

Just Avoid Cw
#81
Posted 23 April 2015 - 09:54 AM
It would be nice if PGI had some sort of system to keep extremely inexperienced pilots out of CW like disabling trial mechs.
The rest depends upon players spending the minimum effort to copy paste builds from meta mechs or practice their custom builds in normal Q until they are proficient.
#82
Posted 23 April 2015 - 11:04 AM
Joseph Mallan, on 23 April 2015 - 09:13 AM, said:
A niche of a niche?
Nicheception?

#83
Posted 23 April 2015 - 11:11 AM
Burktross, on 23 April 2015 - 11:04 AM, said:
Nicheception?

actually it would be niche-cursion or recur-niche.
Inception means creation, a thing within itself is called Recursion, its just Facebook idiots and meme generators have gotten it confused.
#84
Posted 23 April 2015 - 11:13 AM
Adamski, on 23 April 2015 - 11:11 AM, said:
actually it would be niche-cursion or recur-niche.
Inception means creation, a thing within itself is called Recursion, its just Facebook idiots and meme generators have gotten it confused.
Recurniche has a nice ring to it, then!
#85
Posted 23 April 2015 - 12:41 PM
Other than that I dont expect to much until the game has expanded the player base alot. The 4 v 4 will help also. Maybe other additions and changes.
Edited by Johnny Z, 24 April 2015 - 11:17 AM.
#87
Posted 23 April 2015 - 01:33 PM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 23 April 2015 - 10:51 AM, said:
Stone Prophet man, you wanna not have accounts just to avoid bans. They frown upon that here
Wut? Check me out in game. Im no alt account. Im a trueborborn Ghost Bear warrior here to reclaim the inner sphere from Barbarians such as yourself, freebirth scum solahma.
alternatr put: 1v1 me bbro! I declare a trial of grievance for your lies and slander!
Im on right now! Bet youll redacted out like saying youre at work or some redacted!

and ive already caught their attention. I got redacted for calling a mod redacacted redacted who do you redacted think you are are you so redacted redacted you just sit there redacted yourself? Or roughly the equivalent when they tried to redacted my name. 7 days redacted on the forums. I totally redacted deserved it.

Sorry for the ot but i thought it was pretty redacted funny...

Edited by Stoned Prophet, 23 April 2015 - 01:40 PM.
#88
Posted 23 April 2015 - 01:42 PM
Almond Brown, on 23 April 2015 - 06:38 AM, said:
So PGI's promoting CW is a Bribe? Wow. That glass of yours in quite empty. Is it a bribe when they promote PUG Weekend play too? With Prizes no less?
Just for curiosity. If PGI did not offer any Prizes for the event, would that change the Bribe angle your taking or just change how you would hate on them?
My my bit defensive aren't we, hate is such an extreme word, how about if they had designed it so it was, attention grabbing, then they wouldn't have to be creating new items, to get a workable population for an event that's well somewhat one dimensional, and likely to be filled with ghost drops, with the way even organised groups seem to be giving up on it from todays threads
Edited by Cathy, 23 April 2015 - 01:47 PM.
#89
Posted 23 April 2015 - 01:45 PM
Cathy, on 23 April 2015 - 01:42 PM, said:
My my bit defensive aren't we, hate is such an extreme word, how about if they had designed it so it was, attention grabbing, then they wouldn't have to be creating new items, to get a workable population for an event that's well somewhat one dimensional, and filled with ghost drops
2% of matches is not "filled with ghost drops"
#90
Posted 23 April 2015 - 02:46 PM
Stoned Prophet, on 23 April 2015 - 01:33 PM, said:
alternatr put: 1v1 me bbro! I declare a trial of grievance for your lies and slander!
Im on right now! Bet youll redacted out like saying youre at work or some redacted!

and ive already caught their attention. I got redacted for calling a mod redacacted redacted who do you redacted think you are are you so redacted redacted you just sit there redacted yourself? Or roughly the equivalent when they tried to redacted my name. 7 days redacted on the forums. I totally redacted deserved it.

Sorry for the ot but i thought it was pretty redacted funny...

