Cimarb, on 24 April 2014 - 10:29 AM, said:
That being said, I think if they had made the packages like this it would have been more customer-friendly, though I totally understand why they tiered them the way they did, based upon popularity.
Tier 1: "choose 1 light"
Tier 2: "choose 1 medium" + tier 1
Tier 3: "choose 1 heavy" + tier 1 & 2
Tier 4: "choose 1 assault" + tier 1, 2 & 3
Tier 5: "choose 1 light" + tier 1, 2, 3 and 4
Etc.
This would have gave a little bit of flexibility in what we purchased, while still giving a reason to get higher tiers if we wanted both heavies, for example. It also would have got more people "in the door", since they could have gotten a Timber Wolf at Tier 3, and once you have made that first purchase, every upgrade after that is easier and easier to justify (do the math, it's a no brainer once you start getting premium time).
That example of yours would definitely be better than the current scheme, assuming roughly equal price to the current package deals.
Although, it's still not quite ideal for my nitpicky tastes because it's basically sending the statement "heavies and assaults are better than mediums and lights" because they're placed so high up. Kind of goes against the whole "Role Warfare" thing that this game was supposed to be built around (supposed to curtail the "arm's race" from previous MW games).