Jump to content

Assault 'mechs Re-Scale Vote (Part 1)


103 replies to this topic

Poll: Assault 'Mechs Re-Scale Vote (3773 member(s) have cast votes)

Which Assault 'Mech do you want to have re-scaled the most?

  1. Voted Awesome - 80 Tonnage (2291 votes [35.84%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 35.84%

  2. Voted Victor - 80 Tonnage (612 votes [9.57%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 9.57%

  3. Voted Zeus - 80 Tonnage (347 votes [5.43%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.43%

  4. Gargoyle - 80 Tonnage (469 votes [7.34%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.34%

  5. Voted Stalker - 85 Tonnage (514 votes [8.04%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.04%

  6. BattleMaster - 85 Tonnage (335 votes [5.24%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.24%

  7. Warhawk - 85 Tonnage (454 votes [7.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 7.10%

  8. Highlander - 90 Tonnage (226 votes [3.54%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 3.54%

  9. Voted Banshee - 95 Tonnage (145 votes [2.27%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.27%

  10. Executioner - 95 Tonnage (179 votes [2.80%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.80%

  11. Voted Atlas - 100 Tonnage (444 votes [6.95%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 6.95%

  12. King Crab - 100 Tonnage (189 votes [2.96%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.96%

  13. Dire Wolf - 100 Tonnage (187 votes [2.93%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 2.93%

Vote

#101 Lucaze Terrain

    Rookie

  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 7 posts

Posted 07 July 2015 - 06:52 PM

View PostBeo Vulf, on 07 July 2015 - 04:36 PM, said:

I voted for the Dire Wolf but really all the 100 tonners need scaling up.


Absolutely agree with you, mate. The assaults need to be fearsome and incredibly intimidating to face in the battlefield. They need to look the part in terms of size.

#102 HlynkaCG

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 1,263 posts
  • LocationSitting on a 12x multiplier and voting for Terra Therma

Posted 07 July 2015 - 08:51 PM

The Awsome is the only assault that stands out to me as needing serious work, but like the Centurion, I think that the Victor could use some "slimming down".

Posted Image

Edited by HlynkaCG, 07 July 2015 - 08:52 PM.


#103 Livaria

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • 405 posts

Posted 08 July 2015 - 07:59 AM

I must be one of the few people that is not voting awesome. If you are curious as to why, then it is because that even with the Awesomes wide profile, it still is the smallest assault in the entire game.

If you are concerned about mech size in relation to each other, the scale of the awesome actually makes a lot of sense. It is about the right size for an 80 ton mech. Whereas other 80 ton mechs such as the Victor or Gargoyle are competing with something like the 100 ton atlas. If our goal is to make mechs scaled based on tonnage, then I believe that there are other mechs that could need more attention than the Awesome.

If the Awesome becomes thinner, then the Orion is very close to becoming a larger mech than the Awesome. From an overall visual standpoint, I can understand if you dont appreciate the Awesomes wide profile. But I seriously want people to at least consider what I have to say. I would much rather have the Victor or Gargoyle to be rescaled than the Awesome. Maybe even the Battlemaster.

If I cant win however, then I will suggest that the center torso and legs get reduced slightly. Otherwise, it may start to look like its 75 tons.

Edited by Livaria, 08 July 2015 - 08:18 AM.


#104 Zankou Ryles

    Member

  • PipPip
  • The Defiant
  • The Defiant
  • 20 posts
  • LocationSt. Louis,MO

Posted 09 July 2015 - 08:49 AM

The awesome needs to be like the MechWarrior 4 look, that would get ppls attention and still be usable, and keep the quirks, as a clanner i would be just fine with that.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users