Most PGI can do is Map Vote, like we had Mode vote (for a whopping 24 hours or so). This way map selection can be biased without incurring the issues that make Map Select/Veto a bad bad BAD idea.
2
Pls Let Met Play Canyon, Crimson, Mining And Tourmaline Only
Started by LowSubmarino, Dec 23 2014 01:54 PM
43 replies to this topic
#42
Posted 25 December 2014 - 11:52 AM
Scratx, on 25 December 2014 - 08:21 AM, said:
Most PGI can do is Map Vote, like we had Mode vote (for a whopping 24 hours or so). This way map selection can be biased without incurring the issues that make Map Select/Veto a bad bad BAD idea.
Map vote good idea
Map selection bad idea
It's been brought up in every one of these threads. I've brought it up several times myself. It seems like the only ones who ignore that suggestion are the ones who only want their idea of fun employed regardless of how it would negatively impact the entire game and community.
#43
-
-
- Ace Of Spades
- 907 posts
Member
Posted 25 December 2014 - 01:23 PM
Map exclusion is the way to go. Each player should be able to 'exclude' one or two maps; match gets made, map with most 'votes' (or maybe top two votegetters) are out of the random pool for that drop.
finally, no more alpine
finally, no more alpine
#44
Posted 25 December 2014 - 01:46 PM
AssaultPig, on 25 December 2014 - 01:23 PM, said:
Map exclusion is the way to go. Each player should be able to 'exclude' one or two maps; match gets made, map with most 'votes' (or maybe top two votegetters) are out of the random pool for that drop.
finally, no more alpine
finally, no more alpine
Well thankfully pgi doesn't agree and many in this thread don't either
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
