Reforging The Star League
#741
Posted 12 February 2015 - 06:14 AM
Let them argue among themselves lads, we've got work to do.
And to the nSL and MS- good luck to you both, there are many battlefields in MWO and I have no doubt we will see you both with us and against us. Forward the Dragon!
#742
Posted 12 February 2015 - 08:40 AM
Lord Ikka, on 12 February 2015 - 06:14 AM, said:
Let them argue among themselves lads, we've got work to do.
And to the nSL and MS- good luck to you both, there are many battlefields in MWO and I have no doubt we will see you both with us and against us. Forward the Dragon!
Sorry to see you go, but I know this was a vote your whole High Command made. Hopefully we can see you aligned with us in the future.
GLHF!
#743
Posted 12 February 2015 - 11:22 AM
#744
Posted 12 February 2015 - 04:10 PM
#745
Posted 13 February 2015 - 07:00 PM
#746
Posted 13 February 2015 - 09:04 PM
Strykewolf, on 13 February 2015 - 07:00 PM, said:
MercStar made it pretty clear a while ago that they were Ghost Bears first and always and would end up back there eventually. That's why it never really made much sense to me that they were so interested in becoming part of the Star League. From where I sit, by their behavior, it looks like all MS really wants is to put their tag on as many rocks as they can manage no matter who they're fighting and to upset the status quo wherever they can find it, turning ally against ally and destroying any alliances and NAPs that they can.
#747
Posted 13 February 2015 - 09:44 PM
#748
Posted 13 February 2015 - 10:27 PM
Yes, personally, I will. <<shrugs>>
#749
Posted 13 February 2015 - 10:44 PM
My issue is with the design PGI has created. MS is following the money. PGI has created a system that makes mercs a disruption to faction tactics and strategies, not a benefit or a commodity. That's not the fault of groups like MS but an issue with game design.
If there was a financial incentive for them to coordinate with a factions overall strategy they would love to I'm sure. Currently there is not only no benefit but in some ways a benefit to do the opposite.
#750
Posted 14 February 2015 - 03:08 AM
Valar13, on 13 February 2015 - 09:44 PM, said:
Not necessarily judgement, see below:
MischiefSC, on 13 February 2015 - 10:44 PM, said:
My issue is with the design PGI has created. MS is following the money. PGI has created a system that makes mercs a disruption to faction tactics and strategies, not a benefit or a commodity. That's not the fault of groups like MS but an issue with game design.
If there was a financial incentive for them to coordinate with a factions overall strategy they would love to I'm sure. Currently there is not only no benefit but in some ways a benefit to do the opposite.
You're right, and stirring up the entire Inner Sphere into a giant orgy of violence plays to MercStar's advantage in that regard. They gain nothing by supporting the nSL because we're looking to stop inter-House violence and focus on fighting the Clans. That removes 5 (Marik/Davion, Marik/Steiner, Marik/Kurita, Davion/Kurita, Kurita/Steiner) active combat fronts that they can dance in and out of at leisure. Yeah, it's a failure of PGI's system that MercStar is exploiting. I can understand why. Just think it sucks they, and some others, are so determined to shoot down the nSL, which pretty much represents the biggest moment of unity we've seen among the player base since Sarah's Jenner.
#751
Posted 14 February 2015 - 09:09 AM
#752
Posted 14 February 2015 - 09:47 AM
#753
Posted 14 February 2015 - 11:44 PM
PerfectDuck, on 14 February 2015 - 09:47 AM, said:
There is no monetary benefits long term with any faction... longer contracts only provide better LP rewards, not an increase on CB, which are plentiful in any faction provided the action is continuous. Most merc's used 7 day contracts (some use 14 day ones) and move around, it's the nature to play everything we have in our drop bays. What's the point of spending upwards of $400 on clan mechs if you can't use them at all, or likewise your IS mechs, because you get stuck into one faction... I barely pug play because unless I play non-serious, I don't enjoy it, or feel rewarded by it.
#754
Posted 14 February 2015 - 11:57 PM
PerfectDuck, on 14 February 2015 - 09:47 AM, said:
i find it interesting that you seem to understand my own units internal politics better then i do.
anyways, we go where the salmon leads us. such is the life of the bear.
though i cant speak for the other units of MS, i can say SiG is happy as long as we get delicious salmon. where we get it from is secondary at best
#755
Posted 15 February 2015 - 12:19 AM
LegoPirate, on 14 February 2015 - 11:57 PM, said:
i find it interesting that you seem to understand my own units internal politics better then i do.
anyways, we go where the salmon leads us. such is the life of the bear.
though i cant speak for the other units of MS, i can say SiG is happy as long as we get delicious salmon. where we get it from is secondary at best
While I disagree with the mentality I just can't bring myself to say something bad about someone named Lego Pirate.
#756
Posted 15 February 2015 - 12:32 AM
MischiefSC, on 15 February 2015 - 12:19 AM, said:
While I disagree with the mentality I just can't bring myself to say something bad about someone named Lego Pirate.
I can. The lego Pirate was clearly inferior to the double decker couch.
Edited by Prophetic, 15 February 2015 - 12:32 AM.
#757
Posted 15 February 2015 - 06:44 AM
LegoPirate, on 14 February 2015 - 11:57 PM, said:
i find it interesting that you seem to understand my own units internal politics better then i do.
anyways, we go where the salmon leads us. such is the life of the bear.
though i cant speak for the other units of MS, i can say SiG is happy as long as we get delicious salmon. where we get it from is secondary at best
LOL
some of these guys have more "insight" than Rex.
Edited by Saxie, 15 February 2015 - 06:45 AM.
#758
Posted 15 February 2015 - 07:27 AM
This will never work. Reason for this failure of the reforming the star league or what ever you want to call this is the clear and present threat each house faction not on the clan borders and even some of them pose as a threat to each other. Heck over the past week of "supposed peace" Davions have lost planets to the Liao, Marik, and Kurita. The planets lost started at or better yet continued at the start of it. So until each house faction can either control itself or those in it this will remain a flawed idea.
My suggestion is why not each faction create its own pacts with it's bordering neighbors, and after some neighboring peace has been worked out between neighbors we can finally work to defending against the clans and eventually pushing into them.
Like I said earlier my two cents not for faction house or unit.
#759
Posted 15 February 2015 - 08:43 AM
#760
Posted 15 February 2015 - 10:17 AM
That is what the nSL is. Those among the houses with the will and the drive to make the Clans a priority do so. Those who don't are going to do whatever they were doing before. Even a majority of units is sufficient, they agree to focus first and foremost on the Clans, sending merc units there, etc. They are the ones who are going to help shape the direction that cw takes in the long run. Population shifts will end up with most is houses ending where they started relative to reach other. Marik and the great wall are the only likely exception to that.
The only thing that will really matter in the long run is fighting the Clans. That is going to be what significantly changed the map and was memorable. Everything else is just pugging.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users