SinnerX, on 25 June 2012 - 02:45 PM, said:
I'll be honest, this is common sense to anyone who hasn't played WoT. I know I haven't, and hearing people talk about how low level(aka new player starting tanks) can't even damage high level tanks begs a big "***?" from me. That sounds like just plain horrible game design, imo, and I don't know why everyone assumes MWO will copy it. None of the past MW games used this broken mechanic, as far as I can remember.
It's not really a broken mechanic. It was designed on WOT to follow what real life showed. The Early Tanks lacked the guns with the Punch to go through the Heavy Later years tanks. A tier 2-3-4 Tank Could not PEN the armor of a Tier 8-9-10 Tank. Period. They just lacked a big engouth gun. This was true in WWII. Which made things like the Tiger dangrous. They had better range, and could PEN most things at longer ranges.
WOT's match maker is designed to TRY and put alike tiers togther. Even then, some tanks just would be unable to Penentrate orther tanks. Which followed pretty close to what gun they carried.
In MWO, a Med Laser does Damage. Period. A Mech has so much armor in it's leg. Does not matter if that Laser is shot from a Altas or from a Jenner. It's still going to burn off the same amount of armor. If a Jenner is good at Bobbing and weaving around buildings, and coming in for quick shots then getting out of the way. Yes that jenner can kill a Atlas. It's just going to take a lot more shots from the Jenner to do it. Where the atlas just needs a couple of good shots to burn out part of the Jenner. Of course The Atlas also packs a AC/20 which does a LOT more damage than a Med Laser.. So thats only going to need 1 or 2 good hits on the Jenner..
Basiclly the concepts of WOT and MWO are vastly diffrent. WOT is not broken, it's concept is just different. And makes sense for what it does. People need to stop comparing them.