The Marik/liao Confusion
#81
Posted 14 January 2016 - 05:42 AM
#82
Posted 14 January 2016 - 03:29 PM
ThomasMarik, on 13 January 2016 - 05:46 PM, said:
Marik allies with Davion = 1 front war with Liao not counting Steiner & Kurita.
Marik allies with Liao = 1 front war with Davion not counting Steiner & Kurita.
Where exactly is this 2 front war with Davion and Liao with 1 of them an ally?
Unless you want Davion and Liao to ally, hmmmmm.
#83
Posted 14 January 2016 - 03:39 PM
I say risk b/c maybe they wouldn't, after you mend fences and get planets back....
But you'd still always be looking over your shoulder.
#84
Posted 17 January 2016 - 10:42 PM
#85
Posted 18 January 2016 - 08:33 PM
In one case, literally saying "So you can whack some (sic) purple pidgeons.". The other two, as far as I can tell haven't touched a single Davion world and have exclusively been attacking Marik planets. None of them were names or players I was familiar with.
Thanks to not having any ability to leash units, as far as I can tell the Confederation is being used as a proxy to attack Marik and these new units are actively attempting to recruit Liao PUGs, either as new unit members or simply to assault FWL worlds, and the resulting chaos is enough to stir up regular units who have no idea what's going on at the PUG level of things.
This is a fundamental flaw in CW. It's hosed a relationship Liao and Marik have maintained for months if not years at this point. Given the only faction that benefits, as far as I can tell we are literally being used by Davion to attack Marik by proxy, to lure Liao PUGs into thinking this is the status quo, and there is very little we can do about it as it's gotten to the point of flinging poop each other's ways and the actual Liao players not wanting to fight/just getting pissy about the whole idiotic situation while the PUGs and proxy mercs go at it full bore with Marik- and naturally now that the FWL is hitting back, losing.
#86
Posted 18 January 2016 - 10:01 PM
What changed this time was That it was TCAF taking worlds. At first it was ignored. I believe it was the planet Phact which was actually in a cluster of worlds you took from Davion so we shrugged. Then it kept happening. Next thing we know we are seeing loyalist voices joining the Liao mercs. We started defending worlds but only half heartedly since we weren't sure what was going on. We saw loyalist units as well as the mercs.
So from our perspective what was at first just mercs being stupid turned I to a full on invasion. So we were forced to act. The war council reached a decision and Alex Reed layer out the operations goals and purpose in his operation flaming sword post. So with the goal of taking 8 planets back we started fighting. When we were +6 in the first 3 days we figured it would be over before the next weekend.
Then a curious thing happened. Despite loyalists saying they were going to let us take back 8 worlds wenfoubd loyalists fighting tooth and nail to keep them. In fact they were dedication themselves to ghost dropping the planets back. We were also seeing a complete abandonment of the Davion front to come fight Marik.
This is all fine but it doesn't look like a faction that is willing to give the planets back and be buddy buddy. This has gone on long enough that actual cooperation and integration is happening with Davion and we are also grabbing merc units to fight Liao. This might not stop at 8 planets simply due to inertia. Even if we did stop at 8 I don't know how easy it would be to shift the attack to Davion. We would probably have to look north. Steiner and Kurita already have their hand full. Should we remain friends with Davion it would seem Kurita is the most logical choice which pulls pressure of of them to reinforce their Liao border.
It's all speculation on my part where this goes. All I know for sure is Liao has damaged their relationship with Marik and it wasn't mercs that caused it.
Edited by ThomasMarik, 18 January 2016 - 10:03 PM.
#87
Posted 19 January 2016 - 12:42 AM
wanderer, on 18 January 2016 - 08:33 PM, said:
In one case, literally saying "So you can whack some (sic) purple pidgeons.". The other two, as far as I can tell haven't touched a single Davion world and have exclusively been attacking Marik planets. None of them were names or players I was familiar with.
Thanks to not having any ability to leash units, as far as I can tell the Confederation is being used as a proxy to attack Marik and these new units are actively attempting to recruit Liao PUGs, either as new unit members or simply to assault FWL worlds, and the resulting chaos is enough to stir up regular units who have no idea what's going on at the PUG level of things.
This is a fundamental flaw in CW. It's hosed a relationship Liao and Marik have maintained for months if not years at this point. Given the only faction that benefits, as far as I can tell we are literally being used by Davion to attack Marik by proxy, to lure Liao PUGs into thinking this is the status quo, and there is very little we can do about it as it's gotten to the point of flinging poop each other's ways and the actual Liao players not wanting to fight/just getting pissy about the whole idiotic situation while the PUGs and proxy mercs go at it full bore with Marik- and naturally now that the FWL is hitting back, losing.
