Jump to content

Cw Leaderboards Etc


3 replies to this topic

#1 Greyhart

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 894 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 27 November 2015 - 04:22 AM

It occurred to me, at some point whilst doing something else, that a simple way to make CW mean something is to have a simple leader board. So in part CW becomes like ranked matches.

I would a leader board for each type of unit and individuals. So:

Merc unit would compete on total c-bills earned.
Loyalist units would compete on most planets taken and held (largest increase in territory).
individuals would be on match score.

You'd have a season say 3 months and at the end of it prizes for the top teams.

there you go just a thought

#2 Appogee

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 10,967 posts
  • LocationOn planet Tukayyid, celebrating victory

Posted 27 November 2015 - 04:36 AM

Here's your Merc leaderboard:

Mercstar wins (due to consistently fielding more teams in CW more of the time than any other unit).

There you go ... saved PGI a lot of coding ;)

#3 Greyhart

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 894 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 27 November 2015 - 04:42 AM

well that is usually the reason people win these leader board things. Want to beat them then you have to engage more with CW.

#4 TWIAFU

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Pest
  • The Pest
  • 4,011 posts
  • LocationBell's Brewery, MI

Posted 27 November 2015 - 04:52 AM

View PostGreyhart, on 27 November 2015 - 04:42 AM, said:

well that is usually the reason people win these leader board things. Want to beat them then you have to engage more with CW.


Easy to beat them.

Just have to be lucky that you drop against them when they all are on their dummy accounts in CW.

And then watch a few well known Units rise to the top of leaderboards then then get kicked off for cheating and resulting Event rule changes.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users