Of course everyone who plays likes this idea, it means more premium time for the same amount of money. But the idea that "well if its like this, that means they get more people buying that must mean its good for them as well as me" is way to overly simplistic.
If they were to sell the $10 30 day package and allow it to only be used when you play it would very likely double (who knows what the actual stats are but I feel this is a low estimate if anything), the average time it lasts for the players who would be buying these packages anyways. That means there revenue from these packages is halved. That is no small potatoes and would require the added benefit to double their sales just to break even. Is it possible this would happen, sure. But simply stating well if x product cost less more people would get it so that must be a good idea doesn't represent the whole picture of what PGI needs to take into account.
While obviously yes, I would love them to let the premium accounts only count on days I play. But I do think that offering different lengths of time to buy, and # of win/# of games played bonuses, which give excellent flexibility, is fine.
Edited by BongoBong, 06 August 2012 - 03:30 PM.