#61
Posted 14 March 2016 - 08:49 AM
what clan battlemechs got? highlander with 1 ballistic, 3 energy, 3 missile, orion-c with 2 ballistics 2 energy 1 missile...
really. no. there are really few clan battlemechs with decent hardpoints and ZERO quirks.
#62
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:15 AM
brroleg, on 12 March 2016 - 12:06 PM, said:
In 2 words: Buff Omnimechs.
No.
Only 3 of the 4 Clan Battlemechs are exceptionally good, save for the Lowlander IIC (At least to me).
You wanna buff clan mechs that can swap omnipods and literally have the same exact builds regardless of the variant? That's a big no no for me.
Corrado, on 14 March 2016 - 08:49 AM, said:
what clan battlemechs got? highlander with 1 ballistic, 3 energy, 3 missile, orion-c with 2 ballistics 2 energy 1 missile...
really. no. there are really few clan battlemechs with decent hardpoints and ZERO quirks.
Hunchback IIC and Jenner IIC being two of them. The Orion IIC has some low slung hardpoints but to me is made up in agility via a big engine.
#63
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:17 AM
Quote
In other thread someone suggested to add new omnipods with different set of hardpoints. This will be good buff without actual "buff"
here http://mwomercs.com/..._20__p__5076112
Edited by brroleg, 14 March 2016 - 09:19 AM.
#64
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:18 AM
Malachy Karrde, on 13 March 2016 - 04:55 PM, said:
Tier 2 huh...
You do know you get Tier 3 players in some of your matches you know >.>
TamCoan, on 14 March 2016 - 07:52 AM, said:
While I thought they were going to be better than omnimechs, they aren't. They have plenty of weaknesses to make up for the clantech advantage in a battlemech.
Orion IIC is my Favorite of the 4, the Jenner 2nd, Hunchback 3rd, and Highlander... last
And to illustrate your last sentence, this is very true and this can't be put in simpler words.
#65
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:20 AM
Scout Derek, on 14 March 2016 - 09:15 AM, said:
You wanna buff clan mechs that can swap omnipods and literally have the same exact builds regardless of the variant? That's a big no no for me.
Considering that you can only drive one mech at a time, why on earth is that relevant to game balance???
#66
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:22 AM
brroleg, on 14 March 2016 - 09:17 AM, said:
That's the better solution, why give quirks when hardpoints are a better alternative?
Per say, it'd be like a battlemech, why quirk just one variant of a chassis which could cause bad balancing when you can introduce a new variant with different hardpoints that satisfies the requirements of what people want.
Widowmaker1981, on 14 March 2016 - 09:20 AM, said:
Considering that you can only drive one mech at a time, why on earth is that relevant to game balance???
One word, rather two that is: Community Warfare
for the clans in CW, you can have 3 Stormcrows with the same, exact, build. Per say, that means I can have 3 Streakcrows, hell, 4 streakcrows considering 2 stormcrows are 110 tons.
Or how about 3 Timberwolfs with 3 mediums and 2 Large pulse with jump jets?
Edited by Scout Derek, 14 March 2016 - 09:23 AM.
#67
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:26 AM
Scout Derek, on 14 March 2016 - 09:22 AM, said:
One word, rather two that is: Community Warfare
for the clans in CW, you can have 3 Stormcrows with the same, exact, build. Per say, that means I can have 3 Streakcrows, hell, 4 streakcrows considering 2 stormcrows are 110 tons.
Or how about 3 Timberwolfs with 3 mediums and 2 Large pulse with jump jets?
How about the fact that it entirely possible to buy multiple of the same mech variant for CW anyway? I own 2 BJ-3s, 2 TDR-5SS, 2 BNC-3Ms and 2 GHR-5Ps....
the ONLY thing that matters for mech balancing is what that single mech at one time can do in a match. Anything outside the match is just convenience.
Edited by Widowmaker1981, 14 March 2016 - 09:28 AM.
#68
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:29 AM
Widowmaker1981, on 14 March 2016 - 09:26 AM, said:
How about the fact that it entirely possible to buy multiple of the same mech variant for CW anyway? I own 2 BJ-3s, 2 TDR-5SS, 2 BNC-3Ms and 2 GHR-5Ps....
