

Another (I Want One) Mech Thread - The Chameleon
#1
Posted 15 February 2016 - 07:40 PM
For those of us who began with the hex battletech and then the c64 crescent hawks inception this is perhaps one of, if not the most, nostalgic mech.
<3 Chameleon forever
#2
Posted 15 February 2016 - 07:43 PM
#3
Posted 15 February 2016 - 07:56 PM
The Chamaleon is been the first mech I piloted, in the training and learning session of that manual.
U cannot forget the first
#4
Posted 15 February 2016 - 08:01 PM
#5
Posted 15 February 2016 - 08:33 PM
#6
Posted 15 February 2016 - 08:56 PM
#8
Posted 16 February 2016 - 04:10 AM
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Chameleon
#9
Posted 16 February 2016 - 04:11 AM
#10
Posted 16 February 2016 - 04:32 AM

#11
Posted 16 February 2016 - 05:32 AM
Marketh, on 15 February 2016 - 07:40 PM, said:
For those of us who began with the hex battletech and then the c64 crescent hawks inception this is perhaps one of, if not the most, nostalgic mech.
<3 Chameleon forever
Yes, there are some sentimental feelings towards the Chameleon. Actually, I was extremely pleased when I managed to escape with that 'Mech in BattleTech: Crescent Hawk's Inception.
I have nothing against that 'Mech, I am not sure if modelling that 'Mech would be worth the effort.
And there are some very similar 'Mechs (50-ton laserboats) in MWO:
- CRB-27sl Crab
- CN9-AL Centurion
- HBK-4P Hunchback
- TBT-5J Trebuchet
Edited by martian, 16 February 2016 - 05:44 AM.
#12
Posted 16 February 2016 - 08:53 AM
martian, on 16 February 2016 - 05:32 AM, said:
I have nothing against that 'Mech, I am not sure if modelling that 'Mech would be worth the effort.
And there are some very similar 'Mechs (50-ton laserboats) in MWO:
- CRB-27sl Crab
- CN9-AL Centurion
- HBK-4P Hunchback
- TBT-5J Trebuchet
But also, it is possible to differentiate all those mechs using very different quirks, cooldown/structure/heat eff./range/speed/etc.
#13
Posted 16 February 2016 - 09:13 AM
JagdFlanker, on 16 February 2016 - 04:10 AM, said:
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Chameleon
I'm afraid I need to quote you. Because that idea is amazing! A mech designed as a trainer, being given out to new players, so they can train in. Mind blowing!
Edit: Also, the only variant that appears to break construction rules is the:
TRC-4B
"A formerly common but now obscure training 'Mech, the TRC-4B was armed with one Large Laser, two Medium Lasers, four Small Lasers and two Machine Guns. With only 10 normal heat sinks this 'Mech was quite prone to overheating. As manufactured, this 'Mech is perhaps the only Level 1 official (if not canonical) design with 3 critical spaces of equipment installed in the center torso, (two Machine Guns and half a ton of ammo), in violation of the design rules released with it. Additionally, as released, a quarter ton of armor remained unallocated."
Edited by Pariah Devalis, 16 February 2016 - 09:17 AM.
#14
Posted 16 February 2016 - 11:10 AM
Pariah Devalis, on 16 February 2016 - 09:13 AM, said:
TRC-4B
"A formerly common but now obscure training 'Mech, the TRC-4B was armed with one Large Laser, two Medium Lasers, four Small Lasers and two Machine Guns. With only 10 normal heat sinks this 'Mech was quite prone to overheating. As manufactured, this 'Mech is perhaps the only Level 1 official (if not canonical) design with 3 critical spaces of equipment installed in the center torso, (two Machine Guns and half a ton of ammo), in violation of the design rules released with it. Additionally, as released, a quarter ton of armor remained unallocated."
Sarna is wrong. That 'Mech is okay.
#15
Posted 16 February 2016 - 11:24 AM
MON-66 Mongoose
HCT-3F/5S Hatchetman (Not holding my breath for this one, would be silly until they add melee mechanics)
EXT-4D Exterminator
THG-11E Thug
ANH-2A Annihilator
Also wouldn't mind Harmony Gold allowing a MWO version of the Phoenix Hawk and Crusader to be made.
#16
Posted 16 February 2016 - 11:58 AM
#17
Posted 16 February 2016 - 12:08 PM
Its a nice mech I would get it, but its not close to being top of my want list at the present time
#18
Posted 16 February 2016 - 12:17 PM
#20
Posted 16 February 2016 - 12:29 PM
Jae Hyun Nakamura, on 16 February 2016 - 12:17 PM, said:
Actually, the one in the 3055+ Technical Readouts was a refit of the original. The original Chameleon was a Star League era mech that was lost. The one in the later Technical Readouts was a revival of that design, not a new mech altogether.
Edit: martian, you beat me to that response.. lol.. but we both knew it was an old Star League mech..
Edited by Nyte Kitsune, 16 February 2016 - 12:32 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users