Is Fire Control Considered A Cheat
#1
Posted 30 January 2016 - 02:40 PM
#2
Posted 30 January 2016 - 03:08 PM
Edited by IronClaws, 30 January 2016 - 03:08 PM.
#3
Posted 30 January 2016 - 05:11 PM
Since lots of mice and keyboards come with macro capabilities, they really can't ban them. Like it or not it's a part of gaming these days.
The 3rd party programs that Russ was warning about were things like wallhacks and aimbots. They let you do things that you couldn't otherwise do.
#4
Posted 30 January 2016 - 05:31 PM
#5
Posted 30 January 2016 - 05:44 PM
I agree, you will find it more gratifying in the long run to learn to do things w/o macros or FC and thereby learn control and management...
#6
Posted 30 January 2016 - 05:55 PM
Darwins Dog, on 30 January 2016 - 05:11 PM, said:
I only consider macros unsportsmanlike because they allow you to press keys faster than you (most likely) could physically.
Ironically Ironclad Irony, on 30 January 2016 - 05:44 PM, said:
I agree, you will find it more gratifying in the long run to learn to do things w/o macros or FC and thereby learn control and management...
A mistake can cost a match regardless of what macros or programs you are using.
#7
Posted 30 January 2016 - 07:02 PM
#8
Posted 30 January 2016 - 08:16 PM
They are always doing this for selfish reasons too. They don't like some feature because a/ it doesn't help them in THEIR preferred mech or playstyle. Or b/ It somehow prevents them from killing other mechs as easily as they wish they could with their particular build/playstyle.
Using a simple button macro, or taking advantage of the "signal jammed" message to warn you of an approaching mech you can't see is not the same thing as using an aim bot, or whatever other hack programs the insecure scum who cheat like to use...
We should avoid conflating the two.
#9
Posted 01 February 2016 - 11:00 AM
Every single time it was deemed OK.
Also, FC hitting keys faster than you could do physically is *still* not a cheat in terms of MWO - the weapons are in the game in a form where you could not hit fire fast enough to max out 4xAC2 in chain fire, and the game itself does not do chain fire properly (ie fire rate of one weapon divided by the number of weapons) so FC is only allowing you to do something that you *should* be able to do without macros.
The plain fact of the matter is that chain fire is no better than alpha, and is arguably worse. It's more about the Lulz.
It's better that there are tools freely available so that everyone can do it, rather than only people with coding knowledge or fancy mice with programming software.
#10
Posted 16 February 2016 - 05:27 AM
#11
Posted 16 February 2016 - 12:04 PM
JanosRide, on 16 February 2016 - 05:27 AM, said:
#12
Posted 16 February 2016 - 12:14 PM
Svarn Lornon, on 16 February 2016 - 12:04 PM, said:
How the heck did you even understand him.
#13
Posted 16 February 2016 - 09:23 PM
I asked PGI's support about FireCtrl last year and was told its not an issue/cheating. Personally I only use it for tag and zoom functions (i.e. the roller) with my mouse. I like to fast fire my UACs and sometimes jam them... its just part of the game.
So have fun and don't stress over it.
#14
Posted 16 February 2016 - 09:58 PM
#15
Posted 17 February 2016 - 12:03 PM
If this is the case, FC could eliminate the chance of them jamming, but only by stopping you from using the double shot (ie enable "Limit fire rate to specified rate" in FC).
You could then use the "Change Fire Rate" binding to double the fire rate, thus enabling double-shot mode.
In this way, you could have control over when you use double-shot - you must be in the "Double rate" mode to use double shot. When not in "Double rate" mode, even if you hit the button quicker, it would ignore the button press, so even if you get a little trigger happy when in single shot mode, it would protect you from unintentionally triggering the double-shot of the UACs and incurring a chance of a jam.
#16
Posted 18 February 2016 - 12:38 PM
Padre Balistique, on 16 February 2016 - 12:14 PM, said:
#17
Posted 18 February 2016 - 01:48 PM
#18
Posted 18 February 2016 - 02:46 PM
BrianZX2, on 18 February 2016 - 01:48 PM, said:
This is a video game, not the International Criminal Court in The Hague. If PGI says macros are allowed, then they are. Anything else is just being stubborn.
#19
Posted 18 February 2016 - 03:00 PM
Mystere, on 18 February 2016 - 02:46 PM, said:
This is a video game, not the International Criminal Court in The Hague. If PGI says macros are allowed, then they are. Anything else is just being stubborn.
Good to know mech players know how to think for themselves. Thanks for bringing up a moot point. Please read my whole post because I don't dispute the utility or legitimacy of FireControl my problem with it is that its a 3rd party tool.
Edited by BrianZX2, 18 February 2016 - 03:04 PM.
#20
Posted 18 February 2016 - 03:11 PM
BrianZX2, on 18 February 2016 - 03:00 PM, said:
So are Teamspeak 3 and Thrustmaster's TARGET. Should they be banned too?
7 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users