41 replies to this topic

[Yeach]

Raeven, on 29 November 2011 - 12:18 AM, said:

The amount of damage it does, the amount of heat you suffer from firing it, the amount the weapon weighs, and the reload time. All but the damage is already worse than Large Lasers and you want to penalise the weapon more by making it a lead to hit weapon?

No weapon should have a lead time in this game, especially if they use a Cone of Inaccuracy. The balance is already built into the numbers. The highest damage weapons are limited by weight, size, ammo, heat, or range (often a combination of those).

You don't remember how little use AC weapons recieved in MW4? There were a few who had figured out the lead times of AC weapons, some to devastating effect. The rest of the rabble relied on Lasers and Missles. I personally don't want to see that again. The PPC is suppose to be top dog, until Gauss rifles come along. I'd like it to remain that way.

PPCs were lead to hit weapons in MW4... well I felt they were anyways as I could always hit with Large Lasers, I had to adjust the aim on PPCs to hit onto target (ie when you view zoom, you can actually see the PPC "bolts" have travel time to hit the target,

[Yeach]

Malavai Fletcher, on 29 November 2011 - 01:18 AM, said:

Back in the day i played on a 56k modem,there were allways people who could hit me with lead weapons,notably a guy who would constantly kick my **** at maximum range with ppc and gauss while i was in a scat.Yes there may have been lag back then,something i would think today is alot less of an issue,but a bit of lag certainly did not equal fail.

I had a few kills that way with a twin ERPPC / ERsmall Laser Cauldron-Born or Bushwacker back in the day of MW3.
Aw brings back so good memories of going against the flow of C1 ERSmallLaser Scats.

Edited by Yeach, 29 November 2011 - 01:39 AM.