#1
Posted 17 March 2016 - 02:49 PM
Now it seems to have been deleted off of the forum for reasons unbeknownst to me. Seems odd as about every other post in general has been about bashing the Archer.
That's all fine and dandy. That's not my dilemma. My issue is that I offered the OP a basic pack, as he had stated he did not have an archer (opinion piece, which is allowed) because I thought his thread was a novel approach instead of one that goes down the typical avenue we see when a mech comes out. I want to honor my offer, so if you read this and it's you post on here. Now can't remember his exact handle, but I will know it when I see it.
kk ciao
#2
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:08 PM
#3
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:16 PM
#4
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:17 PM
#5
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:25 PM
#6
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:29 PM
You seem like a nice person and it's unfortunate that your good intentions are aimed at someone who was laughing at you and simply trying to cause forum arguments.
#7
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:32 PM
#8
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:33 PM
Coupled with its lame LRM quirks for a weapon system people say is bad, which are worse quirks than the Stalker, minus the misery and the one they gave large laser quirks to, plus PGI saying wrong quirks were used, and will be fixed, doing nothing about them and saying they will be reviewed only.
That is why people are being very negative about the Archer.
#9
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:40 PM
Cathy, on 17 March 2016 - 03:33 PM, said:
Coupled with its lame LRM quirks for a weapon system people say is bad, which are worse quirks than the Stalker, minus the misery and the one they gave large laser quirks to, plus PGI saying wrong quirks were used, and will be fixed, doing nothing about them and saying they will be reviewed only.
That is why people are being very negative about the Archer.
well, the fact it's not even "very good" at SRM based because it's hitboxes are terribad and it has no structure buff, like say..the Warhammer or Marauder to help.
270 meter range, moderately slow mech, fragile hitboxes you can hit from any angle.... sure a couple of them can bring some heat, but they don't last very long.
#10
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:42 PM
#11
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:51 PM
Cathy, on 17 March 2016 - 03:33 PM, said:
That is why people are being very negative about the Archer.
I wonder how many packs PGI saved by stating that the quirks were released early and they would be revised... only to have nothing change as people unpacked their bundles on Tuesday? That's some dirty pool, right there.
#12
Posted 17 March 2016 - 03:59 PM
#13
Posted 17 March 2016 - 04:59 PM
...someone's gonna be disappointed in a hurry. Rightfully.
Silly me to think an Archer would be better with missiles than a Warhammer. I mean, no common sense amiright?
#14
Posted 17 March 2016 - 05:11 PM
Mark my words.
Oh almost forgot.....
#15
Posted 17 March 2016 - 05:13 PM
The first sentence of it established the OP as a non archer owner that proceeded to explain why the mech he/she has never piloted is good...
Was not well received
#16
Posted 17 March 2016 - 07:56 PM
JackalBeast, on 17 March 2016 - 03:32 PM, said:
In that case, gift me the Archer pack. After all, I said this.
El Bandito, on 16 March 2016 - 12:47 PM, said:
As long as the mech has 4-5 missile hardpoints, with enough tonnage, I can make magic with LRMs.
#18
Posted 17 March 2016 - 08:44 PM
#20
Posted 17 March 2016 - 08:52 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users