Jump to content

Open War Declared


193 replies to this topic

#101 Kjudoon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 7,636 posts
  • LocationWisconsin

Posted 03 January 2016 - 08:38 PM

View PostZerex, on 03 January 2016 - 08:21 PM, said:

and yet you are indeed still here and biting ever time i cast out, for someone not buying anything your sure are spending a long time window shopping.

Seen me dropping lately?

Nope. didn't think so.

Been watching the Packer game... So depressing.

Edited by Kjudoon, 03 January 2016 - 08:39 PM.


#102 pbiggz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 4,713 posts
  • LocationOutreach

Posted 03 January 2016 - 08:39 PM

hey marik, liao was sleeping with your girlfriend.





am i instigating right?

#103 Barantor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,592 posts
  • LocationLexington, KY USA

Posted 03 January 2016 - 08:41 PM

View Postpbiggz, on 03 January 2016 - 08:39 PM, said:

hey marik, liao was sleeping with your girlfriend.





am i instigating right?



Oh no are you 'declaring open war' too?

Posted Image

#104 Tesunie

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Seeker
  • The Seeker
  • 8,586 posts
  • LocationSeraphim HQ: Asuncion

Posted 03 January 2016 - 09:04 PM

So, all of Marik takes a unit's wrath from a faction we supposedly have a truce with... because a few people (a single unit) said some hurtful things.... Sounds fair. (Not.)


I recall the same thing happen before. It was with the Combine and a certain unit (no names mentioned NKVA) who trashed talked a lot of people. Marik was split on if we wanted to declare a war about it. The fighting units said no, because NKVA was not all of the Combine. The inactive units seemed to have voted yes and made it public. Boy was that a mess...


A few points of reminder:
- It's a game. It's suppose to be fun.
- It's a team based game. You are suppose to work together with your fellow players. In this case, you are allied with Liao, than you should technically follow what would benefit your faction best.
- In CW, if you attack a faction, you often times wont get a specific unit. Thus, your whole vendetta with a specific unit (who isn't even a loyalist nor committed to the faction) ends up being against other players not involved and just trying to play a game.
- It's a game. Enjoy the game itself, and ignore the prattle of some of the player base. (Even when they could use some sense slapped into them.)


And for the record, I'm responding not knowing the reasons for the hostilities.

#105 Karl Marlow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,277 posts

Posted 03 January 2016 - 09:16 PM

*yawn*

Someone who has been attacking us and boasting about it is now making a declaration that he is going to be attacking us.

How is this news?

Edited by ThomasMarik, 03 January 2016 - 09:17 PM.


#106 Tesunie

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Seeker
  • The Seeker
  • 8,586 posts
  • LocationSeraphim HQ: Asuncion

Posted 03 January 2016 - 09:21 PM

View PostZerex, on 03 January 2016 - 07:01 PM, said:

We're not losing our faction planets though. glad your enjoying us taking your stuff Posted Image


Have you considered that, maybe we aren't trying to take back planets because we don't want to anger our allies?

When you leave that faction, we'll work it out with the Loyalist Liao and probably reclaim some of those worlds. Till then, we'll either defend ourselves, or leave it for Ghost drops.


I personally have no vested interest in your little war against a specific merc unit who temporarily moved into Marik control (I use this term loosely). Though I may have started in Davion, and my Davion contacts continue to warn me against Liao, Marik has had a strong relationship with Liao since the beginning of CW. I suspect we will continue to have good relations with Liao (despite my Davion contacts warning) even longer still. We've had no reason to attack each other, besides as an occasional training skirmish, with no intent to actually take any planets.


PS: Last I saw, Davion was attacking Liao and taking planets. I would think your faction would prefer you attacking Davion, or defending against them instead.

#107 maniacos

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 777 posts

Posted 04 January 2016 - 01:09 AM

View PostZerex, on 03 January 2016 - 07:51 PM, said:

Clearly said in these posts i don't speak for my unit, just the CW side at this moment in time.


>OPEN WAR DECLARED
>we Antares Scorpions openly declare that we have been aggrieved and will attack Marik space to defend our name
>didn't speak for my unit

Honestly, you are just too obvious, chap. Your whole unit must either rolling around in laugher or facepalming about your failing in their name.

Edited by Jherek C, 04 January 2016 - 01:18 AM.


#108 Jaspbo1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 232 posts
  • LocationWoah

Posted 04 January 2016 - 01:24 AM

Who let the Space Communists get their hands on some 'mechs again? Jeez you guys.

#109 HelloKittyWarfare

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • IS Exemplar
  • IS Exemplar
  • 122 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 04 January 2016 - 01:37 AM

let it be, jherek.
to fail depends on the point of view. AS make successfull attacks on marik worlds. thats all that matters for someone. others don't care about tempoary gains and take it as some kind of a flu...and let it pass by.

all i can say is:
i respect the piloting skill of AS. maybe they are fun to drop with, too. i just don't know.
but this declaration of war-nonsense is a joke at all. you can't declare a war weeks after you started aggressions and think anyone takes it serious...and your "reason" is...not so well suitable. but it's up to you to shape your...reputation.

i'm not sure if this is some joke from AS-side, but everyone else has fun and demands more popcorn.

