Viktor Drake, on 22 July 2014 - 04:55 PM, said:
Well I just got done doing a small test on my Stormcrow. The results were that I couldn't see one bit of difference between using the Mark I vs the Mark III TC.
Total average damage done was near identical with the Mk III only having a slight edge of about 3%. However in component destruction, which you would naturally expect to be higher with the Mk III, the Mk I saw about a 10% edge.
Now I want to say it was just a very short test so this is not conclusive but for something that I have to give up an additional 2 tons and 2 crit slots for, I really need to see a significant difference even in a short test. Honestly based on what I am seeing, I would rather devote those extra 2 tons to DHS because they actually make a very noticeable difference unlike the TC.
Total average damage done was near identical with the Mk III only having a slight edge of about 3%. However in component destruction, which you would naturally expect to be higher with the Mk III, the Mk I saw about a 10% edge.
Now I want to say it was just a very short test so this is not conclusive but for something that I have to give up an additional 2 tons and 2 crit slots for, I really need to see a significant difference even in a short test. Honestly based on what I am seeing, I would rather devote those extra 2 tons to DHS because they actually make a very noticeable difference unlike the TC.
Well, using component destruction isn't the best measure. That only counts Arms, STs, Legs, Etc... and not ammo, weapons or equipment.
There isn't really a way to tell if you are getting more worth from your crits.