471 replies to this topic

[ShinVector]

Ovion, on 15 May 2015 - 03:09 AM, said:

It's not even the worst locust.
I would take the 1V over the 3S.

Apparently you haven't realise that thanks to the Quirkening...
The 3S is now a viable Luugin !

And yes... I dueled terribad Founder Jenner and killed it 1v1.

Edited by ShinVector, 15 May 2015 - 04:12 AM.

[Gnume]

Question ... this one seems to be worded a bit differently than the Founders one or perhaps I just missed it ...

For the Kill Counter...getting a Kill while piloting a Phoenix Mech ... does it matter what queue you drop in for that portion or just as long as you get the kill (whether Solo, Group, or CW) does it count?

[BSK]

Ovion, on 15 May 2015 - 03:09 AM, said:

AND you've posted it multiple times.

After I posted in the official announcement then I am not allowed to use the subforum dedicated to my mother tongue?

[Twilight Fenrir]

CaptRosha, on 15 May 2015 - 04:31 AM, said:

Question ... this one seems to be worded a bit differently than the Founders one or perhaps I just missed it ...

For the Kill Counter...getting a Kill while piloting a Phoenix Mech ... does it matter what queue you drop in for that portion or just as long as you get the kill (whether Solo, Group, or CW) does it count?

Read the whole thing

Yes, it matters. Solo only, and not CW.

Edited by Twilight Fenrir, 15 May 2015 - 05:00 AM.

[Ovion]

BSK, on 15 May 2015 - 04:50 AM, said:

After I posted in the official announcement then I am not allowed to use the subforum dedicated to my mother tongue?

In this thread alone I saw it at least twice.

Regardless, it's the most pathetic extreme of a petty ideal.

"It shouldn't go on sale ever again to let people who missed it get access, except for us, so we can get access to what we missed"
Do you not realise just how obnoxious that sounds?

Edited by Ovion, 15 May 2015 - 05:09 AM.

[KuroNyra]

Ovion, on 15 May 2015 - 05:06 AM, said:

In this thread alone I saw it at least twice.

Regardless, it's the most pathetic extreme of a petty ideal.

"It shouldn't go on sale ever again to let people who missed it get access, except for us, so we can get access to what we missed"
Do you not realise just how obnoxious that sounds?

Generally, people who are asking that don't even know what obnoxious mean.


What does it mean by the way?

[Ovion]

KuroNyra, on 15 May 2015 - 05:18 AM, said:

Generally, people who are asking that don't even know what obnoxious mean.


What does it mean by the way?

obnoxious
[uh b-nok-shuh s]
adjective
1. highly objectionable or offensive; odious: obnoxious behavior.
2. annoying or objectionable due to being a showoff or attracting undue attention to oneself: an obnoxious little brat.
3. Archaic. exposed or liable to harm, evil, or anything objectionable.
4. Obsolete. liable to punishment or censure; reprehensible.

Edited by Ovion, 15 May 2015 - 05:22 AM.

[Nothing Whatsoever]

I have no problem seeing the packages for sale again.

And if the devs are open to differentiate when the packages were bought, maybe have tweaks to the Badges and Titles for the Packages when made available again.

---

I think a better question would have been, should ammo damage per ton be increased for at least MGs and SRMs (MG's go from its paltry 160 damage per ton to at least 400 damage per ton, as it was originally in the P&P game, and SRMs go to 240 damage, 120 missiles per ton)?

Such a change would help out ammo dependent lights, such as the little Locusts in particular.

[POWR]

Bring it back, fine with me (yes, Overlord owner here). If you want any kind of limiting on stuff thats on sale I say just put it on whatever you add to it. Keep selling stuff and make money.

[Tom Sawyer]

No problem at all with bringing it back. If it helps keep this game funded and new maps, mechs, and game modes coming that is a win win.

For the original owners give us a REALLY cool phoenix medallion. Something like a fiery phoenix to show we where the original purchasers

For the phoenix rising a new medallion perhaps. Maybe an egg hatching with a flame coming out of it.


As I sadly was not a founder to financial issues at that time I can not speak for the founder packs.

Edited by Tom Sawyer, 15 May 2015 - 06:01 AM.

[Melonic]

As founder and overlord I will vote YES.

Thanks to all who (are in the lucky position to) spend money on this game which many of us were waiting for so long and enjoy so much.

[reign]

As a Overlord I would vote yes.

Of course I would like to get my hands on the reinforcements now that I have a little extra cash So I am being self serving.

[Malleus011]

Of course PGI can re-sell Project Pheonix.

IF

They change the camo pattern of the bonus variants
They change the tag to be something other than (P)

Then I'm fine. You've left me my 'unique and limited' Phoenix Mechs, but everybody else can get the 'second wave' of Phoenix, if they wish.

[GRiPSViGiL]

The more things you put up to be bought the more chance you hope someone will buy right PGI? Get CW fixed for goodness sake.

Phoenix shouldn't be allowed again nor should founders.

[KodiakGW]

Personally, I've going to vote Yes for the Phoenix to be available again. IF (big if) we get the points. Remember, to count, we can only use the Phoenix variant. The GUARDIAN package would be a nice gift for someone starting or returning to the game who wants to play in CW after leveling them. Two Shadowhawks, two Thunderbolts can be a decent drop deck. Not the meta by a long shot, but enough for a decent pilot to assist an IS team.

Maybe to appease those who purchased because it was a limited time offer, only offer it in the Gift Store for those who currently own it. You know, the ones participating in the event and taking the (blech) Phoenix variant.

[Kamies]

Thank you so much that finally there is a Battlemaster leaderboard where not-LRM-boat-Battlemaster can win! Too bad I don't have enough time to grind as much as I would like but I shall try.

Edited by Kamies, 15 May 2015 - 07:39 AM.

[BSK]

Ovion, on 15 May 2015 - 05:06 AM, said:

"It shouldn't go on sale ever again to let people who missed it get access, except for us, so we can get access to what we missed"
Do you not realise just how obnoxious that sounds?

We invested venture capital in a broken game. We deserve a better interest rate than consumers. And dont use quotation marks for interpretative quotes, use italics.

Again, there are enough packages available for new consumers, but those who were limited must stay limited. Which would be next? The Grid Iron Limited Edition?

[IraqiWalker]

BSK, on 15 May 2015 - 07:46 AM, said:

We invested venture capital in a broken game. We deserve a better interest rate than consumers. And dont use quotation marks for interpretative quotes, use italics.

Again, there are enough packages available for new consumers, but those who were limited must stay limited. Which would be next? The Grid Iron Limited Edition?

The only thing "limited" about the GI was the cockpit item.

[BSK]

IraqiWalker, on 15 May 2015 - 07:49 AM, said:

The only thing "limited" about the GI was the cockpit item.

Ok, then make it available in the shop. Including the name on the monitor.

[Lyoto Machida]

Rushin Roulette, on 14 May 2015 - 11:56 PM, said:

Wow... Its great to see the usual self entitled and selfish users out in force again.

PGI wrote, that the (p) mechs would never be sold again... PGI LIED TO US ITS THE END OF THE BLOODY WORLD!!!!11ONEELEVENZEZ!!!

So what? Are you going to whine and vote no just because you personally are enraged at a decision of PGI? Or will you be voting no because you dont want others to buy into your super special secret society circle?

I for my part will vote yes just to give others the chance of buying the Phoenix mechs IF THEY WANT TO. Let the people who actually want to spend money on the already released mechs decide if tehy want to buy them or not. It doesnt mean that people HAVE to buy them.

Stop being self entitled and selfish brats!

This makes me want to vote no even more now.