80 replies to this topic

[Ryllen Kriel]

The Lyran Commonwealth vs. Chuck Norris.

[VorpalAnvil]

Ryllen Kriel, on 17 October 2015 - 02:31 AM, said:

The Lyran Commonwealth vs. Chuck Norris.

Lol. Davions already get their collective ass handed to them on a daily basis by everyone else. Why would you subject them to that kind of humiliation?

Uh, Kurita vs Bon Jovi

[ShinobiHunter]

Ryllen Kriel, on 17 October 2015 - 02:31 AM, said:

The Lyran Commonwealth vs. Chuck Norris.

If you want to fight Chuck Norris, you've spent too much time cooped up in your scout Atlas...

[Chados]

No doubt, Paul.

I'd like to see the FWLM and DCMS vs. the AFFC.

Or DCMS or FWLM vs. LCAF or AFFS, with the ability for other faction players to choose sides and help. I'm FWL by unit...but Kurita at heart and I'll Honor the Dragon against anyone who isn't wearing a purple chicken!

And do you notice that a tremendous number of posts are asking for IS v. IS?

[RussianWolf]

My unit has a grudge with those guys with the cow skull faction.

[Domoneky]

[GateheaD]

A bunch of people have been banned in which the mail referenced this thread, which many of them haven't posted in.
Very Interesting.

Maybe the Grudge is PGI vs Its Customers

[jaxjace]

FRR VS GHOST BEAR!

[Kin3ticX]

I would like to see low tonnage eventually tied in to an event (like ~200t). Shaking up the dropdecks for a few days can be nice for those bored of 65/65/65/45 and other marginally similar cfgs.

As for long lasting grudges i'd probably have to nominate Wolf-FRR

[The Droid]

PGI Conducting Community Outreach

[White Bear 84]

Davion vs Liao.

Suggestion: Poll feature in game that activates on a 48hr cycle - allow faction aligned players to vote who they wish to attack. Bonuses get attributed on the closest match up e.g. if majority of stiener want to attack marik and majority of marik want to attack stiener, rewards go to this clash.

Offer multiple challenges so it is not just restricted to say, marik fighting stiener for one night.. ..encourage factions to fight their own fights...

[Karl Marlow]

I'd like to see the classic match up with st ives vs diamond shark

[Rushin Roulette]

White Bear 84, on 21 October 2015 - 12:08 AM, said:

Davion vs Liao.

Id definitely suport this. Personally Id want to atack the planet "Truth" and get the 331 tag on the planet with the System ID 331;

[Karl Marlow]

If we go back to CW beta 1 Marik had a big grudge with fedcom. Davion vs Marik fighting over Wazan was a big deal. Later in phase 1 we fought both Steiner and davion. Near the end we had that weirdness with kurita.

Personally I want to fight Steiner but grudgewise it's fedcom as a whole. More wise it's dead on in this timeframe which turns to just against davion in 57. In the bastardization that is phase 2 I don't really know. We haven't really had the politics shaking things up and creating narratives go grudges to feed on.

Kinda sad. That kind of stuff is what made phase 1 interesting and it died with phase 1.

Edited by ThomasMarik, 03 November 2015 - 02:44 AM.

[John Gun]

Steiner vs. Jadefalcons is the usual so:

Steiner vs. Marik could be fun for a change.

Wich doesn't mean i am bored taking back planets from the Falcons.

[Revis Volek]

Sixpack, on 09 October 2015 - 03:05 PM, said:

Smoke Jaguar against Kurita

Kajikazawa needs to fall.

[William Slayer]

White Bear 84, on 21 October 2015 - 12:08 AM, said:

Suggestion: Poll feature in game that activates on a 48hr cycle - allow faction aligned players to vote who they wish to attack. Bonuses get attributed on the closest match up e.g. if majority of stiener want to attack marik and majority of marik want to attack stiener, rewards go to this clash.

Offer multiple challenges so it is not just restricted to say, marik fighting stiener for one night.. ..encourage factions to fight their own fights...

Kin3ticX, on 20 October 2015 - 11:11 PM, said:

I would like to see low tonnage eventually tied in to an event (like ~200t). Shaking up the dropdecks for a few days can be nice for those bored of 65/65/65/45 and other marginally similar cfgs.

BOTH of these suggestions have real merit. We already have implemented a voting system for PUG drops, why not community warfare? Taking a 3 week dedicated block of time (call it the Campaign Weeks) to attack a faction would develop FOCUS amongst the Units of that faction. Then, you could take a week off to allow the next cycle of discussions, debates, deal making (call it Voting Week), with a vote at the end of that week. The amount of side dealing, official get together's amongst House team leaders, and forum discussion amongst the rank and file would be Extremely interesting.

As an addition, only House dedicated (Permanent alliance) groups should be allowed to vote on who to attack.

Just my two C-Bills.

Think about it!

[Clownwarlord]

DEATH TO KURITA AND LIAO!!!!

[xX PUG Xx]

So has this been shelved in anticipation of the Steam release?

(Or is the next release going to appear sooner than we think and include automatically generated "missions", based on the attack paths voted for by the Loyalists?)

[Prussian Havoc]

xX PUG Xx, on 24 November 2015 - 03:26 PM, said:

So has this been shelved in anticipation of the Steam release?

(Or is the next release going to appear sooner than we think and include automatically generated "missions", based on the attack paths voted for by the Loyalists?)

Mission-based objects?

Loyalist-decided Pathing decisions?



I am sorry to say there has been no commitment by PGI for either... ever. (Let alone 01DEC.)

We can only hope for a Saturnalia-miracle.