Frame Rate Drop: Caused By Cpu Bottleneck?
#1
Posted 11 June 2014 - 08:34 PM
Motherboard: MB BIOSTAR|Hi-Fi A85S3 A85X FM2 R
CPU: AMD A10-5800K APU with Radeon HD
GPU: GeForce GTX660
Memory: 8gb TEAM TLBD38G1600HC9DC01 RT
OS: Windows 7 64 bit
So anyone have any ideas?
#2
Posted 11 June 2014 - 09:35 PM
#3
Posted 11 June 2014 - 09:36 PM
Here's your CPU's benchmark http://www.cpubenchm...D+A10-5800K+APU
Lower than a lot of intel i3 dual cores.
#4
Posted 12 June 2014 - 05:25 AM
#5
Posted 12 June 2014 - 06:00 AM
ninjitsu, on 11 June 2014 - 09:36 PM, said:
Here's your CPU's benchmark http://www.cpubenchm...D+A10-5800K+APU
Lower than a lot of intel i3 dual cores.
That website is quite misleading on alot of things..
Grey, have you installed the bulldozer hotfix yet?
#6
Posted 12 June 2014 - 07:14 AM
Lordred, on 12 June 2014 - 06:00 AM, said:
That website is quite misleading on alot of things..
Grey, have you installed the bulldozer hotfix yet?
In pretty much anything, and especially CPU-dependent applications, a higher-clocked i3 SB/IB/HW will perform better than that 5800K. It's 2 "real" threads and 2 hyperthreaded threads on the Intel side vs. 4 CMT threads on the AMD side. There is no reason to fanboy something if it isn't going to help the OP. A core i5 or i7 from the Haswell refresh family will unlock a lot of the performance the OP is missing from that GTX 660. I have an i7 (SB) and a 660Ti, and I never dip below 50fps. I run high settings with very high textures on DX11, and can tell I am GPU-limited. The OP is definitely CPU limited currently.
#7
Posted 12 June 2014 - 09:21 AM
#8
Posted 12 June 2014 - 09:37 AM
Personally what I would do is get on to a z97 intel board and then buy the best processor you can afford. A z97 board will give you a good amount of upgrade-ability because they support the upcoming gen5 intel chips.
#9
Posted 12 June 2014 - 11:02 AM
xWiredx, on 12 June 2014 - 07:14 AM, said:
Not fanboying, I am asking a legitimate question. Does the OP have the hotfix installed or not? Win 7 will assign workloads to the bulldozer/piledriver cpus in funny ways without it.
The hotfixs are not automaticly installed through the windows updater. You must install them manually.
Edited by Lordred, 12 June 2014 - 11:04 AM.
#10
Posted 12 June 2014 - 11:11 AM
Lordred, on 12 June 2014 - 11:02 AM, said:
The hotfixs are not automaticly installed through the windows updater. You must install them manually.
can you post a link to the hotfix please, just interested in reading about the issue your talking about here.
Op see this thread a few things their may help you out
Edited by Shamous13, 12 June 2014 - 11:29 AM.
#11
Posted 12 June 2014 - 11:36 AM
#13
Posted 12 June 2014 - 03:12 PM
Lordred, on 12 June 2014 - 11:02 AM, said:
The hotfixs are not automaticly installed through the windows updater. You must install them manually.
He doesn't have a bulldozer chip...It's a Trinity based chip.
#15
Posted 12 June 2014 - 03:38 PM
I experiance the same thing and it has been getting worse for a few months. I have been playing since Closed Beta and back then I could manage 40Fps, medium settings, on a Wolfdale Core 2 Duo and GTX260
I currently run an FX8350 @4.7 - 5.0Ghz, on an SSD that reads and writes at 1100Mb/s along with Crossfired 7770's. 8Gig DDR3 1600Mhz / Win7 64 Pro. Maxed settings - AA.
Every other game I own is pretty much maxed out at 1080p but MWO has been degrading steadily for some reason.
Strangely enough I get the same sort of FPS in 1024x768 as I do in 1920x1080p?? The games FPS varies from 60 (Max for my monitor) to 19 somtimes and seems to bounce when looking around let alone in a firefight.
I still notice textures popping in and out, things fading in etc.. I half think that the maps details are being streamed from the MWO server and this is causing it but thats just me. I have tried all sorts of tweaks, fixes and Crytek comands in the .cfg files but to no avail.
I hope the Dev team can get an optimisation pass in sometime soon!
#16
Posted 12 June 2014 - 03:50 PM
Lordred, on 12 June 2014 - 03:38 PM, said:
The FX X1XX are Zambezi
The FX X3XX are Vasheri
Yes, they use piledriver cores. Not bulldozer. From my understanding, piledriver fixed the issues with bulldozers and the Windows hotfix shouldn't have any effect.
#18
Posted 12 June 2014 - 04:15 PM
Lordred, on 12 June 2014 - 04:04 PM, said:
I tried the hotfixes on my FX 6300 and never saw any improvements. Perhaps OP will have more luck. Are these the hotfixes you are referring to? http://www.tomshardw...s-hotfixes.html
From my experience, Intel chips run the game much better. I saw a huge performance boost going from my FX 6300 to an i5 4670k, both at 4ghz. I think the stronger Intel cores can deal with the flawed coding better, but that's just my opinion.
#19
Posted 12 June 2014 - 04:21 PM
Graphics settings often don't seem to matter. I sometimes wonder if the game is failing to turn several of them off.
I hover around 25-40. Except in the cave of course.
I get 3 in the cave.
I no longer go cave.
Of course, I"m only running an
AMD FX-6100 Six-Core
10 GB DDR3
GTX650 Ti
I lose 1-5 fps every major patch. So I'll need to upgrade in about 6 months to a year to keep playing. Not sure where the performance goes, but it disappears fast.
Edited by DanNashe, 12 June 2014 - 04:25 PM.
#20
Posted 12 June 2014 - 04:27 PM
DanNashe, on 12 June 2014 - 04:21 PM, said:
Graphics settings often don't seem to matter. I sometimes wonder if the game is failing to turn several of them off.
I hover around 25-40. Except in the cave of course.
I get 3 in the cave.
I no longer go cave.
Of course, I"m only running an
AMD FX-6100 Six-Core
10 GB DDR3
GTX650 Ti
I lose 1-5 fps every major patch. So I'll need to upgrade in about 6 months to a year to keep playing. Not sure where the performance goes, but it disappears fast.
You've got an old bulldozer chip, the hotfixes should help you if you haven't applied them.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users