An interesting thought about the timeline
#1
Posted 13 July 2012 - 03:52 AM
#2
Posted 13 July 2012 - 03:56 AM
#3
Posted 13 July 2012 - 03:58 AM
#4
Posted 13 July 2012 - 03:58 AM
#6
Posted 13 July 2012 - 04:03 AM
Steel Prophet, on 13 July 2012 - 03:58 AM, said:
They did? Source please!
Ya know what i cant seem to dig it out so I may be wrong, but it was one of the threads discussing the clans (yeah, lots of those to dig through), and I coulda swore i saw a dev post that mentioned that as far as THAT goes they may need to break cannon.
#7
Posted 13 July 2012 - 04:09 AM
#8
Posted 13 July 2012 - 04:11 AM
#9
Posted 13 July 2012 - 04:19 AM
#11
Posted 13 July 2012 - 04:22 AM
Teirdome, on 13 July 2012 - 04:19 AM, said:
Well said. We're breaking from canon in terms of if border skirmishes occurred with the frequency they'll be occurring in MWO, there's no way the Houses would be able to replace their losses fast enough, or even train enough pilots, given the fact that we'll be smashing dozens of brigades per day.
#12
Posted 13 July 2012 - 04:23 AM
let me edit this in, FASA let the players create the timeline, after FASA fell the timeline was added to by writers and not players and writers. I think if it went back to that a player action and writers work mixed it would be very kick ***.
Edited by Thorgar Wulfson, 13 July 2012 - 04:27 AM.
#13
Posted 13 July 2012 - 05:13 AM
Thorgar Wulfson, on 13 July 2012 - 04:23 AM, said:
let me edit this in, FASA let the players create the timeline, after FASA fell the timeline was added to by writers and not players and writers. I think if it went back to that a player action and writers work mixed it would be very kick ***.
sadly that's how warhammer used to be. i believe it was 93? when they did the war of the beard?
i always think having the fans help make the story line is a good thing.
#15
Posted 13 July 2012 - 05:23 AM
thontor, on 13 July 2012 - 05:19 AM, said:
And he would have this big ball of of red goo that he could put a drop of it in the core of Sian and blow it up! (die Cap scum!)
Then we could just make stuff up from that point on and it wouldnt mess with canon!
if you don't get the Star Trek movie reference, go watch that movie!
lol, well if we can change events that we take part in then we can change what will happen as we are in 3049 not 3055. hell just by being run by players we will change outcomes of certain battles which effected the timeline. it would be harder to mimic the cannon than just roll with what happens lol.
#16
Posted 13 July 2012 - 05:28 AM
Thorgar Wulfson, on 13 July 2012 - 04:09 AM, said:
Meanie
Just kidding. Still, I think whatever is done, it should be done sensibly. While Im sure the differences will be many and varied, an effort needs to be made to make sure the overall feeling and atmosphere of the universe remains similar.
#17
Posted 13 July 2012 - 05:30 AM
The players would only ever be able to change things in era's where nothing interesting happened, like the period after the War of 3039 till 3049 and the gap between the Jihad and Dark Ages.
#18
Posted 14 July 2012 - 10:30 AM
#19
Posted 14 July 2012 - 10:59 AM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users