

Cicada Vs Wolverine
#1
Posted 20 September 2015 - 03:41 PM
The CICADA is fast, 1 version with ECM, the others are focus on laser, which I think is a fast hiter. the problem is, I already owned and mastered my Raven, and their style are almost the same.
WOLVERINE provide different play style with each version (LL, AC5, SRM), but is only useful because of quirk, which will be changed soon.
Can anyone give me advise for which one I shoud pick? Also, how is the incoming free mech? The CICADA looks like a airbond mech.....and the WOLVERINE carry a afterbruner....
#2
Posted 20 September 2015 - 04:14 PM
Wolverine, due to quirks, is ether a dual Ac5 or a 3LL + 1medl build mech, highly specialized and right arm heavy, much like the centurion , it has great damage potential due to quirks, but it's hitboxes make it somewhat easy to kill and if the right arm goes so does the damage from there on, so it's a glass cannon.
Hope that helps.
Edited by Nik Reaper, 20 September 2015 - 04:16 PM.
#3
Posted 20 September 2015 - 04:39 PM
#4
Posted 20 September 2015 - 04:58 PM
Riam, on 20 September 2015 - 04:39 PM, said:
When will this requirkening happen?
#5
Posted 20 September 2015 - 05:14 PM
the 3M makes a great ac5 or UAV5 mech, so good damage at long range, and then blast with 4 ML's when close before you flee. Over all, great mechs. I even use the 3M in my drop deck and is one of my highest KDR mechs. Grab the 3M and 2B, you won't be sorry.
Wolverines were good even before they were quirked. they just weren't the top meta mechs. But i always played well in them. (all but the 6K, pre-quirk that mech was not too hot). They have good hitboxes, and incredible torso twist, so much in fact you can basically flee from the enemy and still laydown fire behind you which is really nice. Enemies tend not to aim as well when they are being shot at, and not many mechs can evade and return fire, the wolvie is one of them. It also has the shield arm like the centurions, so that's nice, especially if you run XL's in um
The limited hard points on them is also an advantage in some ways, as you can really pack in a much larger engine, and a bunch of Jumpjets, Its the fastest medium, outside of the cicada, and can pack in 7 JJ's.
the 7K plays a lot like a faster HBK 4SP with JJ's and is my favorite. A pair of SRM6's, 2 MPL's, Bap+JJ's and a big honking engine makes it a very fun ride.
the 6K is the energy boat, It runs hot, but all it's eggs are in one basket, aka right arm, so you need to protect it.
the 6R is your balistic/missile mech, and toss in a tag in the head for good luck! Sorta like the Centurion AH, but you aren't running an AC-20, instead it's a longer range ballistic set up.
They make great light hunters, or lance escort as well as awesome flankers.. If you play um like a Heavily armored light. Personally i'd grab the 7K and 6R. Mainly because i don't like all my weapons in just a single arm and with re-balance, who knows what will happen to the quirks on it.. to me this mech is on the list of the over quirked, so that will most likely get some changes. But that is just a guess.
You can also run good sized standards in them, for a bit more of a tanky medium. But wolvies weapons are in the right arm, and left torso.. Loose your arm first, you are down to your torso anyway, so when that pops you are outta weapons anyway, so it makes XL's a good choice.
All that said.. You are getting both, save your credits, play um both till ya got full basics and an extra 8500 for tweak, then decide what to buy..

