Why Take An Atlas Over A King Crab?
#121
Posted 07 August 2015 - 08:21 PM
#122
Posted 07 August 2015 - 08:26 PM
#123
Posted 08 August 2015 - 04:16 AM
Flash Frame, on 09 December 2014 - 07:09 PM, said:
Because you LIKE the atlas.
JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE WHO CARES IF IT'S OPTIMAL... IF IT'S TOP TIER.
God I'm so tired of hearing people go on and on about how "This mech sucks because it's totally outclassed by X."
Who the flying fet cares?! Just use what you like, and quit complaining. I swear I come to these forums and all I see is bitchmoangroanwhinecryrage.... there's so little positivity here. And I mean, sure, part of that comes from all the BS PGI's pulled over 3 years... but good lord, there has to be a smidge of good cheer left in these forums right?
You just wait and get shocked when this game goes further its planned way to be a comp game. Appearently thats the easiest way to get as much profit as you can without spending much effort into the game. in order to polish it or add content for example
#124
Posted 08 August 2015 - 04:36 AM
JC Daxion, on 09 December 2014 - 06:04 PM, said:
you are ******* stupid. King crab arms are extremely heavily armored. With the quirks they arms have more total HP than the side torsos.
#125
Posted 08 August 2015 - 04:57 AM
#126
Posted 08 August 2015 - 06:51 AM
It's just the second biggest one going. (The AWS is the sorriest)
#127
Posted 08 August 2015 - 07:09 AM
MauttyKoray, on 07 August 2015 - 07:26 PM, said:
That was always my thoughts and opinion of the Atlas, it may be different for some of you, but the Atlas definitely needs torso durability increase quirks.
Nope. Nothing should outshoot a Daishi. Thats her only claim to fame. You dont facetank a direwolf in ANYTHING. not even another dire wolf. But if you sneak up behind it while hes not paying attention....It would be nice if the Atlas didn't run so hot with those brawling configs.
#128
Posted 08 August 2015 - 09:20 AM
#129
Posted 08 August 2015 - 11:39 AM
#130
Posted 08 August 2015 - 12:27 PM
#131
Posted 08 August 2015 - 12:55 PM
Desolator, on 09 December 2014 - 06:15 PM, said:
Go ahead pop my arms off I don't care, still packing 95.60 points of firepower.
http://mwo.smurfy-ne...cc97f4ff5113cfd
Diabolical...
#132
Posted 08 August 2015 - 01:12 PM
RedDevil, on 08 August 2015 - 11:39 AM, said:
Oh, you still see me on the field. You don't have to worry about that.
ThisMachineKillsFascists, on 08 August 2015 - 04:16 AM, said:
As by many defined als old tech, obsoleted and even complete utterly waste of tonnage. You may laugh, cry and curse at my old machine. I will accept victory and defeat, You see me, i see you. I will try to pound you to the ground. I, piloting behind the glass eye will try within my powers to shred you piece by piece till your face is nothing more left then a pile of hot melted steel. I will not rest untill i have fullfilled my role as a butcher, cheese slicer or a ripper.
Even when i fail then i will hide in a dark corner and let a small bright sun ray shine on my skull shaped head and shout via intercom: "Soon™ we will meet again"
This is me, piloting for the love of the ultimate 100 ton Kerensky- build death machine.
Edited by Sarlic, 08 August 2015 - 01:14 PM.
#133
Posted 08 August 2015 - 02:07 PM
Bront, on 09 December 2014 - 10:59 PM, said:
ofc its easier... with less and worse hardpoints. my 000 AC40 crab runs a 360 standard. 0000 2gauss+3LL use a 325. the 4uac5 build got a 320 in it.
and i run 350 on both AS7-S with AC20 4SRM6, AS7-BH 6MPL AC20.
Edited by Corrado, 08 August 2015 - 02:08 PM.
#134
Posted 08 August 2015 - 02:18 PM
Edited by DuoAngel, 08 August 2015 - 02:18 PM.
#135
Posted 08 August 2015 - 02:23 PM
Edited by Kh0rn, 08 August 2015 - 02:31 PM.
#136
Posted 11 August 2015 - 01:29 AM
Unless it gets Zeus tier armor quirks it's low slung weapon placement, hitbox shapes that make it really easy to clearly target components, and relatively low hardpoint count relegate it to third stringer tier at best.
You tank far better in the 80 ton Zeus than the 100 ton Atlas.
#137
Posted 11 August 2015 - 01:36 AM
Sarlic, on 08 August 2015 - 01:12 PM, said:
As by many defined als old tech, obsoleted and even complete utterly waste of tonnage. You may laugh, cry and curse at my old machine. I will accept victory and defeat, You see me, i see you. I will try to pound you to the ground. I, piloting behind the glass eye will try within my powers to shred you piece by piece till your face is nothing more left then a pile of hot melted steel. I will not rest untill i have fullfilled my role as a butcher, cheese slicer or a ripper.
Even when i fail then i will hide in a dark corner and let a small bright sun ray shine on my skull shaped head and shout via intercom: "Soon™ we will meet again"
This is me, piloting for the love of the ultimate 100 ton Kerensky- build death machine.
ThisMachineKillsFascists, on 11 August 2015 - 12:41 AM, said:
Yup he is.
I on the other hand...
#138
Posted 11 August 2015 - 01:47 AM
Mawai, on 09 December 2014 - 06:00 PM, said:
The KIng Crab I received has 6! arm mounted ballistic hard points ... 2 energy, 2 missile and an AMS. One of the other KIng crabs appears to have 2 ballistic, 4 energy and 4 missile. The frontal profile on a King Crab looks to be a bit smaller than an Atlas ... hard to say for sure since it might be lower and wider. Otherwise they start off with basically the same armor and structure.
The KIng Crab would seem to have greater choice in loadouts and more devastating loadouts.
Unless the KIng Crab hit boxes somehow make it much more vulnerable than an Atlas ... why would I ever drive one of my Atlas' over the King Crab?
(Not a troll ... I am actually curious since the King Crab at least appears to be strictly better than an Atlas ... not sure yet how it compares to a Dire Wolf though I think the DW still has the edge since 6 CUAC5 and similar builds are hard to beat ... though the King Crab can do 2xGauss + 2xERPPC for lots of PPFLD fun ... if you can get the coordination correct)
Important stuff like fun and nostalgia...
#139
Posted 11 August 2015 - 01:58 AM
The fact that it's the best looking Assault mech in the game (if not the entirety of Battletech) doesn't count?
I know, i know. I'm vain, but I only pilot mechs, i can [Redacted].
Edited by GM Patience, 11 August 2015 - 01:58 PM.
#140
Posted 11 August 2015 - 02:00 AM
Juodas Varnas, on 11 August 2015 - 01:58 AM, said:
The fact that it's the best looking Assault mech in the game (if not the entirety of Battletech) doesn't count?
I know, i know. I'm vain, but I only pilot mechs, i can masturbate to.
You would be surprised. Some people find the Atlas ugly!
9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users