Jump to content

Ecm Vs Bap


82 replies to this topic

#81 Zerberus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 3,488 posts
  • LocationUnder the floorboards looking for the Owner`s Manual

Posted 11 November 2014 - 09:24 AM

View PostUltimatum X, on 10 November 2014 - 05:31 PM, said:



Posted Image


Posted Image


Posted Image


Posted Image





This is what happens when force multipliers are allowed to stack indiscriminately.

^^ Becasue no team EVER did the exact same thing with ECM, no, impossible, nothing that happened in the last 2 years took place, no 3xD-DC, 3x3L + 3xSHD 3x 3d companies ever existed, especially not in competitive play. ;)

When the competitive scene (or the playerbase as a whole) regards a piece of equipment as an "absolutely must have" to the point that at least half the group is sporting them, there`s a 95% chance that it`s broken.

That`s why people stacked feral druids for the earliest Sinestra Kills in WoW.
That`s why during CS Beta stages the AWP /Deagle combination was absolutely dominant and is to this day often banned on public servers
That`s why the grenade launcher was de facto the best weapon period in the original doom betas.
That`s why Gauss/PPC Dire Whales were directly targeted with the 2+2 mechanic.

The list goes on and on and on for as long as games (NOT just video games) have existed, and is actually a very large part of how rules and regulations eventually start to manifest themselves as standard. In the early days, it was legal to score a basket off the tipoff in basketball, kick straight for the goal instead of a "backwards pass" in soccer, or score a field goal from teh kickoff in american football. Then it was abused, and rules were designed to discourage /forbid it.

The alternative is seen in tennis: Tennis rackets are in fact "broken"... you can legally play without one, but nobody in their right mind would, because the advantages are total game changers. So instead of banning them, you deem them explicitly legal and instead regulate their design. ;)

Edited by Zerberus, 11 November 2014 - 09:29 AM.


#82 Bartholomew bartholomew

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 1,250 posts
  • LocationInner sphere drop point

Posted 11 November 2014 - 09:25 AM

Been playing and BAP does not punch ECM worth anything. ECM still wins the electronic warfare contest with no contest.

#83 Davegt27

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,081 posts
  • LocationCO

Posted 11 November 2014 - 12:06 PM


The computer controls the game

That’s why there are so many opinions on how things work
One guy is in the buff cycle and everything works as advertised

Another guy is in a nerf cycle and his stuff works like crap

This is all done for balance (that's what you guys wanted right)

This wide (or wild) fluctuations in the game is the real reason people come the forum to vent/cry

One match LRMs from God are coming down on you, the next that poor DW standing 100m from you is catching it

The old guys had to learn to get good at the game but the newer folks can’t get good because one match they are a hero the next they are a zero

Remember balance (you win some you lose some, that's what you wanted right)









1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users