74 replies to this topic

[Sarlic]

Almond Brown, on 18 November 2015 - 10:37 AM, said:

And given your attitude noted above about how things should be in MOW, what more is there to say really. Your way or *uck PGI and MWO? Really... That is just sad dude. Just sad.

If you want to bash me atleast do it right.

Sarlic, on 18 June 2015 - 03:35 AM, said:

I tried contacting Russ several ways. Perhaps you or anybody else can try again for the red eyes. But i'm not very hopeful. As for chassis related: i did it for the new players.

http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__4506530
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__4506548
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__4507545
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__4508028

Sarlic, on 18 August 2015 - 02:12 AM, said:

Nope. I haven't heard anything.

Frankly PGI didn't asked me for advice either. Not that it matters, but when Russ was far more active on the forums i expressed my concerns already in the past how things would develop for both vets and new players. Also talked about the red eyes and how Russ thought it that he was under the impression that players found the Red eyes a stupid thing.

I don't pretend to be a comp or pro player, but i know the ins and out of the Atlas. And i'm not the only one. There are other players, perhaps you who know who still play the Atlas despite it's obvious shortcommings.

Guess i only can hope for the best as far the rebalance concerns.

In fact i have been talking to Russ via PM since last year untill he stopped replying. And yes i have been gathering and provided plenty of feedback.

Now this is offtopic. Lets move to ontopic.

Edited by Sarlic, 18 November 2015 - 10:50 AM.

[Ghogiel]

Lugh, on 18 November 2015 - 10:44 AM, said:

Can't wait to see the perfect storm of long absent bittervets listing out every mistake ever made by PGI with their 0 ratings piling up, the very moment it appears on Steam.

MWO is going to ge the reviews it deserves.

[Mcgral18]

Fenrisulvyn, on 18 November 2015 - 05:18 AM, said:

Example: I emailed PGI staff questions about Cap Accelerator not working in Conquest. I even included my test data and was civil and constructive. On Nov 8th and, not only have I not gotten a response, my panel shows it hasn't even been read yet.

10 days with no response? Okay fine, I'm sure you are very busy.

10 days and you haven't even checked your messages? Then why even be listed as a PGI staff contact?

It's been over a Month for me. 11th of October I sent a PM to Tina...nearing 30 Business days? She hasn't looked at it.

Under 2 weeks for Paul's PM, but he hasn't looked at it either.

Ghogiel, on 18 November 2015 - 10:52 AM, said:

MWO is going to ge the reviews it deserves.

Hm...7ish, maybe 6 from me.
Shooty Stompy Robots is good and all, but most other things are so...incompetent. A good base, and so much wasted potential.

[Sarlic]

Mcgral18, on 18 November 2015 - 11:01 AM, said:

Hm...7ish, maybe 6 from me.
Shooty Stompy Robots is good and all, but most other things are so...incompetent. A good base, and so much wasted potential.

I appreciate this the most.
Atleast you are being honest then i some of the delusional Founders i see here thinking a magical unicorn will land and turn the tide.

I agree on the base game. Nothing wrong with it. First pillar of the game is spot on. The rest is just terrible.

Some still don't get what a minimum viable product means and why they keep to support a management which makes the trend of minimum effort going on.

[MechWarrior3671771]

"Under 2 weeks for Paul's PM, but he hasn't looked at it either."

Keep an eye on that one for me, if you don't mind.

I sent one to Russ on July 15th and up until today it said "not yet read" (and hey, if he's too busy, fine). But then today it shows up as being read by him on July 17th. Which means either 1) that feature is borked or 2) they have the ability to stealth alter it. I'd be curious to know which, and if my experience was an outlier.

Edited by Fenrisulvyn, 18 November 2015 - 11:08 AM.

[Wildstreak]

Kira Onime, on 17 November 2015 - 10:42 PM, said:

Hard to be constructive when you're limited to ~140 characters so you have to get straight to the point.

Chrome Magnus, on 17 November 2015 - 11:13 PM, said:

"Hard to be constructive when you're limited to ~140 characters" One of the reasons I hate twitter.

THE reason I never use it.

MercilessTRADER, on 18 November 2015 - 05:02 AM, said:

Why not just put the games modes, maps, and MECHS that I own on a carnival wheel and spin it in the game lobby.