#110 Saint Atlas and the Commando Elf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 595 posts

Posted 04 January 2016 - 02:32 AM

Well, planets lost - forum war won. At least we got our priorities right (no irony).

Thx to Kjudoon, Barantor, Jherek and others for providing valuable memes.

As a gesture of goodwill I'd like to share the traditional song of my people from clan purple bird with you AS to hopefully overcome our dissent. Now will you please form a circle and take each other by the hands while I tune in the music...



#111 Zerex

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • 298 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 04 January 2016 - 02:41 AM

As always I only speak for myself in my views, but this is all just for fun, just like all other CW conflicts we have started in the off seasons, I have said that anything said should be taken with a pinch of salt, the truth is we were hired to fight for Liao and have found little in the way of unit vs unit warfare, so we have changed boarders a few times looking for a good fight, a fun fight, when we found no units we went fishing, looking to hopefully draw out a unit to fight.
The fact is we have less than 6 days on our contract I believe at which point we will most likely leave Liao space and when the comp seasons restart CW won't see much of us bar maybe a few AS players solo dropping, time and time again people have said these threads have been the most entertaining thing in ages. I really hope everyone has had fun with it, it's what we are here for.
o7

#112 maniacos

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 777 posts

Posted 04 January 2016 - 02:53 AM

View PostSthtopokeon, on 04 January 2016 - 02:32 AM, said:

Well, planets lost - forum war won. At least we got our priorities right (no irony).


At the same time we gained alot of planets and pushing forward on the Davion front thanks to the coordinated work of Marik house units and mercs. Keeping focus paid very well in this war against Davion. Remembrance to the poor seal souls lost on quarrelings at Liao border.

View PostZerex, on 04 January 2016 - 02:41 AM, said:

I really hope everyone has had fun with it, it's what we are here for.
o7


No hard feelings. It was entertaining
o7

Edited by Jherek C, 04 January 2016 - 02:56 AM.


#113 Zerex

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • 298 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 04 January 2016 - 03:47 AM

No hard feelings, it always is entertaining when we do CW.

Edited by Zerex, 04 January 2016 - 03:48 AM.


#114 multisoul

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Hero of Marik
  • 329 posts

Posted 04 January 2016 - 04:49 AM

much better to have a front with other houses, because there are not enough clanners most of the time

#115 A Bag Full of Puppies

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 36 posts

Posted 04 January 2016 - 04:54 AM

Warm Fuzzies Intensify...

*dumping leftover popcorn*

#116 Zerex

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • The Tip of the Spear
  • 298 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 04 January 2016 - 05:52 AM

View PostA Bag Full of Puppies, on 04 January 2016 - 04:54 AM, said:

Warm Fuzzies Intensify...

*dumping leftover popcorn*

You have leftover popcorn? How much did you make?

#117 InvisibleJim

    Member

  • Pip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 14 posts

Posted 04 January 2016 - 06:24 AM

I await the deluge of Purple Budgies communications demanding compensation for lost planets, mech repair costs and irreparably damages egos. Posted Image
Oh wait... we already have two threads. Posted Image

#118 Wildstreak

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 5,154 posts

Posted 04 January 2016 - 06:49 AM

These 2 topics are funny because of all the Liao BS.
The Antares Scorpions claim they don't roleplay or care about agreements between some Faction members to have no conflict on borders then start their own topic involving roleplaying making a big deal about agreements they 'supposedly' don't care about. That's on top of the outright lies posted by troll accounts of theirs and lies about wanting tough fights. The lie of Marik beaking agreements when the topic linked to in the OP has Liao players flat out admitting it was not Marik but Liao that broke things off.
Pretty clear that ***, the unit name for Antares, is full of it. Now Clans, Steiner and FRR know why we have only seen a Liao unit once up north.

#119 Kjudoon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 7,636 posts
  • LocationWisconsin

Posted 04 January 2016 - 07:01 AM

View PostInvisibleJim, on 04 January 2016 - 06:24 AM, said:

I await the deluge of Purple Budgies communications demanding compensation for lost planets, mech repair costs and irreparably damages egos. Posted Image
Oh wait... we already have two threads. Posted Image

That's Mr. Purple Budgies of Doom to you, buddy.

Quote

These 2 topics are funny because of all the Liao BS.
The Antares Scorpions claim they don't roleplay or care about agreements between some Faction members to have no conflict on borders then start their own topic involving roleplaying making a big deal about agreements they 'supposedly' don't care about. That's on top of the outright lies posted by troll accounts of theirs and lies about wanting tough fights. The lie of Marik beaking agreements when the topic linked to in the OP has Liao players flat out admitting it was not Marik but Liao that broke things off.
Pretty clear that ***, the unit name for Antares, is full of it. Now Clans, Steiner and FRR know why we have only seen a Liao unit once up north.


Posted Image

#120 Joe Decker

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Angel
  • The Angel
  • 685 posts
  • LocationTeutoburger Forest, Lower Saxony

Posted 04 January 2016 - 08:01 AM

View PostZerex, on 04 January 2016 - 02:41 AM, said:

The fact is we have less than 6 days on our contract I believe at which point we will most likely leave Liao space


I am so sad seeing you leave ...

Posted Image







10 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users