Jump to content

All She Needs Is A Little Speed.


3 replies to this topic

#1 redlance

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 178 posts

Posted 14 December 2015 - 07:37 PM

the locust is extremely delicate in most conditions, to off set that, i say all she needs is to be faster. anything as weak and small as this mech just needs to have at least that going for it.

#2 Sereglach

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Fire
  • Fire
  • 1,563 posts
  • LocationWherever things are burning.

Posted 14 December 2015 - 08:57 PM

Personally, if they'd just get around to killing speed tweak (like it needs to be), then I could easily see giving the Locust a 220 engine cap and making it the fastest mech in the game, as it should be.

On the other hand, in the current situation I could certainly see increasing the engine cap to 200. That creates a minimal difference in weight; because even though the 200 is 1.5 tons heavier, you're also getting to ditch an external heat sink, giving back some critical space as well as removing 1 ton of external heat sink. Thusly you only have a net gain of .5 tons (minimal difference for most builds).

Funny enough . . . with the speed tweak nerf (and hopefully future death) we have no mechs that hit the 172ish kph speed cap at the moment. I have no problems with the Locust being buffed a bit in engine cap to get that speed back.

#3 Crenue

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 81 posts

Posted 22 January 2016 - 10:07 PM

I am ok if they kill the speed tweek. I just wish they let us do as we please with engine sizes then. For the love of God; Do Not make the mechs sound like they are being throttled back. It makes them feel slow

#4 ChapeL

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 1,363 posts

Posted 23 January 2016 - 02:56 AM

This game in general could use a little less speed across the board. We've got maps that are shoe boxes that a Locust can cross in seconds.





3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users