Current Diplomatic Stance Of House Marik
#21
Posted 01 January 2016 - 06:10 PM
#22
Posted 01 January 2016 - 06:17 PM
#23
Posted 01 January 2016 - 06:52 PM
Edited by Ramsess, 01 January 2016 - 09:48 PM.
#24
Posted 01 January 2016 - 06:55 PM
#25
Posted 01 January 2016 - 07:53 PM
Ramsess, on 01 January 2016 - 06:52 PM, said:
Keep it up Ramsess. At the rate your going(i.e. jumping to a ts while guys are in a drop against davion) you'll find HR-I joining those mercs. Is your one person Silver Hawk Unit ready for that fight?
Edited by Firearrow, 01 January 2016 - 08:30 PM.
#26
Posted 01 January 2016 - 09:14 PM
Leave it to a bunch of butt hurts to complain to people who have no control over what is going on.
#27
Posted 01 January 2016 - 09:47 PM
Firearrow, on 01 January 2016 - 07:53 PM, said:
Keep it up Ramsess. At the rate your going(i.e. jumping to a ts while guys are in a drop against davion) you'll find HR-I joining those mercs. Is your one person Silver Hawk Unit ready for that fight?
I did no go to your channel i was moved there.
I was only typing to one person and never asked to be moved.
Thanks for asking tho.
#28
Posted 01 January 2016 - 10:26 PM
Ramsess, on 01 January 2016 - 09:47 PM, said:
I did no go to your channel i was moved there.
I was only typing to one person and never asked to be moved.
Thanks for asking tho.
You still need to cool your jets. None of the Liao loyalists want a fight with Marik but your certainly not helping the situation. So maybe the best thing for you to do is stay in your unit bay for a few days and let cooler heads and more diplomatic people deal with the situation. K thanks.
#29
Posted 02 January 2016 - 09:23 AM
Firearrow, on 01 January 2016 - 10:26 PM, said:
You still need to cool your jets. None of the Liao loyalists want a fight with Marik but your certainly not helping the situation. So maybe the best thing for you to do is stay in your unit bay for a few days and let cooler heads and more diplomatic people deal with the situation. K thanks.
One nice thing is in a few months only the loyalists will be picking where to attack. This should take care of most problems. I don't plan on voting to attack liao. The two smallest factions shouldn't be fighting each other that's just stupid.
#30
Posted 02 January 2016 - 10:02 AM
Ramsess, on 01 January 2016 - 09:47 PM, said:
I did no go to your channel i was moved there.
I was only typing to one person and never asked to be moved.
Thanks for asking tho.
I moved you to the channel, because I was sick of having messages distract me, it was easier to talk to you that way.. Especially when I told you repeatedly that we were defending Styk, and you kept accusing our little group of attack some Marik world.
Before you start accusing pilots: drop on the planet, take a ******* screenshot and look at the names and tags.
Then you can troll Teamspeak servers for the units in question.
My unit tag is [-RL)]
#31
Posted 02 January 2016 - 10:03 AM
#32
Posted 02 January 2016 - 12:08 PM
Stoneblade, on 02 January 2016 - 10:02 AM, said:
Before you start accusing pilots: drop on the planet, take a ******* screenshot and look at the names and tags.
Then you can troll Teamspeak servers for the units in question.
My unit tag is [-RL)]
ok so how about you give us free reign to start firing back at your little "freelance" problem and helping "suggest" they find other planets to land on. We're kinda choosy about who gets our Space Bacon around here.
It's not the loyalist units ok, but we're STILL getting attacked and got planets disappearing from our border. So what is the proposal to change that because regardless of who is doing it, we're losing planets that we shouldn't be losing.
#33
Posted 02 January 2016 - 02:19 PM
Sandpit, on 02 January 2016 - 12:08 PM, said:
It's not the loyalist units ok, but we're STILL getting attacked and got planets disappearing from our border. So what is the proposal to change that because regardless of who is doing it, we're losing planets that we shouldn't be losing.
It is a loyalist unit causing the problem. There were 36 Liaos dropping on the Marik planet last night. Then we got TCAF taking a planet in EU primetime everyday and farming Marik pugs. Ive heard the excuse that they want TIkonov back but its deep in Davion territory so why are they here? Too farm thats why and if we dont protect our pugs with loyalist units then they will leave. They want a second front and its not going to stop when CW3 hits since they got the numbers to sway the vote. No, these attacks will continue as long as they are uncontested by loyalist units. We can either let them farm pugs or fight. Thats up to the council too decide but its not going to stop with CW3. They will still want planets for the rewards and one front will not be enough.
#34
Posted 02 January 2016 - 02:27 PM
beerandasmoke, on 02 January 2016 - 02:19 PM, said:
then we need to let the units claiming "abstinence" that we'll be caliming our rightful planets back but not pushing into their borders beyond that
#35
Posted 02 January 2016 - 04:58 PM
Sandpit, on 02 January 2016 - 02:27 PM, said:
Don't want to spoil your fun, but are you sure that we are actually able to fight Davion and Liao at the same time? Clearly not here in the EU-timezone. So even if Marik could take Liao planets during US-primetime, they would be lost again during EU-times.
#36
Posted 02 January 2016 - 05:30 PM
ccrider, on 01 January 2016 - 06:55 PM, said:
I may have something to discuss with you sir
Sthtopokeon, on 02 January 2016 - 04:58 PM, said:
Don't want to spoil your fun, but are you sure that we are actually able to fight Davion and Liao at the same time? Clearly not here in the EU-timezone. So even if Marik could take Liao planets during US-primetime, they would be lost again during EU-times.
who said anything about fighting Liao AND Davion?
#37
Posted 02 January 2016 - 06:00 PM
#39
Posted 02 January 2016 - 06:50 PM
Sandpit, on 02 January 2016 - 12:08 PM, said:
It's not the loyalist units ok, but we're STILL getting attacked and got planets disappearing from our border. So what is the proposal to change that because regardless of who is doing it, we're losing planets that we shouldn't be losing.
Read this.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users