16 replies to this topic

[Canuck307]

Just curious what everyone is getting for average FPS in game.

I did 3 separate runs. All in testing grounds on Forest Colony.

I performed each run the same at 3 different resolutions.
-2 minute benchmark
-Firestarter Alpha used (8 small pulse)
-Ran straight to the Atlas in F7
-Looked around wildly along the way
-Circled the atlas while taking each arm
-Finally taking out right rear torso while circling (which resulted in ammo explosion all 3 times)

Just in case anyone wants to perform the exact same benchmark...

Settings as follows:
Motion Blur: Off
VSync: Off
Damage Glow: Off
Effects: Very High
Object Detail: Very High
Particles: Medium
Post Processing: Very High
Shading: Very High
Shadows: Very High
Texturing: Very High
Environment: Very High

Specs:
i7 5960X @ 4.5 GHz
3x Titan black (+180 GPU clock, +210 Mem Clock)
64GB Ripjaws RAM @ 2133MHz
4x intel 730 series SSD (Raid 0)
Windows 10
Custom duel water loops

Results (I took a picture of my aida 64 monitor at the end of every run as well)

Plus a few questions.
-If MWO is so CPU intensive, why does it not peg a single core to near 100%?
-Why is it utilizing my second and third GPU? Pegging them higher than my main card, yet getting no improvement.
-With so many resources left over on my computer, why cant I get a higher FPS in all resolutions?

1920x1080:
Frames: 14815
Time: 120000 (ms)
Min FPS: 93
Max FPS: 160
Avg FPS: 123.458



2560x1440:
Frames: 13074
Time: 120000 (ms)
Min FPS: 86
Max FPS: 121
Avg FPS: 108.95



3840x2160:
Frames: 7149
Time: 120000 (ms)
Min FPS: 49
Max FPS: 66
Avg FPS: 59.575

[Wintersdark]

MWO's SLI is terrible.


It's really bad.

You'll probably get better results with just one card. Seriously.

[BabyCakes666]

im doing good with sli 80fps-50fps 40fps when **** going down like huge brawl D:

but i tinkered with the nvidia profile with nvidia inspector so try that i turned on a bunch of optimizations and forced off the games AA and forced on FXAA

gtx 770 sli
FX6300 @ 5ghz
16g DDR3 @ 2200

[Chuck Jager]

I had such a bad experience with SLI and a one hit wonder board that I have never thought about it again.

I have given up on very high end tech on middle of the road companies. My new set up is Asus board w 4690k and a Nvidia gtx 960 plus an ssd and ram that asus has tested for that board. With particles set to low and most everything else mid-high I am getting 80-120 pretty much all the time.

If I was still actively working full time in Web Design I would go with an I7, but most games do not utilize the extra power that the chip provides. I am pretty sure that is changing, but I do not know when I7s will provide better performance than I5s across the majority of games. They do help if you have other stuff running at the same time. [note this is a brief thumbnail piece of advice for general purposes - do not want to start a fight over i7 vs i5]. This is also partly the same reason that many games do worse with AMD processors too.

Edited by Chuck Jager, 11 April 2016 - 01:24 PM.

[JediPanther]

My fps is at 30-40 which is quite sad since I can run skyrim at max every thing and my computer is about 4 years old now with amd 8150 single card and bare bones 8 gig ram on win 10. Batman Gotham city runs on a steady 55 fps using its own becnh mark. MWO is the only game I'm force to go uber low settings and turn off all the post processing and shadows etc.

[Goose]

U WOT

[Madcap72]

9-14

[Afuldan McKronik]

140 FPS dropship. 100-90 no particles on screen. 50-60 FPS with lots of particles. Those silly 6xLBX2 dires bring my fps down to about 25.

I7 6700k, 16 GB RAM @ 3200, Sapphire R9 390X, running on a SSD.

Edit; Very High every setting, second highest AA.

Edited by Afuldan McKronik, 11 April 2016 - 04:40 PM.

[Troutmonkey]

30-60 FPS in game with 5760*1080p with everything at Ultra. No AA
Specs in sig.

[Afuldan McKronik]

Ah yeah. Ultra. Thats the setting. God I kinda miss Low/Medium/High and AA On/Off. And my GT9800 slaying every game I could throw at it.

[Lyoto Machida]

20-30...even lower in CW.

[Wintersdark]

GTX 980, i5 4690k@4ghz.

I've got vsync on, with a 60hz display, so I'm at 60fps, dont know how high it could go. Never lower.

I also run ReShade adding Ambient Occlusion and some vibrancy and sharpness, all game settings maxed at 1920x1080.

Edited by Wintersdark, 11 April 2016 - 05:35 PM.

[Hit the Deck]

Around 20 fps on my potato machine

[Karl Marlow]

I'm not really big into Fps but I do enjoy some battlefield from time to time with friends.

[S 0 L E N Y A]

GTX 970 and Haswell, stock factory settings
1920x1080

On max settings:usually hovers over 100FPS.
Lowest I have ever seen is just bellow 60, and that is when there is a crazy brawl going with tons of LRMs in the air.

Edited by Boogie138, 11 April 2016 - 07:16 PM.

[Tarogato]

25-40.

Yes, I play on a laptop. At all lowest settings and resolution. Judge me.

[Karmen Baric]

40fps on medium