#6
Posted 20 September 2015 - 10:10 PM
The ultimate aim of the rebalance is to make it so all Mechs are equally viable
#7
Posted 20 September 2015 - 11:33 PM
Wolverine are mostly playable right of out the box with stock stock engine, and you can start saving up for DHS upgrade.
Meanwhile Cicada will require investment of several million cbills in XL engine on the get go to be useful.
#8
Posted 21 September 2015 - 12:41 AM
xengk, on 20 September 2015 - 11:33 PM, said:
Meanwhile Cicada will require investment of several million cbills in XL engine on the get go to be useful.
Don't forget he's getting those 2 Loyalty mechs to begin with. That Cicada already comes with a nice XL that may be shared with the rest.
#9
Posted 21 September 2015 - 12:45 AM
it moves pretty fast for what it is, the armor means you won't get one shot. and the 27 damage is decent.
the only problem you will have is running into a hugin, the srms will kill you in no time. stay away from hugin, oxide and big alpha laserboat mechs like arctic cheetah, firestarter, locust and mist lynx
#10
Posted 21 September 2015 - 12:45 AM
xengk, on 20 September 2015 - 11:33 PM, said:
Wolverine are mostly playable right of out the box with stock stock engine, and you can start saving up for DHS upgrade.
Meanwhile Cicada will require investment of several million cbills in XL engine on the get go to be useful.
The Cicada 3M comes with the XL he'll use with most of them, anyways. So out of the box, if he starts with the XL Cicada, he's almost set.
#11
Posted 21 September 2015 - 01:59 AM
For Cicada, I understand XL engine is a must, so I will start with 3M, but I have no idea which version should be my 3rd.
The catch for Cicada is that I have got the Raven mastery pack, already mastered the 3L and almost master the Huggin (yes, it kill a lot of Cicada). Also, it is only 5 tons different with Raven - which may matter in CW deck.
Wolverine provide much different play style, but I hear that it is bad without quirks, which will change shortly...
(Please forgive my grammar, I know I am bad about it)
#12
Posted 21 September 2015 - 02:12 AM
#13
Posted 21 September 2015 - 02:35 AM
Breender, on 21 September 2015 - 02:12 AM, said:
Well I think the laser Cicadas are much more of a hit and run version than the Huginn. Some of the Cicadas have PPC quirks as well, which actually make them more effective and long range poking than the 3L in my opinion.
They really do play much more like a heavy Light mech, rather than a Medium. They used to be terrifying for other light pilots before the FS9 and ACH came out. I'll be working on my loyalty Cicada first to see if I like the platform, but I've heard good things about it, and I have Ravens as well so I'll let you know how they compare if I can remember this thread exists in a few weeks.
#14
Posted 21 September 2015 - 02:36 AM
the 3M with its ECM is the most popular, but even that one variant has a variety of possibilities, some run it like a Shadow Cat with a Gauss rifle and ECM, others play it like a Jenner, high speed, short range, still others configure it with a slow engine and long range lasers or PPCs, using it to support the heavies and assaults, the Raven style lone ECM sniper is also possible.
there is a CDA varient (the 3C) with just 1 energy slot and 4 ballistics, usualy played as an ERPPC or LPL backed by machine guns.
the A and B have similar hardpoints, with the A having 4 energy in the side torsos 2 in CT, and the B having 4 in the arms and 2 CT, those are best suited for lasers, ether MPL, ML or SPL and the largest engine you can afford, literally use them like a Jenner JR7-F without Jumpjets.
then there is the X5, it has 4 torso mounted lasers and 2 missile tubes, again this can be outfitted with the 4 ML 2 SRM4 build I use on the JR7-D
#15
Posted 21 September 2015 - 05:10 AM
IraqiWalker, on 21 September 2015 - 12:45 AM, said:
The XL320? Nah, the sweet spot engine for the CDA is the XL300. At 133.7, you're faster than everything other than lights already (and leet to boot

@OP: Man, are those two different mechs. If you're getting the loyalty variants, if you go Cicada I'd add the CDA-3M and CDA-2B. The first has ECM and can run a variety of energy based builds or build it around one UAC (though I hate single UACs personally) the second runs best with 5MPL, but due to solid generic energy quirks can run other energy well, too. The 3M is usually a poker, the 2B a striker.
If you go WVR, do not miss the 6K, 3-4 LL in the arms is a monster. Of the other two, the 6R does best with dual AC/5 dakka and the 7K is a solid SRM brawler, that's pretty much a preference choice, IMO.
Neither chassis's hero is particularly special. The X-5 is ok, but I wouldn't spend money on it until you've fallen in love with the chassis (the Cicada is my "home" chassis, I have mastered them all and then some, so I can only assume this will happen.

Edited by Terciel1976, 21 September 2015 - 05:27 AM.
#16
Posted 21 September 2015 - 05:20 AM
Rogue Jedi, on 21 September 2015 - 02:36 AM, said:
The 2B only has 5 hardpoints actually, it gets them in the arms as a tradeoff for losing one vs. the 2A. With current energy quirks, that's more than worth it, the 2A is clearly inferior to the 2B.
Edited by Terciel1976, 21 September 2015 - 05:25 AM.
#17
Posted 21 September 2015 - 05:32 AM
So I would go Wolverine.
#18
Posted 21 September 2015 - 05:38 AM
Fenrisulvyn, on 21 September 2015 - 05:32 AM, said:
So I would go Wolverine.
You gotta get over that ECM obsession, Fenris. It's holding you back. In the current state of the game. you're comparing the weakest RVN (comp only sees the 2X and 4X) to a mid-pack CDA.
#19
Posted 21 September 2015 - 05:50 AM
I'm currently branching into Stalkers and Jaegers. Although I will always love my 6 Raven 3Ls

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users