Even then, it's bad. It allows people who are leveling mechs to use same builds (I'm still talking clan mechs Right now) instead of the IS, who, if they want to level their mech and use it in CW, have to, like the clans, use a different variant, but lack the advantage of changing hardpoints to satisfy the player's playstyle.
#69
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:31 AM
Scout Derek, on 14 March 2016 - 09:29 AM, said:
People leveling mechs in CW are not relevant to mech balancing.
You are advocating that mechs should be worse, because they are more convenient, which at endgame (when you have all the mechs you want, all the money you need and no leveling to do) is irrelevant.
#70
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:35 AM
Widowmaker1981, on 14 March 2016 - 09:31 AM, said:
People leveling mechs in CW are not relevant to mech balancing.
You are advocating that mechs should be worse, because they are more convenient, which at endgame (when you have all the mechs you want, all the money you need and no leveling to do) is irrelevant.
Just how many people are at endgame? I would say a little under a tenth of the people that play this game are at endgame, which most, spend $
I do too, but the thing is, I don't play everyday, I don't spend the most and nor do I care that you say I advocate that mechs in all should be worse, I'm saying that omnimechs in general, should not be quirked, not all of them, but a majority should not be.
Most, if not all mechs are not bad, the pilot usually is, and if someone blames a mech for being bad, they better have a hellva reason on why it's bad.
#71
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:48 AM
brroleg, on 12 March 2016 - 01:04 PM, said:
Nope. ACH is still better. Jenner IIC is derp better because it packs some bigger boom and can prey on clueless heavies and assaults, but overall ACH does it better.
The Highlander IIC is not better than ANY of the other Clan assaults. It might be as good as Mr Gargs. But even that's a stretch.
Hunchback IIC is ~ = the stormcrow, for it's variability in build options, but the SCR is better overall with little thought needing to be put in to it.
The Onion, is stinky and while 'good' is only as 'good' as the Hellbringer (which is ten tons lighter). It's not even in the same league as the TBR.
#72
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:54 AM
Lugh, on 14 March 2016 - 09:48 AM, said:
The Highlander IIC is not better than ANY of the other Clan assaults. It might be as good as Mr Gargs. But even that's a stretch.
Hunchback IIC is ~ = the stormcrow, for it's variability in build options, but the SCR is better overall with little thought needing to be put in to it.
The Onion, is stinky and while 'good' is only as 'good' as the Hellbringer (which is ten tons lighter). It's not even in the same league as the TBR.
Arctic Cheetah is Overall better, however, the Jenner IIC does have two advantages, and only two IMO.
1. It can equip a XL 315, which tops it off at 156 KPH, a 10KPH+ more than the cheetah.
2. As you've said, Derp power being only 1 variant, the Jenner IIC (O) (I use O to clarify the 1st variant.)
I can agree on the Highlander IIC, but I don't even think it's on the level of Senor Gargoyle.
Hunchback IIC, yep ~ to a crow just about.
and the Onion, well, he's a pretty above average heavy, not as good as a Timberwolf but able to carry a heavier pay load to match the Timber's agility.
#73
Posted 14 March 2016 - 09:59 AM
Scout Derek, on 14 March 2016 - 09:54 AM, said:
1. It can equip a XL 315, which tops it off at 156 KPH, a 10KPH+ more than the cheetah.
2. As you've said, Derp power being only 1 variant, the Jenner IIC (O) (I use O to clarify the 1st variant.)
I can agree on the Highlander IIC, but I don't even think it's on the level of Senor Gargoyle.
Hunchback IIC, yep ~ to a crow just about.
and the Onion, well, he's a pretty above average heavy, not as good as a Timberwolf but able to carry a heavier pay load to match the Timber's agility.
But sadly that heavier payload is often across three weapons systems which isn't as Derp friendly as 2 weapon systems.
Or even just one weapons system. It always amazes me the trouble people have with judging different systems mixed.
#74
Posted 14 March 2016 - 10:02 AM
Lugh, on 14 March 2016 - 09:59 AM, said:
Or even just one weapons system. It always amazes me the trouble people have with judging different systems mixed.
I can say this is true very much, but to me, for some reason, I've always liked 3 mediums, 3 SRM6+A and a UAC/20 in my Orion IIC (O). I just like it because I can either Alpha with all my weapons, or fire the SRMs and UAC/20 while using the mediums as backup weapons as necessary.
And for the judging, it amazes me too at times.
20 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 20 guests, 0 anonymous users