#1
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:32 AM
Who here sacrifices the max KPH for that extra half-ton or ton (or more) of weight for extra goodies?
I do the same with armor though I might shave a half-ton from my head depending on the mech (and if I feel the risk is worth it).
Not saying either way is right or wrong, I'm just curious. Discuss.
#2
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:35 AM
#3
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:35 AM
To:
cdlord, on 29 September 2014 - 06:32 AM, said:
I've run firestarters with max engines and with a few notches less than max and I've always found that I liked the speed more than the extra carrying capacity.
#4
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:37 AM
Problem with lights is that they need that speed in a game like this. People try and deny it, but the fact is this game has a big twitch shooter element to it, and anything as lightly armoured as a light BattleMech is easy to pop unless it has the ability to leave someone's sights quickly.
What I really wish is that lights, and I suppose all 'Mechs, had more options for viability. I'm not entirely sure how, but I wish lights could have values other than just speed. Stealth, or something like that. Other "mechs too, the 'meta', which essentially shows the one 'perfect' builds that top anything else competitively. But I suppose that all ties back into role warfare.
Edited by AUSwarrior24, 29 September 2014 - 03:52 PM.
#5
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:39 AM
It's all how interconnected everything is in Battletech. Effect speed, weapons have to be completely modified.
#6
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:41 AM
#7
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:42 AM
When rolling at 50km/h, you don't need 5 second to pass on the side of a building like it's the case.
The maps are too small, the speed are slow.
I don't have the impression of running at 130km/h in my Raven.
I still like that game, but it isn't has good has the impression gaved by MMLiving Legend, PGI should really have tryied to make something more that way.
#8
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:49 AM
For example, I started playing around with this to see how the Clan lights might function before their release and was so impressed that my Raven 4X uses this build to this day. It's still one of my better lights. It's high mounted hardpoints and extremely small, narrow frontal profile make it a phenomenally good sniper platform that is easily overlooked by larger mechs.
My OXIDE has remained largely unmodified as well, changing only when they started allowing half tons of ammo (it got a bit more armor at the cost of 50 SRMs). It's slower than advised for lights, but as a close support striker for the main battlegroup, it's a fantastic, hard hitting platform that can really devastate the enemy team.
Super fast dogfighter/scout mechs are valuable, don't get me wrong, but they're hardly the only role that light mechs can perform effectively. Lights are often overlooked in a brawl, they usually have a very low profile and great hitboxes. With all the clan mechs running around, pinpoint autocannons (the bane of a light's existence) are fewer and farther between. Are slower lights going to show up in the highest echelons of competitive play? Probably not. The meta is too established in the minds of the comp players for them to really want to experiment with lights in a different role. Are slower lights both fun and effective? Absolutely. You just need to get out of the "squirrel" headspace of their speedy cousins.
Edited by Josef Nader, 29 September 2014 - 06:50 AM.
#9
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:52 AM
#11
Posted 29 September 2014 - 06:55 AM
Too fast: All of the ECM equippable lights (IMO the max speed of the RVN-2X/4X should be swapped with the 3L)
Too slow: Clan lights, and the non-ECM equippable Ravens. Of course the only way to make clan lights faster is to let engine swap or implement MASC. I think I'd be ok with them introducing MASC for clans only at least until they can figure out the strategy for IS lights with MASC.
#12
Posted 29 September 2014 - 07:04 AM
I could go faster if I ditched the Artemis on my two SRM4 launchers, but I Like the tighter more concentrated SRM pattern with Art. I figure 132 is fast enough.
So, I try to compromise with speed vs firepower. Maybe if I made more of a light hunter, I would go for max speed.
#13
Posted 29 September 2014 - 07:05 AM
Light pilots like to say "Speed is life" but imo that applies to every mech, just to different degrees. Unfortunately, because of convergence armour means little in MWO and speed is vastly more important. If a Dire Wolf walks in front of a couple of enemy it gets cored in under 5 seconds. If a Spider does the same it barely notices unless caught by a lucky big weapon/alpha strike.
In fact i just watched a Spider on Alpine running about in the open firing at my team with an ERLL and spotting for his teams LRM's, while under fire from at least a lance for around 5 minutes before he ran off over a hill (no idea how much damage he took as he had ECM).
I mastered a few IS lights (Spider, Commando, Raven) with stock engine/weapons and can honestly say the survivability of those mechs is overwhelming. I'd say that about 80% of my deaths were by AC20, 15% by Gauss, and 5% by other weapons.
I even commented on the forums that i found the Commando to have very high survivability and people thought i was crazy.
I guess it comes down to playstyle. I use the lights speed to move from cover to cover and always try to flank the enemy to stay out of their LOS. I think most people who complain that lights are underpowered actually mean they can't just brawl in the open against bigger mechs. As far as I'm concerned they shouldn't be able to. Any other class does that and even if they win the fight they are generally wrecked by the end.
Attacking assaults from the rear is one thing, but just dancing around in front of the enemy and not getting almost instantly killed is another.
Imo lights are OP now, and have been almost since closed beta...but then i don't just run around in the open.
#14
Posted 29 September 2014 - 07:08 AM
#15
Posted 29 September 2014 - 07:13 AM
#16
Posted 29 September 2014 - 07:14 AM
Lights are very unpopular, because they take so much work to get their damage out, often constantly having to peck the whole match. Take away their speed and what do they have? Why play a slow light when you could play a medium that is near as fast, or play a heavy that packs a ton more of a punch? As the numbers show, heavies are preferable to the general population to the point that they are willing to have longer wait times to play them.
#17
Posted 29 September 2014 - 07:14 AM
But the part that wins out pictures a Jenner going 112kph trying to survive twin Gauss Rifles. (They stand little chance now at their speed. They would stand NO chance going slower.)
#18
Posted 29 September 2014 - 07:14 AM
On the other hand, spiders and commandos can get away with 125kph. They are small enough that the lag shield keeps them safe. Firestarters are in a similar boat. They can run tons of weapons with a slightly slower engine, but have favorable hitboxes and an overall small size.
Jenners are a mixed bag. I run my Oxide between 125-140, and seem to do better in general when a Jenner runs 140. That center torso is just too easy to hit.
#19
Posted 29 September 2014 - 07:17 AM
Clint Steel, on 29 September 2014 - 07:14 AM, said:
Lights are very unpopular, because they take so much work to get their damage out, often constantly having to peck the whole match. Take away their speed and what do they have? Why play a slow light when you could play a medium that is near as fast, or play a heavy that packs a ton more of a punch? As the numbers show, heavies are preferable to the general population to the point that they are willing to have longer wait times to play them.
Better hitboxes and lower priority when the enemy is firing at you. Unless you are the only target on the field or sporting ECM, lights are bottom dog when it comes to getting shot at. Even mediums draw a lot more fire, and with a slower light you can pack comparable firepower to a medium mech while maintaining that seemingly non-threatening nature of a light mech. People just kind of look straight past you unless you're the only target on the field, and if you are careful in how you play, you can take strong advantage of that.
Edited by Josef Nader, 29 September 2014 - 07:17 AM.
#20
Posted 29 September 2014 - 07:17 AM
Green Mamba, on 29 September 2014 - 07:13 AM, said:
Is this in team matches or something? I can honestly say lights rarely (if ever) get 1-shotted in any solo matches I've played since closed beta.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users