Two Simple Questions
#1
Posted 02 September 2015 - 12:07 PM
Q2 on the HPG the gravity is 0.9 but it has no atmosphere? With that sort of gravity surely it would have an atmosphere of some sort? (cool effect though)
#2
Posted 02 September 2015 - 12:09 PM
Generally best not to think too hard about it.
#3
Posted 02 September 2015 - 12:19 PM
Greyhart, on 02 September 2015 - 12:07 PM, said:
Q2 on the HPG the gravity is 0.9 but it has no atmosphere? With that sort of gravity surely it would have an atmosphere of some sort? (cool effect though)
1) Because heat is REALLY difficult to propagate through an atmosphere. If you shrunk the sun down to the size of a basketball, you would be safe standing like... 2m away from it. It'd be hot and uncomfortable, but you'd also be 2m away from a ball of fusion energy. At the same time, the Mechs we're piloting have tightly controlled coolant systems. The Mech isn't going to be bleeding off heat like some barely contained sun, because almost all of that heat is being pumped through coolant tubes and in to the radiator vanes of your heat sinks.
2) A number of reasons. Mars, for instance, has similar gravity but almost no atmosphere to speak of.
#4
Posted 02 September 2015 - 12:24 PM
#5
Posted 02 September 2015 - 12:28 PM
You will just get upset if you keep going.
BAIL NOW and enjoy it for what it is.
The size your lens/Mirrors would have to be on your lasers to hit targets at 1000 or more meters is ridiculous. To put it into perspective my 2" lens on my co2 lasers only have a focal point of 6.875 inches. Anything closer or further away really doesn't get touched by the heat...maybe cheap plastic but thats it.
Edited by DarthRevis, 02 September 2015 - 12:30 PM.
#6
Posted 02 September 2015 - 12:34 PM
Greyhart, on 02 September 2015 - 12:07 PM, said:
The heat sensors doesn't "look" at your own mech. Heat is IR, it radiates out from your mech, it will not bend and return into the sensor.
Greyhart, on 02 September 2015 - 12:07 PM, said:
Gravity and atmosphere have no such relationship.
#7
Posted 02 September 2015 - 12:39 PM
Why does my computer weigh X tons?
Possible Answer: Vacuum Tubes, lots and lots of Vacuum tubes
Why in 3050 why are missles that travel at best 1100 meters called "long range" missles?
Possible Answer: Well, they are really just darts, big darts and that's a long way to throw a dart
I had someone tell me in an earlier post somewhere that if you are going to criticize then you should always bring along a solution/answer, so just be sure to do that!
#8
Posted 02 September 2015 - 12:43 PM
But i want it to say..."Because i said so!" lolz!
I enjoy signature humor.
#9
Posted 02 September 2015 - 12:53 PM
there are some good answers at least
#10
Posted 02 September 2015 - 01:40 PM
Mcgral18, on 02 September 2015 - 12:09 PM, said:
Generally best not to think too hard about it.
ESPECIALLY where battletech is concerned, where engineers cannot create any piece of equipment that weights less than one tonne, aside from an enterprising few true savants that have stunned the Inner Sphere by creating half tonne ammunition.
I like to imagine there's a crusty old engineer somewhere so set in his ways that he doesn't equip any of that newfangled half tonne crap.
#11
Posted 02 September 2015 - 01:52 PM
Kiiyor, on 02 September 2015 - 01:40 PM, said:
ESPECIALLY where battletech is concerned, where engineers cannot create any piece of equipment that weights less than one tonne, aside from an enterprising few true savants that have stunned the Inner Sphere by creating half tonne ammunition.
I like to imagine there's a crusty old engineer somewhere so set in his ways that he doesn't equip any of that newfangled half tonne crap.
My favorite is that a glorified 40mm Bofors weighs 6000kg. A Rheinmetall 120mm L/44 barely weighs 4500kg.
That doesn't make sense even with spacefuture logic... ESPECIALLY with spacefuture logic!
#12
Posted 02 September 2015 - 02:01 PM
#13
Posted 02 September 2015 - 09:21 PM
#14
Posted 02 September 2015 - 09:29 PM
#15
Posted 02 September 2015 - 10:27 PM
#17
Posted 02 September 2015 - 11:22 PM
#18
Posted 03 September 2015 - 12:44 AM
Alistair Winter, on 02 September 2015 - 12:24 PM, said:
This just made me wonder...
Idea: RND shot spread when shooting untargeted (increasing RND with increasing speed, temp). After targeting, must wait for full lock to achieve convergence and tracking with no RND spread, and then only on the locked mech.
Not sure if it would work in MWO, but it's closer to what they describe in the books and TT with targeting comps.
#19
Posted 03 September 2015 - 12:57 AM
Yellonet, on 02 September 2015 - 12:34 PM, said:
Gravity and atmosphere have no such relationship.
Yeah, that's not true.
Answers for the OP's Q's:
1: this games version of heat vision is terabad. White snow on IR? Really?!
2: The earth is at 1.0 gravity and it's losing atmosphere at a pretty constant rate. HPG could have had it at some point and lost it all, or might not have ever had the proper elements to form one.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users