How much would you pay for a Warhammer?
#21
Posted 25 June 2012 - 11:03 AM
I pretty much think that any mech introduced into the game should be available to all some way or another. I don't like the idea of forcing people to pay money to get a chassis. Maybe to get a specific variant, but mostly I think anyone should be able to obtain any chassis if they work at it.
#22
Posted 25 June 2012 - 12:02 PM
The problem is they would need to blur the mech for non paying Costumers...
#23
Posted 25 June 2012 - 12:07 PM
I'd much rather have the Maddy, or the Archy.
As for paying for them?
Really?
Also, royalties?
What royalties?
Harmony Gold isn't going to release their grip on them - at least not the ones they actually have.
So the Locust, Shadow Hawk, Griffin, Scorpion, Wolverine, Thunderbolt, Goliath, and BattleMaster are all safe and available for you.
#24
Posted 25 June 2012 - 12:12 PM
#25
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:28 PM
#26
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:41 PM
However, I don't agree with making them only available to people who pay for them.
That would instantly turn the game into 'pay to win' (ignoring for a moment whether or not the Unseen are actually 'stronger' than other 'mechs).
If anything, cover the costs of bringing the Unseen into the game with profit made by all microtransactions combined.
#27
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:46 PM
Artifice, on 25 June 2012 - 08:33 AM, said:
I must have missed that. Do you (or anyone reading this) happen to have a link to where the developer's said that?
It's my understanding that the Unseen mechs have given the BattleTech franchise legal trouble time and time again.
#28
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:49 PM
#29
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:53 PM
MinionJoe, on 25 June 2012 - 01:46 PM, said:
I must have missed that. Do you (or anyone reading this) happen to have a link to where the developer's said that?
It's my understanding that the Unseen mechs have given the BattleTech franchise legal trouble time and time again.
So either they don't include them, or they've come to terms with Harmony Gold (unlikely, imo).
HG was unwilling to let CGL make use of them in CBT, so why would they relent for a computer game?
#30
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:54 PM
#31
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:54 PM
Artifice, on 25 June 2012 - 08:33 AM, said:
I'd like to see that statement as well. . all the information i have is from BTWiki at this link . .
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Unseen
#32
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:56 PM
Alizabeth Aijou, on 25 June 2012 - 01:53 PM, said:
HG was unwilling to let CGL make use of them in CBT, so why would they relent for a computer game?
That's kind of my point. HG sounds like a PITA to work with. So I was surprised with another poster said that the dev team had no "legal problems" with including the Unseen. I was just asking for the source.
#33
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:57 PM
#34
Posted 25 June 2012 - 01:58 PM
#36
Posted 25 June 2012 - 02:00 PM
http://www.amazon.co...r/dp/B000J3AN0U
or one of these?
http://ironwindmetal...roducts_id=1716
#37
Posted 25 June 2012 - 02:18 PM
#38
Posted 25 June 2012 - 02:23 PM
#40
Posted 25 June 2012 - 02:38 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

















