Jump to content

Tranverse Is Officially Dead


24 replies to this topic

#1 SmithMPBT

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 793 posts

Posted 03 October 2014 - 08:32 AM

PGI just announced the cancellation of the Trannyverse crowdfunding on their website and is apparently following thru on their promise of refunding pledges. RIP ill conceived SC clone. Back to work on MWO PGI.

#2 BARBAR0SSA

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,136 posts
  • LocationCalgary, AB

Posted 03 October 2014 - 08:34 AM

There was another post about this and they are looking for alternative funding methods.

#3 EvilCow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 2,234 posts

Posted 03 October 2014 - 08:34 AM

That was not hard to predict...

#4 Tastian

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 768 posts
  • LocationLayton, UT USA

Posted 03 October 2014 - 08:45 AM

https://transversega...?which=J73XE4MP

#5 SmithMPBT

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 793 posts

Posted 03 October 2014 - 09:46 AM

View Postshad0w4life, on 03 October 2014 - 08:34 AM, said:

There was another post about this and they are looking for alternative funding methods.

It would take a Saudi prince high on ******* to even considering funding this.

#6 Darth Futuza

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,239 posts

Posted 03 October 2014 - 10:17 AM

And now for their second game, they can make a singleplayer mechwarrior reboot campaign like they originally wanted.

#7 Livewyr

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 6,733 posts
  • LocationWisconsin, USA

Posted 03 October 2014 - 10:39 AM

View PostDarth Futuza, on 03 October 2014 - 10:17 AM, said:

And now for their second game, they can make a singleplayer mechwarrior reboot campaign like they originally wanted.


And draw in What new playerbase? We are already here... (Those that specifically only want a 1-player campaign are probably not enough to justify splitting the revenues from the BT crowd between two fullcost projects.)

#8 Darth Futuza

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,239 posts

Posted 03 October 2014 - 10:42 AM

View PostLivewyr, on 03 October 2014 - 10:39 AM, said:


And draw in What new playerbase? We are already here... (Those that specifically only want a 1-player campaign are probably not enough to justify splitting the revenues from the BT crowd between two fullcost projects.)

Shhh...you're stepping on dreams.

#9 r4plez

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 812 posts
  • LocationFoundry

Posted 03 October 2014 - 09:59 PM

Wow, thats a surprise.

#10 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 04 October 2014 - 08:43 AM



#11 Green Mamba

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Shredder
  • 1,659 posts
  • LocationNC,United States

Posted 04 October 2014 - 09:10 AM

I sure hope alternative funding doesn't mean Mech Packs :(

#12 Alreech

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Little Helper
  • Little Helper
  • 1,649 posts

Posted 05 October 2014 - 06:16 AM

View PostDarth Futuza, on 03 October 2014 - 10:17 AM, said:

And now for their second game, they can make a singleplayer mechwarrior reboot campaign like they originally wanted.

They can use the MWO Mechs.
They "only" have to make new maps, add AI to the game, have to pay for voice actors...
How much do you want to pay for a single player Mechwarrior ?

But to be fair:
A working AI system would be also nice for MWO (AI controlled Tanks & Infantry ) for example in the training grounds.

#13 Lily from animove

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Devoted
  • The Devoted
  • 13,891 posts
  • LocationOn a dropship to Terra

Posted 06 October 2014 - 01:04 AM

View PostLivewyr, on 03 October 2014 - 10:39 AM, said:


And draw in What new playerbase? We are already here... (Those that specifically only want a 1-player campaign are probably not enough to justify splitting the revenues from the BT crowd between two fullcost projects.)


I don't think that transverse ever targeted the MWO players as a target group.

#14 Alreech

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Little Helper
  • Little Helper
  • 1,649 posts

Posted 06 October 2014 - 11:28 AM

View PostLily from animove, on 06 October 2014 - 01:04 AM, said:


I don't think that transverse ever targeted the MWO players as a target group.

The target player group for Transverse would be all space sim fans who don't play Elite Dangerous or Star Citzien or EVE (Valkyre)... ;)

Bur from a strict economical point of view it would be sensible to create a own Game with license free IP to have a second source of income if the Mechwarrior License expires.
It's just not sensible to create a own Space Sim what has to compete with Games like ED or SC.

Edited by Alreech, 06 October 2014 - 11:33 AM.


#15 Jacmac

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 828 posts

Posted 06 October 2014 - 11:52 AM

Yes, Trans♂♀verse crowd-funding is dead, but it begs the questions:

1. Will PGI continue development anyway ( and what exactly does taking it behind the curtains mean)?
2. If development will continue, where will the money to develop Trans♂♀verse come from?

#16 McHoshi

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,163 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationGermany

Posted 06 October 2014 - 01:16 PM

I wish them good luck with this project at all... UE4 is a good engine to build some amazing spacesim... ;)

#17 Darth Futuza

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,239 posts

Posted 07 October 2014 - 11:16 AM

View PostAlreech, on 05 October 2014 - 06:16 AM, said:

They can use the MWO Mechs.
They "only" have to make new maps, add AI to the game, have to pay for voice actors...
How much do you want to pay for a single player Mechwarrior ?


Eh?

I think $50 would be reasonable for a one time fee.

#18 Nightmare1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,636 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationPeeking over your shoulder while eating your cookies.

Posted 08 October 2014 - 05:22 PM

How disappointing! I was really looking forward to Transverse too! :(

Maybe it will resurface in the future. I'm really wanting to find a good space MMO to replace Star Trek Online. That game sure has gotten stale and is pushed over towards the P2P side so hard that I have to tilt my screen to play it.

#19 Jiyu Mononoke

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 251 posts

Posted 10 October 2014 - 01:38 PM

I don’t see why PGI didn’t (or doesn’t) use the new game concept/engine to make an online MechWarrior MMO where you are basically playing your pilot as a character in the new universe, when your character goes in to combat, it could tie in to the existing MWO game, and enter combat. With the new game, they could include community warfare, drop ships, space travel, character quests etc. It could provide extension to story lines in and around lore, locations, planets etc. They have an enthusiastic player base sitting right here, and would likely have instant support by providing a MechWarrior based persistent universe to complement the existing MWO game. If done right, the two games would support and compliment each other, yet it wouldn’t be 100% necessary to play both games, like if your character wasn’t a mech pilot for example, or if you simply enjoy a periodic round or two of stompy robot shooter after work. Playing both however, could give your pilot various skills and tweaks that could be used in the MWO game, similar or as an extension to the existing pilot skills.
Well, it was just my thought…. Realistic or not, it could have been fun if done that way.

#20 Argann

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 281 posts

Posted 10 October 2014 - 02:06 PM

View PostSmithMPBT, on 03 October 2014 - 09:46 AM, said:

It would take a Saudi prince high on ******* to even considering funding this.



I request, you delete your implications against the house of Saud. It is a crime that is not tolerable.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users