

Skill Tree Predictions
#21
Posted 24 September 2016 - 10:36 PM
#22
Posted 24 September 2016 - 10:52 PM
BLOOD WOLF, on 24 September 2016 - 08:02 PM, said:
As you said, this thread is about predictions.
Instead of being reactionary, how about you post your predictions?
#24
Posted 25 September 2016 - 12:14 AM
And yes, I expect them to have the same effect as our current one.
Appogee, on 24 September 2016 - 11:37 PM, said:
Clan ACs/LBX. Quickplay itself.
Edited by RestosIII, 25 September 2016 - 12:16 AM.
#25
Posted 25 September 2016 - 12:32 AM
Hunka Junk, on 24 September 2016 - 10:52 PM, said:
Instead of being reactionary, how about you post your predictions?
. So i just took the point of his post and flipped it. The Half-*** part was a nice touch.
have no clue what you mean by "reactionary". I guess the opposite of that is a sponge or something.
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 25 September 2016 - 12:35 AM.
#26
Posted 25 September 2016 - 12:54 AM
Appogee, on 24 September 2016 - 11:37 PM, said:
cacs, lfg, chat, voip, ghost heat, modules, the game engine, i could probibly come up with a mile long list if i really tried, but im trying to cut back on salt.
Edited by LordNothing, 25 September 2016 - 12:56 AM.
#27
Posted 25 September 2016 - 01:39 AM
Appogee, on 24 September 2016 - 11:37 PM, said:
CW?
At least one can hope ...
Apart from that ... LB-X autocannons (mostly the Clan ones), Information Warfare, the Command Console, the game lobby/chat system - and hopefully Paul.
#28
Posted 25 September 2016 - 05:36 AM
#30
Posted 25 September 2016 - 05:49 AM
Davegt27, on 25 September 2016 - 05:36 AM, said:
Because Russ has been talking about its replacement since at least August of last year.
As to his motivations, I'd like to think it is do to player demand for a skill tree that actually provides a bit of specialization with benefits and costs reflected by the decisions you make in climbing the "tree". Alas, what we will get will be something completely out of left field that few will like, and no one will understand from a game play, MW or BT perspective...at least the that is my prediction.
Edit: lord have mercy...it just hit me: the new skill tree will be based on ED.
Each skill will be based on an aspect of ED. I haven't thought though it yet, but the skills will be based on spending XP to get, say a max 5 point over the alpha limit with certain weapons (energy), or 5% better heat performance with specific weapons...something along those lines.
Skills tree will be ED with bonuses. That's my guess.
Edited by Bud Crue, 25 September 2016 - 05:57 AM.
#31
Posted 25 September 2016 - 10:45 AM
I don't remember anything on the town halls
maybe its a twitter thing or the same guy that said MWO needs to be on Steam
#32
Posted 25 September 2016 - 10:47 AM
#33
Posted 25 September 2016 - 10:50 AM
BLOOD WOLF, on 24 September 2016 - 08:02 PM, said:
Much like all your posts. I've come to expect half assed work from pgi the past few years while they hawk mech packs like a used car dealer. I bet you know all the details of the skill tree so tell us what exactly is "skill." Must be nice to be on the buddy system with the Nerfinator.
#35
Posted 25 September 2016 - 11:02 AM
Just sayin tho.
I recall a meeting about FP where peeps were told about taking out contracts on other players. I just noticed that that whole thing was s'posed to be based on contracts between players.
I think it's not terribly far out if any meaningful development at this point could be cannibalized from previous ventures or some kind of guinea pig for future endeavors. And that's why so much time is being put into Mr Tree..
#36
Posted 25 September 2016 - 01:12 PM
Scout Derek, on 25 September 2016 - 01:09 PM, said:
you do not deal in reality, but I do. So let me help you see the world
Mind as well change this to
you do not deal in Trolling, but I do. So let me help you see my world.
If you're just going to troll people like that.
If you look at my post and the one to the other guy. I just take what they say and change it a bit to turn it back. Probably didn't catch that.
of course you only address me, I understand. The Bias is real. I just took their post and added some flavor. I qouted panthers post and added half-assed, instead of half-planned.
Not my fault I hurt his feelings.
Edited by BLOOD WOLF, 25 September 2016 - 01:19 PM.
#37
Posted 25 September 2016 - 01:19 PM
BLOOD WOLF, on 25 September 2016 - 01:12 PM, said:
of course you only address me, I understand. The Bias is real. I just took their post and added some flavor.
I did.
But you insist on replying to that garbage post of his. Just leave him be. If he wants to spew garbage, let him. Not like you can change his mind anyways.
#38
Posted 25 September 2016 - 01:40 PM
Scout Derek, on 25 September 2016 - 01:19 PM, said:
I did.
But you insist on replying to that garbage post of his. Just leave him be. If he wants to spew garbage, let him. Not like you can change his mind anyways.
I was trying to illustrate a point. Not for him, but for the other guy who might be reading. After all this isn't the forum where things go unchallenged. I simply saw something that was a silly statement. I decided that I was going to take that statement and reverse it. Maybe *** was a stronger word but the point stood
#39
Posted 25 September 2016 - 02:41 PM
#40
Posted 25 September 2016 - 02:48 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users