Jump to content

So When Are They Going To Fix Trebuchets?


21 replies to this topic

#21 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 30 May 2015 - 06:35 AM

To the OP, the answer is never.

They have stated that they won't bother going back to fix existing mechs (outside of making the last 5 mechs - Commando, Dragon, Stalker, Awesome, Cicada - to get the "legomech" system).

It's sad but true.

#22 Templar Dane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,057 posts

Posted 30 May 2015 - 06:57 AM

View PostLordBraxton, on 30 May 2015 - 05:05 AM, said:

PGI doesnt fix mistakes, they make more mistakes so you ignore the old ones.


EDIT: Height is never an advantage by itself. Being tall greatly reduces the amount of viable cover on any given map. High mounted hard points are an advantage.

A treb with height and low slung hardpoints gets the worst of both worlds.


The odds of them making any money by fixing the treb is pretty low. The only chance we've got at getting the model scaled properly is if it's included in some batch of things that need to get fixed.

The likelihood of that happening is pretty slim. Dev time spent fixing the treb could be used on the next mech pack or hero mech, something that actually makes them money.....and when those two compete I'm pretty sure they'd going to pick money every time.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users