187 replies to this topic

[LawDawg]

DaZur, on 08 April 2014 - 09:28 AM, said:

[Throws white glove on the floor]... How dare you sir, this is an outrage! You have impugned my honor and I will not stand for it!

I demand restitution!... Preferably in small untraceable denomination please.

1 Milllllllllllion C-Bills inbound good sir. Watch out for the Pink dye packs.

[DaZur]

SLDF LawDog, on 08 April 2014 - 09:34 AM, said:

1 Milllllllllllion C-Bills inbound good sir. Watch out for the Pink dye packs.

Now I have to consider you a "friendly" because you at least warned me about the dye packs!

[LawDawg]

AdamBaines, on 08 April 2014 - 09:29 AM, said:

Man....why do I keep reading these useless threads? I think I have a sickness, maybe a fetish.....for terrible threads that only complain about how the game is not addressing THEIR needs and their idea of what is good game play.

I wonder if there is a 12 step program for this? If so, at least I have finished step one....admitting I have a problem....

As with most of these Re-PETE (i know) threads, I just come in to see what this guy is going to bring new to the table. Its never anything new, and why he hasn't seen (sure he has), the other threads about the same TOPIC. He felt he to have his voice heard, Name in LIGHTS!! So I'm help him along in my own little way by keeping his post up top.

[LawDawg]

DaZur, on 08 April 2014 - 09:39 AM, said:

Now I have to consider you a "friendly" because you at least warned me about the dye packs!

We cant have that, hold 1............intel say's..........

Marik's symbol has many shades of "PINK" its been reported.....well off pink..........dont call it "Purple", Put the Pink dye to good use sir

<EDIT> Thread officially DE-Railed

Edited by SLDF LawDog, 08 April 2014 - 09:46 AM.

[Mystere]

Sandpit, on 08 April 2014 - 09:32 AM, said:

You're a forum sadist

I think the word you are looking for is "masochist".

[DaZur]

Mystere, on 08 April 2014 - 09:47 AM, said:

I think the word you are looking for is "masochist".

Aren't we all a little in order for unrepentant effort to keep this game fun?

[Fut]

YueFei, on 07 April 2014 - 09:55 PM, said:

You shouldn't move from cover to cover in view of the enemy unless it's a really short distance, like between 2 buildings. It's something it took me a long time to learn. If possible, back away for a couple hundred meters, locate a path that covers you the entire way towards your intended destination, and then move toward the next piece of cover you wanted to use. You make a kind of "U" shaped maneuver. Yeah, the shortest-distance between two points is a straight line, but that doesn't mean you should use it.

It seriously baffles me that more people don't seem to realize this.
Movement in this game is extremely important. Not only do you have to think about where you want to be, you have to consider the best possible route - not simply the quickest route.

Edited by Fut, 08 April 2014 - 10:05 AM.

[AdamBaines]

Joseph Mallan, on 08 April 2014 - 09:30 AM, said:

How many steps from your computer is your TV, fridge or Front door?

Too many or not enough, depending on the day ;-)

[Koniks]

HellJumper, on 07 April 2014 - 09:25 AM, said:

nope..from camp warriors i mean...just stick back almost all match till a mistake is made by some player (yours or theirs) and then fall back to your turret cover and wait their so enemies can come in to kill you...while all the time raining lrms on each other and staying behind a rock/building....

i hope i cleared it?

I'd suggest playing Conquest or Skirmish instead. The turrets on Assault have limited game play much more than improved LRM boats have. Most of the maps are so small that there's only one path that isn't exposed to turrets. That limits flanking opportunities.

[Mystere]

SLDF LawDog, on 08 April 2014 - 09:41 AM, said:

As with most of these Re-PETE (i know) threads, I just come in to see what this guy is going to bring new to the table. Its never anything new, and why he hasn't seen (sure he has), the other threads about the same TOPIC. He felt he to have his voice heard, Name in LIGHTS!! So I'm help him along in my own little way by keeping his post up top.

The major consequence of being brought up in a "Everyone is a winner!" environment is that one thinks of himself/herself as a very special snowflake above all else.

