

Dear Noobs, How Not To Suck In Cw
#81
Posted 22 September 2015 - 03:05 AM
#82
Posted 22 September 2015 - 04:43 AM
Until that happens I will continue to rant against the meta and give PGI ideas and solutions on how to nerf your holier-than-thou @sses.
#83
Posted 22 September 2015 - 04:45 AM
#84
Posted 22 September 2015 - 04:50 AM
Mellifluer, on 20 September 2015 - 02:59 PM, said:
no tactics except do A B and C
no mech choice except A B and C
do as i say or your a complete and utter waste of humanity
no fun
no thinking
just meta and deathblobbing
your post is bad and you should feel bad.
One thing the OP NEVER mentions is that to do well in CW, JOIN A GROUP. Joining a group/unit should be first advice given when wanting to play in CW.
Dropping solo into a group/unit focus part of the game you are already a hindrance.
#85
Posted 22 September 2015 - 04:53 AM
RussianWolf, on 20 September 2015 - 03:36 PM, said:
Great way to build a community by actively seeking them out to intentionally grief them.
You are an asset to MWO and humanity in general.
#86
Posted 22 September 2015 - 05:00 AM
oldradagast, on 20 September 2015 - 05:10 PM, said:
If large teams rofl-stomping random PUG's wasn't a key part of CW, I'd be more inclined to believe them. Any game mode that hands out wins for higher-level players by pitting them against far less coordinated and skilled opponents is not "hard mode" - it's "epeen mode" or "tryhard mode."
If key part being that 12man units are 1% or less of the CW population, then yes.
Maybe it is finally time for a stop gap to prevent these far less coordinated and skilled players from entering the coordinated and skilled area of the game?
For there own protection of course since they cannot make these decisions for themselves.
#87
Posted 22 September 2015 - 05:05 AM
MischiefSC, on 20 September 2015 - 09:48 PM, said:
Or find just doing better than before instead of just recycling whatever you've always done, fun.
Kind of like the people that complain about NASCAR on these forums and yet cannot come up with a tactic that isn't?
Funny to see those very same people complain and then be the ones to use it in game and have the team use it.
#89
Posted 22 September 2015 - 05:27 AM
oldradagast, on 20 September 2015 - 05:08 PM, said:
It is funny. Some people get sucked up into games and they become obsessions. Others have a pathological need to prove their superiority at everything from video games to tabletop RPG's, to blowing their nose. Everything is a contest, and they have to be "the best" at everything. I've found such people intolerable to be around for any length of time because they are miserable creatures who will turn everything into epeen competition. And there's no shortage of that in CW.
Some people are just competitive by nature. Its not required to be a **** about it, but for example i really, really dont like losing, and given that my father and sister both have Olympic medals, i think that there is a fairly wide competitive streak running through my family.
Nothing wrong with wanting to win at everything you do, as long as you take responsibility for it when you lose, and dont blame others/circumstances.
#90
Posted 22 September 2015 - 05:30 AM
cdlord, on 22 September 2015 - 04:43 AM, said:
Until that happens I will continue to rant against the meta and give PGI ideas and solutions on how to nerf your holier-than-thou @sses.
Well said 100 % agree
#91
Posted 22 September 2015 - 05:57 AM
#92
Posted 22 September 2015 - 06:05 AM
Edweird, on 22 September 2015 - 05:57 AM, said:
Whaaa? thats incredibly underweight. Id advise swapping the X-5 for something heavier (70+ tons)
#93
Posted 22 September 2015 - 06:13 AM
Black Ivan, on 22 September 2015 - 05:30 AM, said:
Much farm would be had since there is no MM in CW. It's first come first served for spots.
A bunch of units/players sit in TS. looks at queue. Everyone in the TS presses launch at same time on same planet. Everyone gets into same match. ggclose
Edited by Catalina Steiner, 23 September 2015 - 08:20 AM.
#94
Posted 22 September 2015 - 08:12 AM
Spheroid, on 20 September 2015 - 03:05 PM, said:
Maybe if you re-worded this part of the OP, it is very Douche' ish, some just might. Until then, it was very much just a "Douche'" based post.
Quote
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users