So How Are You Outfitting Your Warhawks Nowdays?
#1
Posted 17 August 2014 - 05:03 PM
#2
Posted 17 August 2014 - 05:05 PM
Been thinking of switching it to cLPLs, dropping some DHS and increasing the computer to MK IV.
The WHK B, I run as LRM 50 + Artemis with TAG, CAP and 4x cERMLAS.
Edited by Ultimatum X, 17 August 2014 - 05:07 PM.
#3
Posted 17 August 2014 - 05:50 PM
#4
Posted 17 August 2014 - 05:51 PM
#5
Posted 17 August 2014 - 05:59 PM
#8
Posted 17 August 2014 - 06:28 PM
2-erll
2-erppc
Clrm10
AMS
TC-5
Prime is the only one I I could put a loadout I was satisfied with, A,B annoyed me very much couldn't figure out how to put AMS on them .without gimping their loadout .
Edited by SgtMagor, 17 August 2014 - 06:29 PM.
#9
Posted 17 August 2014 - 06:30 PM
Edited by Kassatsu, 17 August 2014 - 06:31 PM.
#10
Posted 17 August 2014 - 06:34 PM
This fit looks like butt to veteran MWO players. Nevertheless, it's the configuration that got me through to mastery of my Warhawk-B, with tweaks made to fit on the other variants. I've had a lot of success with it, including my first 1000+-damage game. Until they nerfhammer the crud out of C-ERML, this is likely going to remain my chief Warhawk puncher.
#11
Posted 17 August 2014 - 06:50 PM
PRIME (I)
Gauss (3.5t ammo), 2x ERML, 2xLPL, MK2 TC
The mediums and large pulses sync together really well, and it all runs fairly cool.
PRIME (G)
2x UAC/10 (7.5t ammo), 2x SRM4 (3t ammo)
This one I run for funsies. If you run out of that much ammo you've done your job
Config -A
2x LRM15,1x LRM20 (8.5t ammo), 3x ERML, 2x ERLL
I kept the ERLLs for some long range direct fire.
Config -B
2x ERPPC, 3x MPL, 2x SRM6 (2t ammo), LRM 15 (2t ammo)
Still experimenting with this one but I've had some pretty good runs in it.
#12
Posted 17 August 2014 - 06:57 PM
I tried 4 LPL + TC6 after that. Surprisingly, it was an almost decent loadout. The Clan LPL is bearable only because of its fairly long range, but otherwise it's kinda bleh...
#13
Posted 17 August 2014 - 07:06 PM
The Prime has alternated between that (keeping its LRMs) and a stock Prime - even with the ERPPC nerf.
I haven't found a useful B yet. ^^;
#14
Posted 17 August 2014 - 08:54 PM
WmLowFlyer, on 17 August 2014 - 06:27 PM, said:
Both the cERPPC and the cER LLAS were pretty great choices for the Heatsink with legs that is starved for hardpoints.
The cERPPC is at least servicable. The cERLLAS is just awful, its living in the best apartment in Flamer-town.
I actually still chuckle when someone uses the cERLLAS on me, and it just spreads everywhere.
#15
Posted 17 August 2014 - 09:11 PM
I actually like it better than prenerf LL build.
#16
Posted 17 August 2014 - 09:55 PM
#17
Posted 17 August 2014 - 10:03 PM
l33tworks, on 17 August 2014 - 09:55 PM, said:
For Peacedoves, the only loadout differences come from the CT. Prime and A give extra torso twist, B gives a CT missile hardpoint.
#18
Posted 17 August 2014 - 10:06 PM
l33tworks, on 17 August 2014 - 09:55 PM, said:
Actually, it depends on the center torso. For example, only Warhawk B can do the "LRM-70" build (3 LRM-20s, 1 LRM-10); the other Warhawks don't have missile hardpoints in the CT.
Now, when I say it, it refers to the fact that I have fairly well-tuned loadouts for Prime and A; but I haven't worked out what the B should become yet.
#19
Posted 17 August 2014 - 11:26 PM
It's the only peacebird build I don't laugh at.
#20
Posted 18 August 2014 - 12:05 AM
Edited by Grantham Besat, 18 August 2014 - 12:07 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



