[Dez Telinov]

To the OP, here is a tip or two. Find a nice rock, sit behind it for abit. Do not rush, let the impatient "teammeats' die. Use your team! Watch the flow of battle. This game is all about letting the other guy die first. Excuse me...I got to go cry.

[AdamBaines]

Mystere, on 08 April 2014 - 09:47 AM, said:

I think the word you are looking for is "masochist".

Now all I need to complete my cycle of crazy masochist fueld self-loathing is RoadBeer to come in and make a whitty/slap-you-in-the-face post.......

Yessss.....sooooo gooooood.

[DaZur]

Fut, on 08 April 2014 - 10:05 AM, said:

It seriously baffles me that more people don't seem to realize this.
Movement in this game is extremely important. Not only do you have to think about where you want to be, you have to consider the best possible route - not simply the quickest route.

QFT +1

It's functional understanding of combat maneuvering to either gain advantage or avoid a situation that poses a disadvantage... And "yes" very few people grasp this concept.

I blame all FPS preceding MW:O...

For some strange reason players seem to presume "big stompy robots" means you can wander around with impunity and not expect to get your arse handed to you.

Big stompy robots need to utilize cover and concealment and to take evasive maneuvers and to exercise tactical maneuvering as much as any bare-arse grunt in the mud... IMHO, even more so considering the relative size disparity.

[LawDawg]

Mystere, on 08 April 2014 - 10:10 AM, said:

The major consequence of being brought up in a "Everyone is a winner!" environment is that one thinks of himself/herself as a very special snowflake above all else.

Your right sir, but these "Threads" generally shut down the OP, then turn into a fun fest. Putting all his QQ to rest and making him wonder why? WHY for the love of sweet baby ( your god here) he just didnt post in one of the other 100 threads. <AMEN>

[AlmightyAeng]

AdamBaines, on 08 April 2014 - 10:13 AM, said:

Now all I need to complete my cycle of crazy masochist fueld self-loathing is RoadBeer to come in and make a whitty/slap-you-in-the-face post.......

Yessss.....sooooo gooooood.

Use a non-sequitur. Repeatedly. That shit is like CRACK for Roadbeer.

[Joseph Mallan]

DaZur, on 08 April 2014 - 10:20 AM, said:

QFT +1

It's functional understanding of combat maneuvering to either gain advantage or avoid a situation that poses a disadvantage... And "yes" very few people grasp this concept.

I blame all FPS preceding MW:O...

For some strange reason players seem to presume "big stompy robots" means you can wander around with impunity and not expect to get your arse handed to you.

Big stompy robots need to utilize cover and concealment and to take evasive maneuvers and to exercise tactical maneuvering as much as any bare-arse grunt in the mud... IMHO, even more so considering the relative size disparity.

FYI... We wore Cammys when being shot at in the mud!

How Undignified!

[AdamBaines]

Ghost Badger, on 08 April 2014 - 10:35 AM, said:

Use a non-sequitur. Repeatedly. That shit is like CRACK for Roadbeer.

Ah yes....The fallacy of the undistributed middle is always the subject of his ire.

[Trauglodyte]

Joseph Mallan, on 08 April 2014 - 09:29 AM, said:

Oddly enough... I'd have killed him from cover with a single shot to his Mellon from up to 500M out... while he harmlessly sprayed M60 ammo all lover the place!

IMPOSSIBLE!!!

[DaZur]

Joseph Mallan, on 08 April 2014 - 10:44 AM, said:

There's something different about you but I can't put my finger on it.... Did you shave?

[Roadbeer]

AdamBaines, on 08 April 2014 - 10:13 AM, said:

Now all I need to complete my cycle of crazy masochist fueld self-loathing is RoadBeer to come in and make a whitty/slap-you-in-the-face post.......

Yessss.....sooooo gooooood.

Ghost Badger, on 08 April 2014 - 10:35 AM, said:

Use a non-sequitur. Repeatedly. That shit is like CRACK for Roadbeer.

AdamBaines, on 08 April 2014 - 10:44 AM, said:

Ah yes....The fallacy of the undistributed middle is always the subject of his ire.

How did I get drug into this shit?