Tesunie, on 12 March 2014 - 08:58 PM, said:
Okay... did they by some chance have an agreed upon time limit for this trial? Capture your targets before x date? Could Comstar (who also agreed with Wolf, and the clans agreed with wolf) have wanted to prevent farther losses for an already won trial (Comstar already won) (1). Not to mention, every time Comstar did press, they got repelled... By your own quote there (if it is accurate, which I still am presuming it is still, strangely enough).
And you JUST proved our point for us. Comstar AND Ulric both agreed to end the trial. Together. Ulric didn't call the trial. Neither did Focht. THEY called off the trial together, ending it. Can you not see this? This means that Wolf was awarded a victory at the end of the trial.(2) They also were the only clan force to actually manage to take their two objectives...
Problem is, the oh so great Grand Council agreed with Vlad, which means they passed it in the above statements. Also, it appears as though Vlad did not see Ulric as a traitor, and neither did it appear that most of the other clans did. (3) As, if they really did, Clan Wolf would have been on the "to be annihilated" (4) list, just like Clan Wolverine.
Question for your example:(5) Does that mean that when someone says it's canon, and quote it from several novels and source books, that it isn't canon? Cause, they did quote it, and you said it wasn't canon...
And we haven't been saying your information isn't cannon either, unlike what you have been doing to us. However, you only seem to want to tell the parts of the canon that you want, (6) and not give the whole story. Hence, I call it a skewed view of canon. You tell just enough to be believed, but not enough to say what is really going on. Wanna know what I call it? A half truth.
(1) So if you want to make an argument based on Canon, go for. I only know what the canon says but those are plausible scenarios. I don't see it in canon, and if its just a fantasy scenario then we can disregard it from a canon assessment, but you make your point. Go for it. Until then, What canon says is that Clan Wolf warriors were denied a firm and final outcome from their efforts on the field one way or the other.
(2) Something that I never suggested otherwise. Can you not see THATS NOT THE POINT. The point is and remains that some people point to the fact that Clan Wolf was the only Clan that was AWARDED a victory at Tukayyid as proof of Clan Wolf's military superiority. They say they were the only Clan seizing both objectives without acknowledging the objectives were the easiest ones to take. What Canon says is that they were awarded the victory, BUT THE BATTLE WAS NOT FINISHED. What canon says is that it was the ONLY BATTLE NOT FINISHED. Therefore, I say that arguing the military superioirty on the basis of a battle Clan Wolf did not actually finish IS NOT PROOF of Clan Wolf's superiority.
(3) After the event, many people had different views. ON THE DAY the leaders of Clan Wolf where unfit to rule (or dead) and hence their absorbtion was conducted in the Clan manner. Some people think Widowmaker got a bum run (lady by the name of Natasha Kerensky) but it doesn't change the outcome of that trial.
(4) They were Abjured, which is the same thing in many ways.
(5) No, you still reading what you want to read. If a Canon Sourcebook says the sky is Blue, I think the Sky is Blue. If a Canon Novel contains a guy saying the sky is green, I think the sky is still Blue, and he's got something wonky going on with his eyes.. If the Novel says the guy is looking at a Green Sky, I would call that a conflict in canon and something to debate (ie, why is it Green there and Blue there, time of year, funny clouds, etc etc).
Novels are stories and obviously different characters in those stories are going to have conflict going, its the BT world. My point (which is far from ignoring anyone) is that just because someone says its true, that don't make it true.
(6) Seriously, I make a statement of view and back it up with canon and I'm a douchebag because I don't put up every other single canon reference? Did you think about that. If you don't agree with my Canon, I have invited time and time for you (or anyone) to offer something up. No one has on the key points. If you don't have canon to support your view it means one of two things. Either there isn't any and your view is not based on Canon or there is some but it's not available to you or I think it's not supportive of the point. It's not really my job to argue against myself is it?
All of this is kind of more of your "attack the poster cause I have nothing to dispute him" and I get that making me look silly is for many people a way to counter an argument. They cannot prove their point, but if the other guy is silly then they must be right.
I think Clan Wolf between 3048 and 3058 is weak (not the weakest as some have suggested) and not the military 'top dog' that many people claim it be in Canon. I make this claim not on what canon personalities say or do not say, I make it on the canon events that are recorded.
Clan Wolf Lost major interclan trials between 3048 and 3058, dare I say they lost all major interclan trials they partook in. I gave examples (Refusal of Invasion, Refusal War) If you think they didn't, show me the major interclan trials they won.
Clan Wolf did not earn its place in the Invasion corridor. All other Clans had to bid and trial for a spot but Clan Wolf was appointed one as the holders of the Kerensky legacy. Got a canon source that disputes this, happy to review it.
Clan Wolf's Invasion corridor was opposing the weakest of the IS armies the Clans would face during the Invasion, evidenced by virtue of the number of major (regiment plus) defenders they engaged (they simply did not fight as many large battles as other Clans). Got a Canon source that refutes that, happy to hear it.
Clan Wolf did not progress significantly quicker during the primary stages of the Invasion even against the weakest IS opposition. Refer my table of planets and attacks from Canon sources. Got a canon source that refutes that, lets hear it. (and please, telling me they took more planets after Ulric set 4 clans against each other and gave Clan Wolf a free run is not going to be a winning argument here)
Clan Wolf suffered from poor leadership, specifically a Khan that was set upon his personal goals and using / manipulating Clan Wolf to things they would not normally undertake. Also, this same Khan would go on as Il Khan to prove to a traitor to the Clans and sabotage their Invasion of the Inner Sphere. Got some canon to dispute this (and I'll concede some people have presented some good stuff on this subject so far). bring your canon on.
Clan Wolf was absorbed and the warriors who represented the 'best' Warden Wolf had to offer fled a Circle of Equals and were found unfit to be part of a Clan society and abjured. Got some canon that refutes that, happy to reconsider.
No where in these views do I make a claim that any other specific clan is superior, nor do I say that Clan wolf is 17 out of 17. What I do say is that Clan Wolf is weak, not as strong as others.
What I do say for the OP's benefit is that if you want to join a Clan that loses a lot to other Clans, struggles to keep up the pace against 5th grade oppostiion, will never promote you on your merit unless you suck up to the boss and he might throw you into a battle you don't want to fight because he doesn't want to defend himself, then Clan Wolf is for you. They also have Timberwolves and a snazzy emblem and in 3058 they get a real leader who is trying real hard to make something happen.
Edited by Craig Steele, 12 March 2014 - 09:55 PM.