Sarna.net said:
What's up with that?
Can someone explain to me the actual ******* logic behind putting CASE on a mech that uses only one ******* ton of ammo? With a STD engine??? I don't understand.
Now it's a given, I'm analyzing the above thing thru an MWO-centric perspective, which isn't really fair to BT/MW in general as a whole, but... seriously, can someone justify that example or some of the other head scratchers?
It seems to me that there's lots of examples of mechs and armor that has stuff like that in BT/MW. So while this isn't exactly a MWO thing per se, you can sort of see examples of it in game, particularly stock builds etc.
Seems odd that some random mongo nerds on the internet in in 2015 [and surely earlier] can see obvious inefficient or dumb **** on some of these mechs n stuff... so whats up with a thousand years later, these super genius engineers and scientists make questionable decisions from the start? That Targe is a great example. I know that logistics and financial and technological things come into play yada yada yada, but still. Whats the point of that ******* CASE. What's the point of any CASE, ever. **** it. Ride the snake.
K, got that off my chest, gg.
ps - no really, think about it... 24 shots... if you can't get those off before the ammo goes, while you get ***** on in a MASC-capable mech that hauls ass, something is wrong... ****** CASE, I will never understand. NEVER!
Edited by Soy, 06 May 2015 - 09:42 AM.