
me like!
Edited by Dagger6T6, 20 June 2012 - 12:36 PM.
 1
 1
 
	
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:34 PM

Edited by Dagger6T6, 20 June 2012 - 12:36 PM.
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:35 PM
 
					
					Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:37 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:39 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:46 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:47 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:47 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:48 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:48 PM
 
  
  but then as I read the readout and looked closer... 3 ML's and 2 LRM-15's.... Sounds familiar... *looks up catapult description* 4 ML's and 2-LRM-15's... Did we really need mechs that are so similar?
 but then as I read the readout and looked closer... 3 ML's and 2 LRM-15's.... Sounds familiar... *looks up catapult description* 4 ML's and 2-LRM-15's... Did we really need mechs that are so similar?
					
					Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:49 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:49 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:50 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:51 PM
 Aesaar, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 PM, said:
Aesaar, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 PM, said:
 Battalia, on 20 June 2012 - 12:48 PM, said:
Battalia, on 20 June 2012 - 12:48 PM, said:
 
  
  but then as I read the readout and looked closer... 3 ML's and 2 LRM-15's.... Sounds familiar... *looks up catapult description* 4 ML's and 2-LRM-15's... Did we really need mechs that are so similar?
 but then as I read the readout and looked closer... 3 ML's and 2 LRM-15's.... Sounds familiar... *looks up catapult description* 4 ML's and 2-LRM-15's... Did we really need mechs that are so similar?Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:51 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:52 PM

 SquareSphere, on 20 June 2012 - 12:35 PM, said:
SquareSphere, on 20 June 2012 - 12:35 PM, said:
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:52 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:53 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:53 PM
 Aesaar, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 PM, said:
Aesaar, on 20 June 2012 - 12:47 PM, said:
Edited by Blackfire1, 20 June 2012 - 12:55 PM.
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:53 PM
Posted 20 June 2012 - 12:55 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users