Congratulations, you have won the use of a 4PPC (not ERPPC) Awesome on Terra Therma Conquest!

clownwarlord, on 18 November 2015 - 05:31 AM, said:

What next an unfriending thread for facebook?

Idea stealer!

[Sandpit]

Chrome Magnus, on 17 November 2015 - 10:38 PM, said:

He gets lots of negative opinions on twitter. Perhaps someone was less than constructive?

Kira Onime, on 17 November 2015 - 10:42 PM, said:

Hard to be constructive

Read those two quoted statements.

No it's not. If you're constructive and polite you have nothing to worry about.

[Kira Onime]

Sandpit, on 18 November 2015 - 11:51 AM, said:

Read those two quoted statements.

No it's not. If you're constructive and polite you have nothing to worry about.

.

Read my entire sentence. " hard with 140 characters". 140 characters being key words.

[Death Proof]

Not sure how someone can act like a complete a-hole to somebody then wonder why they blocked them.

[BLOOD WOLF]

Spamming someones twitter will do that to ya

[Kin3ticX]

This guy is still able to tweet Russ

https://twitter.com/...326187102588928

https://twitter.com/...330122345390081

Did you do anything like that?

[Sandpit]

Kira Onime, on 18 November 2015 - 12:04 PM, said:

.

Read my entire sentence. " hard with 140 characters". 140 characters being key words.

the character limitation does not prevent someone from being polite and constructive. It's an excuse for being rude.

[Sarlic]

Sandpit, on 18 November 2015 - 12:25 PM, said:

the character limitation does not prevent someone from being polite and constructive. It's an excuse for being rude.

Kind of weird to hear it from you.

[Repasy Cooper]

Kira Onime, on 17 November 2015 - 10:42 PM, said:

Hard to be constructive when you're limited to ~140 characters so you have to get straight to the point.
But yeah, I guess I was negative in this scenario but I do give praise when praise is due.





Speaking of constructive.

Not difficult to understand really. He made an executive decision and decided your opinions are destructive, biased, and thus not of value to PGI. That doesn't reflect AT ALL about how he views the community's opinions, just yours. It's not like he sent you a cease & desist letter, you're welcome to continue tweeting how trash this game is. He just isn't listening anymore.

Get over it.

[BLOOD WOLF]

Repasy, on 18 November 2015 - 12:35 PM, said:

Not difficult to understand really. He made an executive decision and decided your opinions are destructive, biased, and thus not of value to PGI. That doesn't reflect AT ALL about how he views the community's opinions, just yours. It's not like he sent you a cease & desist letter, you're welcome to continue tweeting how trash this game is. He just isn't listening anymore.

Get over it.

[Kira Onime]

Repasy' said:

Get over it.

I have. I just found it funny when it happened.

[TKSax]

Sandpit, on 18 November 2015 - 11:51 AM, said:

Read those two quoted statements.

No it's not. If you're constructive and polite you have nothing to worry about.

So why did he block me Sandpit? https://twitter.com/...105847219986432 Becuase I was criticizing how he was talking to You and Roadbeer on Twitter. Russ get petulant and does not like when people disagree with him and boom you get blocked.

[BLOOD WOLF]

TKSax, on 18 November 2015 - 01:03 PM, said:

So why did he block me Sandpit? https://twitter.com/...105847219986432 Becuase I was criticizing how he was talking to You and Roadbeer on Twitter. Russ get petulant and does not like when people disagree with him and boom you get blocked.

funny you use the word petulant, and yey we can look at roadbeers(especially) post and their a step further, their putrid.

No bias right? of course your a fair guy and all.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 18 November 2015 - 01:07 PM.

[TKSax]

BLOOD WOLF, on 18 November 2015 - 01:05 PM, said:

funny you use the word petulant, and yey we can look at roadbeers(especially) post and their a step further, their putrid.

No bias right? of course your a fair guy and all.

Yet last that I knew Roadbeer was not blocked from Russ Twitter.. but I am because I called out his poor handling of people...

[BLOOD WOLF]

TKSax, on 18 November 2015 - 01:08 PM, said:

Yet last that I knew Roadbeer was not blocked from Russ Twitter.. but I am because I called out his poor handling of people...

I don't know who is blocked or not, All i am saying is you need to apply the same standard in your criticisms of people.

Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 18 November 2015 - 01:11 PM.