One good thing coming with CW3 will be loyalists voting on fronts.
The big concern is people smurfing loyalist accounts to sway votes on fronts. I'm not entirely sure how to address it.
Perhaps require a unit population and regular play above X amount to be able to vote? Based off average activity in the faction? So only the loyalist units who play regularly in Liao get to vote?
I dunno. Seems problematic in its own right. Same with the tag/tagless queue split; I get the concept but the execution seems like it'll just make more issues.
#88
Posted 19 January 2016 - 02:54 AM
Regardless if peace and a return to the non aggression pact is what is truly desired by Loyalists wishing to stay true to their faction and their previous words, it may be time to put our money where our mouth is.
#89
Posted 19 January 2016 - 03:01 AM
However those Marik pilots advocating an 8 planet push were near drowned out by those baying 'Death to Liao' and falling over themselves to jump into bed with the Davions.
Just as a reminder, since your memory seems selective, you are a prime offender in both instances.
Wanting your planets back and taking steps to ensure that is one thing. Most Liao loyalists wouldnt have objected (TCAF excepted because who knows what they're thinking these days).
Allying with our number one most hated enemy however and coordinating with them to do so? Nuh uh, thats not 'taking your planets back', you're fooling nobody here matey.
What was the glorious Marik high command going to do if a week later we'd handed back the planets they wanted without contest?
Do you really expect us to believe that after the diplomatic overtures you made to the FedRats that you'd have gone back to attacking them straight away? Or would you have kept your NAP with them, resumed your NAP with us and left yourself with no fronts?
I call foul, there was no plan to stop at eight planets. The Capellan Confederation is not fooled by you or your fellow Davions-in-Mariks-clothing.
#90
Posted 19 January 2016 - 03:35 AM
Posts last me this from both sides is why I put out that proposal to hopefully cool off hot heads and hotter tongues.
Some people need a consequence and or a time out till they get it back together.
#91
Posted 19 January 2016 - 04:19 AM
We can all agree that Marik was the wounded party, that TCAFs aggression, not Mercs, caused this situation, and that Marik had a right to reclaim her planets back.
Allying with Davion, offering to open a lane for Steiner, promoting open warfare on our front? Thats more then taking your due and until Marik high command can succesfully leash and muzzle those elements seeking to push us further into warfare we will remain cynical.
(As an aside, no need for real life head cooling, everybody is role-playing as far as I can tell, planets and CW mean nothing so this is just for funsies until PGI gives us something real to work towards)
#92
Posted 19 January 2016 - 04:24 AM
#93
Posted 19 January 2016 - 12:47 PM
Heart of Storm, on 19 January 2016 - 03:01 AM, said:
Sandpit, on 19 January 2016 - 12:42 PM, said:
#94
Posted 19 January 2016 - 10:21 PM
But I am not sure if the Goal of the Operation is already met (or close to that). If it is met I see no Reason for future Hostilities.
Edited by Joe Decker, 19 January 2016 - 10:21 PM.
#95
Posted 20 January 2016 - 06:46 AM
this thread is awesome!
#96
Posted 20 January 2016 - 07:16 AM
Joe Decker, on 19 January 2016 - 10:21 PM, said:
But I am not sure if the Goal of the Operation is already met (or close to that). If it is met I see no Reason for future Hostilities.
The goal of the original Op was eight planets. Marik had taken only four as of yesterday. As TCAF continues to counterattack our gains, who knows how long the War Council will hold to their original 8. If the situation keeps getting inflamed, it could turn into a race for Sian very quickly. After all, using TCAF logic, we are not in Phase Three yet...
#97
Posted 20 January 2016 - 10:23 AM
The mentality of "Hey, we decided treaties don't matter now so we're attacking. Nothing personal while we ghost drop the **** out of your worlds when most of you are not on. Totally expect you to go back to honoring the treaty later! Gawl, why are you like that? We only broke the treaty without discussing it this time because we wanted to! Why can't you just pretend we didn't later?"
Doesn't work that way. Never did. Frustrating situation to be in, but at least Liao has plenty of options to drop, right?
#98
Posted 22 January 2016 - 02:45 AM
Alex Reed, on 20 January 2016 - 07:16 AM, said:
you know the same rouge mercs that lured tcaf into this position is trying to do the same with marik now. your planetary gain will come when those warmongers fly under your badge.
#99
Posted 22 January 2016 - 06:15 AM
#100
Posted 22 January 2016 - 09:01 AM
Danjo San, on 22 January 2016 - 02:45 AM, said:
Nah, eight planets, and we are good. Us Marik are far more in control of our loyalists.
9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users