So I just checked out my old Cataphract-4X, excited to see the visual customizations, and I have only one thing to say: this is probably tantamount to nitpicking, but couldn't the CTF-4X's left arm ballistic hardpoints been designed to be over-and-under like the right arm instead of side-by-side?
Both left and right arms on the CTF-4X have two ballistic slots, which means that players will likely pair their weapons -- at least one kind on both arms. I personally run with 1 gauss rifle and 1 machine gun on each arm (total of 2 gauss and 2 MG). I played with this configuration so much that my XP on this chassis has gone to the hundreds of thousands. I was bloody good with this setup, if I say so myself. I've seen other players do the same pairings with different kinds of ballistic weapons: UAC/5 and MG on each arm, AC/5 and MG on each arm, quad AC/5s, quad AC/2s, etc.
But with the visual customization and accompanying change to an uneven slot placement -- over-and-under for the right arm, side-by-side on the left arm -- running with paired weapons become literal hit-and-miss scenarios. With your weapons firing from different heights on each arm, playing with the CTF-4X now requires a lot of guesswork. When facing an obstacle (such as a rock or an ally), you're no longer sure if the low-slung MG on your left arm will hit the same thing as the high-placed MG on the right, and so on. This is especially detrimental with MWO's weapon mechanic of focusing fire into a single point on your target, regardless of what location on your mech your weapon is firing from.
PGI, please consider placing the second ballistic hardpoint on the CTF-4X's left arm into the empty space where the hand on other Cataphracts would instead be, on the same level as the "upper" slot on the right arm.
I know the Cataphract is supposed to be a "Frankenmech" in canon, but that's no reason to just be random about its weapon placements, especially considering that, in terms of hardpoints, the left and right arms are essentially identical.
Thanks!