Hey, just givin you a heads up; they warned me and threatened to ban me for exactly that so I stopped. Thought you might not know better Stone Prophet
#91
Posted 23 April 2015 - 06:16 PM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 23 April 2015 - 02:46 PM, said:
Hey, just givin you a heads up; they warned me and threatened to ban me for exactly that so I stopped. Thought you might not know better Stone Prophet
That would be excellent advice, if i were indeed an alt for posting on the forums, but no, i am a true blue 100 percent authentic Clammer! Are you thinking, perhaps, of my freebirth brother? It happens. Hes all about the money filthy Lucrewarrior Merc. Hes one of those cowardly Davions so we never fight one another. But hes always hogging my bandwidth

Edited by Stoned Prophet, 23 April 2015 - 06:17 PM.
#92
Posted 23 April 2015 - 08:01 PM
Joseph Mallan, on 23 April 2015 - 09:13 AM, said:
WTF does any of that have to do with the vast majority of the player base not playing CW because it was designed badly?
#95
Posted 24 April 2015 - 11:27 AM
Drop into the match and a team mate, lets call him "rat" say's "Oh no we are fighting the mighty and awsome "Gankers united" we are doomed."
Some one on my team says "Another cheerleader for the opposite team, do they make you wear a skirt?"
Rat replies "You suck this is a PUG team and doesnt stand a chance, join a unit and be assimilated or be wiped out every match."
Some one replies "redacted redacted redacted redacted."
Rats co-synch dropper replies "Just quit if you dont like it"
Someone replies "If they are so good why dont they use Inner Sphere mechs and not use synch droppers?"
Rat and co-synch dropper reply "What are you talking about your crazy."
End of match screen shows that only 8 team mates did over 100 damage to the other team.
Even without the colorfull banter, the end of match screen will usually show how many legit players were on each team. 4 mechs is enough to rule out an unlucky drop which happens to everyone resulting in a super low score.
Edited by Johnny Z, 24 April 2015 - 11:41 AM.
#96
Posted 24 April 2015 - 11:29 AM
kamiko kross, on 24 April 2015 - 10:58 AM, said:
It was designed for the wrong market.
No, the wrong market wants to play CW. Theres PLENTY of people in the right market that want to play cw. Its just gonna take time before its fully fleshed out. Meanwhile, solo pugs cry because they want to have the team part of the game made easier, AFTER they GOT their solo queue.
#97
Posted 29 June 2015 - 07:49 PM
destroika, on 21 April 2015 - 06:07 PM, said:
At the same time, I'm being told it's being used as intended. Good communication and coordination along with decent skill as a plus.
So there you have it. In short, CW is working perfectly, so avoid it.
-----
It just seems like something is wrong with this. Story of MWO. Until I get my free MC from ranks, I won't stop completely pugging in CW, but I will be going less and less, meanwhile, getting more and more burned out. This is good, maybe I will have such a severe distaste and hatred for this game I can finally put it away for good.
First I hear Ya. Take a week off it helps. I also switched to just playing Skirmish mode most of the time.
As to CW. Lets SEE-----Hummmmm. Wait time, Check. Drop-ship Camping, Check. Unable to use any mech with out changing Allegiance, Check. Yup, done here.
#98
Posted 30 June 2015 - 08:20 AM
Stoned Prophet, on 24 April 2015 - 11:29 AM, said:
Agreed, but those guys you mention are very loud indeed, VERY entitled and insanely, doggedly..obsessively persistent. Plus, their ego centric viewpoint CANNOT be changed with logic.
The only issue with CW now is it requires teamwork, which is exactly what people are refusing to do.
#99
Posted 30 June 2015 - 10:43 AM
Kilo 40, on 23 April 2015 - 06:47 AM, said:
The design of CW, in that it caters to large groups at the expense of small groups and solo players was a very poor decision. Stop blaming players for poor design choices.
If those "Players" even knew what a "design decision" actually entailed, I might be more inclined to agree with that statement, but the Forums constant supply of BS "best for MWO content" continues to prove that assumption moot and totally incorrect.
But feel free to carry on "deciding" what you think is best for MWO from your development armchair.
Edited by Almond Brown, 30 June 2015 - 10:45 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users