Jump to content

Banshee Wtf


16 replies to this topic

#1 badaa

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 735 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 05:52 PM

  • this is how the energy hard points should look like.Posted Imageusing anything other than ppcs this is what u get. Posted Image this makes me sad


#2 Brody319

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ominous
  • The Ominous
  • 6,273 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 06:12 PM

#CatapultGate

#3 bluepiglet

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 359 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 06:21 PM

So many broken things in this game, and this is what you WTF for.....

This made me sad....

Edited by bluepiglet, 15 November 2014 - 06:21 PM.


#4 El Bandito

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 26,736 posts
  • LocationStill doing ungodly amount of damage, but with more accuracy.

Posted 15 November 2014 - 06:22 PM

Have a Like for the wrestling reference. :)

#5 badaa

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 735 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 06:24 PM

View Postbluepiglet, on 15 November 2014 - 06:21 PM, said:

So many broken things in this game, and this is what you WTF for.....

This made me sad....


this is what i know this is what i understand 0_,,i,,

#6 CocoaJin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,607 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted 15 November 2014 - 06:44 PM

Look fine to me....lasers wouldn't need a barrel like projectiles or PPCs(remember, PPCs are firing highly charged blobs of matter, so conceivably a barrel would aid in shot accuracy and cohesion). All you need is an aperture with a flex mount to help in aiming/convergence.

#7 Ultimax

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 6,979 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 07:37 PM

My issue is that the placement makes no sense.

I still struggle to comprehend why Battle Tech mechs have so many nipple and lower rib mounted weapons.


All 3 of those Energy and all 3 ballistics should be high mounted, that's my WTF.

Edited by Ultimatum X, 15 November 2014 - 07:37 PM.


#8 Team Chevy86

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Clamps
  • The Clamps
  • 1,074 posts
  • LocationDue North

Posted 15 November 2014 - 08:47 PM

The PPC cannons looks great. What bothers me most is they use the same generic little laser box over and over. A .5 ton small laser and 7 ton Large pulse laser fire out of the same size chamber lol

#9 Lhaim

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • 60 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 08:58 PM

The one at the bottom is ok but those 2 on the shoulder are beyond poor.

#10 Macster16

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Heavy Lifter
  • Heavy Lifter
  • 576 posts

Posted 15 November 2014 - 10:56 PM

What makes me go WTF about the Banshee is the stupid order it fills hardpoints when adding weapons. Take the 3E for example:

- It has 4 ballistics on the left ST with 2 mounted low and 2 mounted high
- It has 3 energy on the right ST with 1 mounted low and 2 mounted high

Now logically, you would prioritize the higher hardpoints over the lower ones so that as you add weapons, the higher ones get filled first before the lower, but for some stupid reason it's the other way. This means that with the 3 AC5 build, you get 2 mounted low and 1 high (as you can see in the OP's pic) rather than an ideal 2 high, 1 low. Same goes for the right ST and it makes no sense. Because of this, I'll put a dummy sml on my right ST to take up the low hardpoint so my 2 LLs or 2 LPLs end up on the high ones. Before quirks I sometimes used to use 2 UAC5s where I would put 2 dummy mgs on so the UACs would be on the high mounts. Too bad you can't do it with the 3 AC5 build since it takes up all the crits on the ST.

Makes no sense.

#11 Mechwarrior Buddah

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 13,459 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 15 November 2014 - 11:13 PM

Anyone remember when they had the stacking issue on hunchies?

#12 Mister Blastman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 8,444 posts
  • LocationIn my Mech (Atlanta, GA)

Posted 15 November 2014 - 11:25 PM

No wubshee??? :(

#13 Cyborne Elemental

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,957 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 15 November 2014 - 11:39 PM

Those hardpoints keep the lower pods with PPC because they don't want a 95 ton Jagmech hillhumping with shoulder PPC's.

Getting 2 LPL or 2 ERLL up high on the Banshee doesn't seem to be much problem, but PPC's could be.

Either way, I like having highpoint energy for the much more compact ERLL or medlas.

Just like any other energy hardpoint on most mechs, most have the same pod for all lasers, small/spl/med/mpulse/LL/ERLL/LPL, and then a unique one for PPC's.

And if all else fails, because.. reasons.

All sorts of funny things like that happen though.

Take this as example. HBK-4g
2 AC-5, one is gigantic, the other looks like a toothpick in comparison.
Posted Image

Edited by Mister D, 16 November 2014 - 12:23 AM.


#14 badaa

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 735 posts

Posted 16 November 2014 - 05:18 PM

View PostCocoaJin, on 15 November 2014 - 06:44 PM, said:

Look fine to me....lasers wouldn't need a barrel like projectiles or PPCs(remember, PPCs are firing highly charged blobs of matter, so conceivably a barrel would aid in shot accuracy and cohesion). All you need is an aperture with a flex mount to help in aiming/convergence.

small black squares do not a laser make

#15 Augustus Martelus II

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 476 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMontréal, QC Canada

Posted 16 November 2014 - 05:20 PM

BANSHEE Go Home!....You re DRUNK!!!

Edited by Augustus Martelus II, 16 November 2014 - 05:22 PM.


#16 Moonlander

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ominous
  • The Ominous
  • 684 posts
  • LocationCocoa Beach, FL

Posted 16 November 2014 - 05:51 PM

I hate my Cataphracts because it lacks unique weapon art. Regardless of what ballistics you use, you only see the same look.

#17 Agent 0 Fortune

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,403 posts

Posted 16 November 2014 - 07:11 PM

View PostMoonlander, on 16 November 2014 - 05:51 PM, said:

I hate my Cataphracts because it lacks unique weapon art. Regardless of what ballistics you use, you only see the same look.


It could be worse. I could be so, so much worse.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users