20517 replies to this topic

[Terror Teddy]

We still don't have a good defensive mech for River City.

URBANMECH!

[SgtMagor]

must have Banshee, never saw one in MechWarrior before.

[Butane9000]

They only want us to ask 1 question? So I'm asking one single question.

Let it be answered!

[Joe Mallad]

I'm still saying banshee but I'd like to see the Battlemaster also at some point being its now used again as the cover logo for all battletech books.

Edited by Yoseful Mallad, 26 February 2013 - 09:31 AM.

[Strucker]

Unstickied?

[BlackAce]

Hmm, so the short list is; Zeus, Victor, Banshee, Cyclops, Hatamoto, Dabuko/Mauler or Charger.

Zeus and Cyclops are the favourites.

Edited by BlackAce, 26 February 2013 - 01:05 PM.

[Hawks]

My money would be on the Cyclops, as a command/electronic-warfare/role-warfare specialist.

[Odanan]

Tomorrow or burn!

[Lonestar1771]

Odanan, on 26 February 2013 - 05:11 PM, said:

Tomorrow or burn!

Damn straight!! That lame *** excuse Niko Snow is dropping is pathetic at best (even though it's most likely true), just shows how out of touch IGP really is, considering the staff stickies get read once at most and they usually contain information that is less than useful.

[AceTimberwolf]

Maybe they Burned down the Harmony Gold Offices in Hollywood and all evidence of their so called "rights" to property which they were told by Japan means nothing. So in the Process They gained the rights to make the Unseen once more

[Colddawg]

If they redesign the unseen enough there shouldn't be an issue IMO

[Lonestar1771]

Not trying to be rude here but please STOP BRINGING UP THE UNSEEN MECHS. PGI has said many times over that they will NOT be dealing with any of that, whether redesigns are viable or not.

[Merky Merc]

They're just waiting til the bushwacker is available to announce it as the next mech.

[Thirdstar]

http://mwomercs.com/...pinning-policy/

Alright, lets see about getting this topic pinned again.

YOU CAN DOOOOOOOO EEEEEEEEET

[Belorion]

Lonestar1771, on 26 February 2013 - 08:22 PM, said:

Not trying to be rude here but please STOP BRINGING UP THE UNSEEN MECHS. PGI has said many times over that they will NOT be dealing with any of that, whether redesigns are viable or not.

Actually I think their standard response to the unseen is no response.

[Magik0012]

Unseen.

Belorion, on 26 February 2013 - 08:28 PM, said:

Actually I think their standard response to the unseen is no response.

Paul's last response that I saw in Q&A #32 (?) was "I can't comment on that."

[Antonio]

King Crab revolution! I'm sorry but the mechs expected to be #20 are not as interesting(in my opinion of course). I'm sure they can settle the matter of the AC20 crit splitting too.

[Ens]

according to this http://mwomercs.com/forums/topic/101410-new-topic-pinning-policy

....theres a way to report this thread to its former masterful stickiness!!! am i right?

lets do this!


and gimme Zeus already plz :|

Edited by Ens, 27 February 2013 - 03:10 AM.

[AceTimberwolf]

Colddawg, on 26 February 2013 - 08:19 PM, said:

If they redesign the unseen enough there shouldn't be an issue IMO

Actually According to last statement from Catalyst they are Unseen again. They said so at their last convention too but they are trying to work around it

[Norris J Packard]

PLEASE, GARTH, PLEASE COME TO WORK TODAY.