Jump to content

Patch Notes - 1.4.65 - 19-Apr-2016


386 replies to this topic

#21 Vas79

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 826 posts
  • LocationSt Ives, Capitol Apocalypse Lancer Compact

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:05 PM

My god, I actually want to play mech after looking at the CW changes. Here's hoping they don't disappoint.

#22 Life The Universe and Everything

    Rookie

  • Knight Errant
  • 1 posts

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:08 PM

so, you're saying we should actually play faction games now? that's pretty exciting. now to see if implementation brings more players into the fold

Quote

[color=#00FFFF]• Sulfurous Rift: C4 - Unfortunately, this also fixed an issue where shooting the ground would eject a hilarious fountain of snow. You will be missed, snow fountain.[/color]


good to know i'm not the only person who shoots it as i go by for good luck, WHERE WILL I GET MY LUCK NOW??

#23 Monkey Lover

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 7,918 posts
  • LocationWazan

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:09 PM

View PostCarl Vickers, on 18 April 2016 - 09:04 PM, said:


Might be a good idea to clear out the lists of inactives then to keep the costs down. I can see donations being needed when entering a bigger unit though.



Yep you're going to see a lot of this. Cost is just going to get passed onto the people joining.

#24 Tarogato

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Civil Servant
  • Civil Servant
  • 6,558 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:11 PM

Hmmm, can I please get a dev to confirm on this... I ran the numbers through a spreadsheet I have and I feel like that heat dissipation quirk is a significant nerf to the Locust. I haven't checked any other mechs with the new quirk yet, but this is what I've got on this variant:


LCT-1E
XL190, 6ML, 10DHS


Old quirks:

Energy Heat Gen -25%
Laser Duration -25%

- six medium lasers
- 7 TruDubs + 3 PoorDubs
- 18 heat per alpha
- 1.82 heat dissipated per second
- 10.902 heat per weapon recycle



New quirks:

Energy Heat Gen -5%
Laser Duration -25%
Heat dissipation rate +18%

- six medium lasers
- 7 TruDubs + 3 PoorDubs
- 22.8 heat per alpha
- 2.15 heat dissipated per second
- 14.424 heat per weapon recycle = much HOTTER!!





Hypothetical quirks:

Energy Heat Gen -5%
Laser Duration -25%
Heat dissipation rate +67.62% (wow that's a big number... )

- six medium lasers
- 7 TruDubs + 3 PoorDubs
- 22.8 heat per alpha
- 3.05 heat dissipated per second
- 10.902 heat per weapon recycle (same as earlier)

#25 TercieI

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 8,161 posts
  • LocationThe Far Country

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:11 PM

That's a lot of patch notes. And finally CW that looks interesting.

#26 Slimspadey101

    Member

  • PipPip
  • 26 posts
  • LocationSt. Louis

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:12 PM

I'll be back

#27 The14th

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 93 posts

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:16 PM

I feel beyond ready for this

#28 Arkhangel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 2
  • Mercenary Rank 2
  • 1,202 posts
  • LocationBritish Columbia

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:17 PM

Can't wait to hear the whining of a Clanner unit when a Long Tom flushes out their carefully set up poking firing line. no more hiding!

#29 -Skyrider-

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Undertaker
  • The Undertaker
  • 157 posts
  • Locationall about that Seattle life

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:20 PM

This looks like fun

#30 White Bear 84

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,857 posts

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:21 PM

View PostDirk Le Daring, on 18 April 2016 - 08:39 PM, said:

Wow huge..... Now to read through it. Oh, and cheers for the effort Mr G. <S>


Unit size control 101?

Could see more sub units - those that are interested in CW and those that are not, you are not going to want inactive CW players penalising the unit re: costs...

#31 Arkhangel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 2
  • Mercenary Rank 2
  • 1,202 posts
  • LocationBritish Columbia

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:23 PM

View PostWhite Bear 84, on 18 April 2016 - 09:21 PM, said:


Unit size control 101?

Could see more sub units - those that are interested in CW and those that are not, you are not going to want inactive CW players penalising the unit re: costs...

it's mainly mostly to cut down those giant units that currently basically control the map, like MercStar Alliance, which is actually four full merc units under the same banner. they can still be allies, just won't be able to really control the map anymore.

#32 Kael Posavatz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • 971 posts
  • LocationOn a quest to find the Star League

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:25 PM

Well, it looks good. And it certainly sounds nice.


There are a couple of points that have me going "wait, what?" but that may be because I stayed up past that point that all good little MechWarriors should be in bed dreaming dreams of glorious battles to be fought and...stuff.


I suppose what it'll really come down to is how well it actually works.

Oh, and did Mercs just get entirely new rewards to earn and loyalists get shafted?

#33 Arkhangel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 2
  • Mercenary Rank 2
  • 1,202 posts
  • LocationBritish Columbia

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:27 PM

not entirely Kael, it's mainly they always get a decent paycheck, whereas it's hit and miss with being a Merc dependant on the population of said faction.

#34 IQcreditscore

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 52 posts

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:27 PM

Looks very nice. Intricate enough for the people who really get into the lore while making clanwars worth something also. I do regret starting playing a week ago instead of a few months ago since now I may have to spend some cash irl for more mech bays. lol np. Looks like it will be well worth the work to see about playing srzbzns in this game now.

Although in my limited playing experience I find the ppc and erppc would be far more benefited by a longer range before it drops off in damage. Something to make it worth the heat compared with lazors pew pew.

Edited by FLINTCOIN, 18 April 2016 - 09:34 PM.


#35 Scanz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 786 posts

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:28 PM

Can't find TKs fix :(((

#36 MechWarrior319348

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 997 posts
  • LocationInside a straightjacket

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:30 PM

pirate faction

PLEASE!!!!!!

Edited by Gigliowanananacom, 18 April 2016 - 09:30 PM.


#37 Johnny Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 9,942 posts
  • LocationDueling on Solaris

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:38 PM

Best update ever.

#38 Scanz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 786 posts

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:39 PM

View PostTarogato, on 18 April 2016 - 09:11 PM, said:

Hmmm, can I please get a dev to confirm on this... I ran the numbers through a spreadsheet I have and I feel like that heat dissipation quirk is a significant nerf to the Locust. I haven't checked any other mechs with the new quirk yet, but this is what I've got on this variant:


LCT-1E
XL190, 6ML, 10DHS


Old quirks:




thats idia - 1e was too op

#39 stevemac

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 415 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationWazan Meat Grinder

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:41 PM

Over all great update cant wait to play... only thing I dont like is they should of made it so unit leaders decide what to do not make sure everyone of there pilots log in and vote.

#40 White Bear 84

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,857 posts

Posted 18 April 2016 - 09:43 PM

Camping mech's be all like.. Awwwwwrrr hell no!

Posted Image





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users