data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3af11/3af119e5a5409203aa733b448d1c4b02d372ec43" alt=""
Lol @ These Try-Hards
#41
Posted 03 September 2014 - 08:33 PM
#42
Posted 03 September 2014 - 08:45 PM
Roland, on 03 September 2014 - 06:35 PM, said:
Well , the last data gathering results made by PGI (IS mechs teams vs Clan Mechs teams) showed that 90% of matches clans win.
So....yep even if they CAN....it's just a lame and cheap move.
#43
Posted 03 September 2014 - 08:48 PM
#44
Posted 03 September 2014 - 08:49 PM
Roland, on 03 September 2014 - 08:33 PM, said:
^ This. From the name & shame policy post (http://mwomercs.com/...dated-20130226/):
Quote
A: Yes, so long as it does not serve the purpose of humiliating or defaming another person. If you feel as though a post containing a scoreboard screenshot has been posted in an attempt to target, inflame or otherwise 'make fun' of a specific player or group of players, please use the forum Report function and our moderators will use their judgement accordingly.
I don't see any humiliation of the players in the screenshot.
#47
Posted 03 September 2014 - 08:55 PM
Flash Frame, on 03 September 2014 - 08:26 PM, said:
All I'm seeing is some naming...but no shaming.
The OP posted a picture of himself losing and then attempted to "shame" the winning team because they beat his team fair and square (within the rules of the game).
That's pretty funny actually.
#48
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:03 PM
but uh.. ggclose
#49
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:06 PM
However, I think the point the op was trying to make is that the team fielded is pretty much fully optimized. They chose full sets in each weight class (except assault) of what are pretty much considered the best or near best mech in each class.
Ember
SCR
TBR
DWF (and one Warhawk for giggles I guess).
As for the comment about damage. A good team doesn't need players doing 800 damage ... in fact a focused team will kill opponents so fast that no one will get the opportunity to do 800 damage since the opponents will die too quickly.
Edited by Mawai, 03 September 2014 - 09:06 PM.
#50
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:08 PM
but skill? In this game? Pbbft-fartfartfart-
#51
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:21 PM
#52
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:27 PM
@OP they're House of Lords players, they are a very competitive team that collectively share a strong play-to-win mentality, and always bring their A-game and A-mechs to a match, as a team.
As a team they are exceptionally hard to beat, and have a very high win-percentage. To that end, I would suggest you try your best regardless. To my mind, when up against a very skilled comp team (228, SJR, HoL, for example) I would always be happy to get 1-2 kills and respectable performance from myself, no matter what the final match score ends up as. You can't win every match, but you can certainly put up a good fight!
#53
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:42 PM
#54
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:54 PM
You're slipping, bub.
#56
Posted 03 September 2014 - 10:08 PM
#57
Posted 04 September 2014 - 05:47 AM
strikebrch, on 03 September 2014 - 08:45 PM, said:
So....yep even if they CAN....it's just a lame and cheap move.
so people should just stop using the package they paid IRL money for?
#60
Posted 05 September 2014 - 07:24 AM
Bishop Steiner, on 04 September 2014 - 07:07 PM, said:
Using them on your entire team i mean and getting a huge advantage ; an proven advantage during the IS vs Clan test.
Numbers never lie.
If you want to discuss about rights and stuff then you're losing your time and don't understand my point which is supported by an official result of...
90% OF MATCHES WON BY PURE CLAN MECHS TEAMS. <----This is why we are getting the 12 vs 10 matches planned for a future patch .
This is the kind of stuff why it's called an exploit because now that people know this fact (90% C-WINS 12vs12) they MAY abuse of this and abusing on something to win is LAME AND CHEAP in the name of "I CAN DO IT" ; pls dude don't make me come to specifics ok you're aware of this.
19 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 19 guests, 0 anonymous users