Hawkeye 72, on 13 July 2012 - 05:26 PM, said:
When a member of yours requested the unit be included in the stats, I went to your website. Most of the domain areas were restricted for nonregistered users, and nonregistered users are not allowed to post on your forums. I was unable to find any unit roster that was available to non-members, and I have a policy of not personally asking unit commanders for their unit size to avoid being a pest/solicitor.
I don't register on unit sites either, because there are so many and I don't need to wade through that many confirmation emails.
Therefore, I took the member count of the forum and used it instead. I only included your unit because someone asked me to, and if I had known you guys would throw this big a stink about it, I would never have done so.
Next time I update, I will be sure to leave you guys out to avoid further complaints.
This is the stupidest thing for multiple reasons. Let me count the ways....
1) Asking for unit information. Uh... what? If someone asks me about my unit, I'm going to respond. "Hey I want to include your unit on a survey and was wondering how big is it?" "Oh I'd be happy to tell you. Right now we're at 67 members. What kind of survey?" "Oh just making a graph that shows the distribution of members." "Oh cool. Hey do you need a bit of help? Oh you're including unit icons, hey do you want me to give you a clean one? What file format do you prefer?"
^ Best secret way to get information ever. If a CO doesn't want to talk about their unit, they're not doing a good job. It's free advertisement, and it's a painless PM/post in the recruitment thread. Ask first is the best method. If they don't respond, THEN you can "estimate" (or leave them as unknown, as if they don't want to share then it's justifiable to leave them out at that point). If anything it gives you more rep too because you get to be known by all the units as "that stats guy" and get a working relationship with all the corps. Seriously, anyone who wants to know anything about the ELP, from member count to policies, needs merely PM me. As leader it's my job to handle that stuff.
2) I don't give a wooden nickle about our stats, it's more it appears the entire system is incorrect (I mean, really, if truly were butthurt about our numbers, wouldn't we be happy to have it thought we have more members than we really do?). I don't even know where you got 109 from, we only have 103 people registered on the site. From what I've heard member counts on the others are incorrect too. Your system is flawed, and notifying you of this is the only proper response. You should look into other methods of collecting numbers on mercenary units. I suggest using the method I said in #1.
3) Attempts to prove your system is right and then saying you're going to intentionally leave a group off? Hmm... letting personal bias affect your numbers... yes! You're now a professional
statistics guy, just like in real companies. Keep up the good work!