any weakness but sure, happy to discuss.
(4) Well they did loose right? And the Grand Council did not support them right? Politicing has a place in Clan culture, treachery does not.
(5) You got a canon source that demonstrates this. I have several that hint at the possibility, and often these sources are ostensibily the wronged parties so they need to be looked at objectivily, but if you have something unequovicable I'm happy to discuss. But then again, I think I already told you before I personally believe Nicholas was a dictator and McEvedy got the short end of the stick. The difference is I know that opinion is not definitive in canon.
(6) I'm going to leave this one alone at the moment only because you mentioned before that you have canon sources that substaniate a view here. At the time I said I agree with your view but I will leave this uncommented on so as to not taint any case you might present with your canon sources.
(7) No, not ignore. In fact as above I don't think I have ignored anyone (that was Shar). But if you represent something as an opinion on canon and I ask for the canon source, it shouldn't be a big deal to name the source. If you don't have a canon source, it shouldn't be a big deal that we call it out as a non canon opinion.
Having said that, only your first points raised here goes towards refuting the canon that I have demonstrated. I say Clan Wolf was weaker than other Clans 3048 - 3058 because
- They lost repeatedly to other Clans in major interclan trials
- They did not earn a place in the Invasion, they were gifted it
- They had the easiest Invasion corridor facing the weakest IS army that faced the Clans
- The did not finish their battle at Tukayyid and received a JUDGED victory due to holding the objectives before Comstar forces counter attacked.
- They were found guilty by the Grand Council of treachery, their Khans found unfit to rule and Absorbed
So please tell me again how I am ignoring you when I provide patient detailed response (which admittably are not agreeing with you) to discuss points completly unrelated to the canon I have demonstrated.
Lets flip this around.
From 3048 to 3058, what are your Canon sources that convince you that Clan Wolf was a superior military force. Maybe if we start on your side we can progress.
#140
Posted 11 March 2014 - 10:23 PM
You don't argue about canon. You argue about the facts you've so deeply twisted.
PS: Read the back of your Clan Wolf: Source Book. http://www.sarna.net...Clan_Sourcebook
"In 2784, General Aleksandr Kerensky led his loyal followers out of the Inner Sphere and into exile, far away from the strife and chaos of the Succession Wars.
In 2815, his son Nicholas founded the Clans.
In 3049, the Clans returned to the Inner Sphere, determined to avenge their forefathers and restore the glory of the long-vanished Star League.
This sourcebook gives a complete history and cultural description of Clan Wolf, one of the most prominent Clans and the one that bears the name of Kerensky himself. Included is a post-Tukayyid roster of the Wolf touman and personal profiles of important Wolf leaders."
Also, as added bonus: http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Clan_Wolf
"Clan Wolf proved themselves expert warriors: they annihilated Clan Wolverine and absorbed Clan Widowmaker, long before their successes in the invasion of the Inner Sphere."
Shall we continue on this? Or shall I place you on my ignore list now and save myself the trouble of doing it after your next post? You'll have the honors of being the first, and only, person on my ignore list if this is the case. (Which should say something.)
(Also, if you really want to see something special. Look at the posts that are liked. Either, you are presenting twisted facts (possible, but unlikely I think), or your presentation stinks to the high heavens. Either way, I don't see you getting very many likes in this thread. Personally, I think it's more presentation and personality.)
10 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users