Sandpit, on 18 December 2014 - 12:00 PM, said:
No dude, you made a statement of fact. I'm asking you for your data the backs up that statement of fact. You implied that many units are ONLY using this one attack tactic to win many planets.
It's an erroneous statement because you don't have access to any data that WOULD back that up even if it were true
As I guessed, you're not letting me get away with making a statement without providing fact, BUT ONLY, because you disagree with my view point. The OTHER idiot, making even more egregious statements but not providing proof, it was ok for HIM to do that because HE apparently is in agreement with YOUR view point.
In the web vernacular: "Hypocrite much?"
Anyway, I COULD provide those facts, even dig through the vids I recorded where we came up against certain teams who would play as indicated, but as I stated before, there a policies on this forum against "name and shame", I've already been hit once for accidentally doing it, I'm not about to do it again.
To parrot others who responded so snarkily to me, 'Go find it for yourself, it ain't hard.'
Just log in, go to the map, find the areas where certain teams 'own' lots of planets and start defending and see what tactics they use.
Quote
You're trying to imply that if a team uses a successful tactic they're exploiters.
No. I'm trying to stating that if the ONLY tactic they EVER use is to zerg rush with 'mechs with KNOWN hit box issues, constantly feathering jump jets to take advantage of KNOWN hit registration issues, THEN they are purposely exploiting all of the weakest mechanics in the game.
To do it once or twice to prove there's a problem, and then move on to other tactics, that's BETA testing.
To do it over and over and over, match after match after match, JUST to get your unit's tags on more planets than anyone else so as to inflate your epeen, an exercise in egobation, THAT is exploiting.