

Cataphract Weapon Geometry Update Incoming?
#21
Posted 12 August 2016 - 11:42 PM
Better weapon 'placement' would be phenomenal, it's already bulky and Fugly, lower weapons don't help
I didn't own JM6s until last year but there is a HUGE difference, its really outrageous, 5 less tons but so much of a difference
#22
Posted 13 August 2016 - 12:04 AM
Xetelian, on 12 August 2016 - 11:42 PM, said:
Better weapon 'placement' would be phenomenal, it's already bulky and Fugly, lower weapons don't help
I didn't own JM6s until last year but there is a HUGE difference, its really outrageous, 5 less tons but so much of a difference
Sadly, there won't be such a thing, because, as I said, the Cataphract is the Frankenstein's monster of Battletech, a mech who's very creation was borne out of desperation and was constructed out of the scraps of other mechs.
#23
Posted 13 August 2016 - 12:06 AM

NEW PICTURE, oh **** oh **** oh ****.
It's a bit blurry, but if you look at the in-game pics on either side, you can see that the colored PPC barrel matches (and the LA single laser instead of the double box we currently have). If you look MORE closely, you can also see that it doesn't have the ugly square pegs for lasers.
Oh ****, i might be right on this one! It might actually be a thing!
Oh, i'm getting actually excited
Edited by Juodas Varnas, 13 August 2016 - 12:11 AM.
#24
Posted 13 August 2016 - 12:11 AM
Juodas Varnas, on 13 August 2016 - 12:06 AM, said:

NEW PICTURE, oh **** oh **** oh ****.
It's a bit blurry, but if you look at the in-game pics on either side, you can see that the colored PPC barrel matches (and the LA single laser instead of the double box we currently have).
Oh ****, i might be right on this one! It might actually be a thing!
Oh, i'm getting actually excited
If you have a mech erection longer than 4 hours...
I think you're seeing things that you want to see...
#26
Posted 13 August 2016 - 12:17 AM
Juodas Varnas, on 13 August 2016 - 12:15 AM, said:
I think you need to be committed (to an asylum, filled with all the quadrupeds that you'll never get to see in MWO).
Edited by Deathlike, 13 August 2016 - 12:17 AM.
#28
Posted 13 August 2016 - 06:36 AM
Deathlike, on 12 August 2016 - 08:19 AM, said:
The Loyalty Cataphract (3L) is mostly a clone of the 1X.
I'm sure you need to
#returnCN9missilebaydoor
The problem stems from trying to have a 2x20+15 tube configuration.
Then again, the Vindis would love an additional missile hardpoint...
Vindi would appreciate their missile bay door too...instead of the god awful missile torso eyesore.

#29
Posted 13 August 2016 - 06:40 AM
MauttyKoray, on 13 August 2016 - 06:36 AM, said:
They could also use their LA fore-arm shortened a bit. Looks like it has the arm of a monkey.
Edited by Juodas Varnas, 13 August 2016 - 06:40 AM.
#30
Posted 13 August 2016 - 08:59 AM
#31
Posted 13 August 2016 - 12:48 PM
Ghostrider0067, on 13 August 2016 - 08:59 AM, said:
Well, i really hope it's legit and not a rendering, hahaha!
We really need more people to pester russ about it.
I mean it's easy to ignore me, when it's JUST me.
#32
Posted 13 August 2016 - 12:52 PM
#33
Posted 13 August 2016 - 01:09 PM
if nothing else the right arm could use a little toning down ( that thing is gigantic )
Edited by ChapeL, 13 August 2016 - 01:10 PM.
#34
Posted 13 August 2016 - 05:56 PM
#35
Posted 13 August 2016 - 08:26 PM
ShadowFire, on 13 August 2016 - 05:56 PM, said:
In my opinion, we should be able to choose which location to use for which weapon. We should not be required to use machine guns and small lasers to push up weapons to locations we want them to be.
#36
Posted 14 August 2016 - 05:16 AM
Juodas Varnas, on 13 August 2016 - 08:26 PM, said:
Lostech.
Russ is kinda aware of it (if he even understands the problem), but it's not a priority obviously.
#38
Posted 14 August 2016 - 10:55 AM
Juodas Varnas, on 14 August 2016 - 10:53 AM, said:
But knowing that they're at least AWARE of it is something...
Only to forget about them.
Remember, the Suckoner was once a mech that was "Russ's favorite" and he felt didn't need improvements whenever asked for buffs.
Apparently the only improvements was in the form of you getting more mechpacks to acquire the necessary omnipods.
#39
Posted 14 August 2016 - 11:01 AM
Deathlike, on 14 August 2016 - 10:55 AM, said:
Only to forget about them.
Remember, the Suckoner was once a mech that was "Russ's favorite" and he felt didn't need improvements whenever asked for buffs.
Apparently the only improvements was in the form of you getting more mechpacks to acquire the necessary omnipods.
Hopefully, i won't take the whole bloody year for the non-(L) variants to come out.
But seeing how the 2015 ones haven't been released yet...
God, it's depressing
#40
Posted 14 August 2016 - 11:59 AM
Juodas Varnas, on 14 August 2016 - 11:01 AM, said:
But seeing how the 2015 ones haven't been released yet...
God, it's depressing
Have you even compared the releases of the previous years?
About this time a year later, you'll get access to those damn omnipods.
The wait is real.
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users